User talk:Hipocrite/03/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Hipocrite. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notice of amended RfC
There is an RfC related to paid editing on which you commented or !voted, which was just amended. See Wikipedia_talk:Harassment#RfC:_Links_related_to_paid_editing Jytdog (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Just wondering why I got this. I had nothing to do with Gamergate, nor was I ever mentioned as far as I can tell. Just curious. Thanks. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Lena Dunham is covered by the sanctions in question. Hipocrite (talk) 18:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- While technically accurate, the spirit of the scoping on the sanction is to prevent exporting drama from Gamergate to Dunham. Alerting editors who have not made Gamergate edits is doing exactly that. Rhoark (talk) 01:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Best of luck
I noticed you trying to find a measure of resolution at Burzynski Clinic - I do wish you the best of luck. Just a note: IHTS has posted that he won't edit on Monday, so if you feel you're not being responded to - I wouldn't take it as anything personal. — Ched : ? 17:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration request concerning you
Please see WP:A/R/C. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration case request declined
Hi Hipocrite, the Arbitration Committee has declined the Infoboxes II arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 06:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)