User talk:HighKing/Archives/2016/November

Renua

Could you have a look at Renua Ireland again when you get a chance? The SPA has been temporarily blocked. It's frustrating to be accused of saying the exact opposite of what I've actually said on that talk page... Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 00:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Codeproof article

@user:HighKing: I am working on a revised Codeproof article on my sandbox here. It contains genuine sources. Please take a look at it. Shilpacs (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

@Shilpacs:, I've looked at the sources you've provided. A sensible question to ask is "What is Codeproof *notable* for?". Bear in mind that in order to establish notability, WP:CORPDEPTH states that it is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Please read WP:RS as it contains a lot of useful information. In my opinion having looked at the sources:

• Redmond Reporter, CEOCFOInterviews fails WP:RS, SmallBusinessComputing.com, Geekwire, MSPMentor are essentially WP:PRIMARY sources as they are "quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources".
• CRN, CIO magazine, SmallBusinessComputing list, WirelessandMobileNews, Samsung Partner listing, LG Partner listing, lists Codeproof in lists such as one of the 10 Coolest Mobile Device Management vendors or an entrant in a list of startup pitches or listed as a partner on another companies website. WP:CORPDEPTH excludes inclusion in lists of similar organizations for establishing notability.
• smallbiztrends.com is not a good reference as it simply repeats company marketing material.
• SCMagazine, ComputerWeekly mentions Codeproof but fails WP:CORPDEPTH as it is "passing mention".
• A Patent does not establish notability.
• ZDNet "Small Business Metters" is a blog by the contributor (as disclosed on her bio) and as per WP:RS, blogs are not considered reliable sources. This one might be arguable though...
• HelpNetSecurity product review appears independent and the publication appears reliable and independent. I would regard this as a good reference.

In my opinion, it is WP:TOOSOON for CodeProtect as there is not enough significant coverage in secondary sources. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@ HighKing : Thanks for the feedback. Really appreciate it. Is there any chance of having this page? Shilpacs (talk) 04:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@Shilpacs:: In my opinion the company is way too early for a page. There are not enough sources to establish notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HighKing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Steven McGonigal

Dear High King,

I would like you to answer why you constantly remove steven mcgonigal from wikipedia as an author? He has and continues to publish work on country sports and is from derry so what reason have you to remove him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherryamo (talk • contribs) 00:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

Dear HighKing,

I have filed for a dispute resolution with wikipedia to request that you refrain from removing Steven McGonogal from wikipedia as an author from Derry.

I would request that you consider this request and understand that regardless of your opinion, facts are facts and Mr McGonigal is an author, is from derry and should be included on the page.

I also would request that if you feel so strongly about the matter that you give your reasons for removing Mr McGonigal from the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherryamo (talk • contribs) 00:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)