User talk:Hcrater

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Body Dirac Equations.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 05:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two Body Dirac Equations

Hi - thanks for creating this article! Could you please define the variables properly? I encountered it today and cleaned up much of the formatting, added links, and had to guess from the painfully vague statement:

"As seen below, for two particles interacting by way of both world scalar ${\tilde {S}}_{i}\,\!$ and four-vector ${\tilde {A}}_{i}^{\mu }\,\!$ interactions, each equation has the same structure as the ordinary one-body Dirac equation in the presence of external scalar and vector potentials."

that "4-vector interaction" really meant "the electromagnetic interaction, described by the 4-potential, given that there is a γ_μ(p^μ − A^μ) term, suggestivley the subtraction of the potential momentum from total momentum to yeild the kinetic momentum, and the mention of "scalar and vector potentials" which in physical context almost always refers to electromagnetic potentials. "4-vector interaction" is really meaningless - there are many 4-vectors and they are mathematical, a physical interaction arises from the fundamental forces. Also - what is a/the "world scalar ${\tilde {S}}_{i}\,\!$ " ? If you mean the scalar electric potential then its redundant - already included in the 4-potential. I tagged it with a "clarification needed" template for now.

Anyway, thanks in advance for your reply! Looking forwards to clarification. =)

F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 13:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also...

Thanks for the feedback. In the last week I have added more material and more references to works that preceded and are included in the ones presented in the present (6/17/12) form of the paper. I hope the additions clarify. Would welcome any further feedback. Greatly appreciate the box of field theory links

Horace Crater

Hcrater (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hcrater, I have taken the liberty of moving your reply. Normally that would be inappropriate on Wikipedia, but it is intended as help. You should always reply to a message below that message, or people will get confused. Also, indentations (using colons as formatting) help to distinguish each message from its reply. See talk page layout for more information. RockMagnetist (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hcrater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Suprised you were not given a proper welcome, so here it is! F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 13:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original research..

I forgot to add - please do not write content which is your own work. Please see WP:OR, your page may be deleted if you do not provide secondary sources, that was most likey the main reason the page was refused at your request. I have removed your own references. Thank you. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 13:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add the refs back. Many apologies for any insult, similar cases to this occur time to time which is why I became too "precautious" - thanks again for the article. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 16:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

Hcrater, I have tagged your article, Two-body Dirac equations, as being unbalanced in that you cite almost exclusively your own work. This is also a sign of a conflict of interest (see the Wikipedia guidelines on conflict of interest). I think it would really help if you provided the missing context, particularly the relationship of this theory to previous theories like that of Breit; and also cite more of the work by other people. RockMagnetist (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hcrater. You have new messages at RockMagnetist's talk page.
Message added 22:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RockMagnetist (talk) 22:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About interactions....

According to your post on Rockmagnetist's talk page, it seems there was much more to the interactions described by A and S so I'm sorry to bias the equations to QED and not include QCD... =(

If you would like to get used to how wikipedia works first - its better that you keep the article in your sandbox, make continuous refinements, then when its perfected launch it into the mainspace, not while it may still be in development.

Please rewrite my misleading statements on the A and S variables and how they relate to the EM and strong forces (or other quark interactions you meant to say). Thanks and apologies once more, I'll stop interfering and/or irritating also... F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 23:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bargmann-Wigner equations?

Hello, and thanks for your contributions, especially two-body Dirac equations.

There is no article on the Bargmann-Wigner equations for particles of any spin. I asked the wikiproject physics group some time ago about this but there was no response (admittedly my post was fairly hyperactive and rude, but I'm different now).

I plan to cobble together in User:Maschen/Bargmann-Wigner equations a few papers and at least generate some start to the article: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], however I don't know eneogh QFT, nor have/can find any sources of my own which cite these equations (most books I source on WP are from the uni library).

Your expertise in QFT would be really valuable here. Thanks in advance for any/all help! I'd really appreciate it. Maschen (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relativistic Center of Mass

Nice article, looks very interesting.

If there are articles with similar/overlapping subject matter, don't worry - other articles can be linked to and from your article, possibly content could be transferred between articles as well. "Overlap" is not usually the reason for not having separate articles.

I took the liberty of tidying up a few things, and still in the process. There doesn't appear to be much feedback at the moment, but I think your article could be moved to mainspace.

Thanks, M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 09:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you don't mind me saying, some of your LaTeX markup is superfluous, using too many curly brackets like this

{\frac{-\vec{S}\times \vec{h}}{Mc(1+\sqrt{1+{\vec{h}}^2})}}

makes the formula hard to read in code.

Also, if desired, you may consider using one/more of {{cite book}}, {{cite article}}, {{cite journal}}, {{cite website}}, which provide a uniform formatting of references throughout an article (the authors, article title, publisher name, journal name, volume number, DOI, issue numbers, ISBN, etc. etc. all appear in the name place). You have already does this by hand, which is fine. Although, I removed the extra curly brackets around the titles, why are they needed? Are they from BibTeX or similar?

Regards, M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 09:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Submission on relativistic center of mass have recognized your work, and agree it is neutral, well-written, and well-referenced enough to be moved into mainspace. You may want to comment at the link on the article title though, as there are alternative title suggestions. Best, M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 19:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Center of mass (relativistic) was accepted

Center of mass (relativistic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Delirium (talk) 12:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hcrater, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

You've got mail

Let me know if you don't see the email in your inbox within a few minutes. Protonk (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://spsr.utsi.edu/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From Horace Crater to "Ukexpat". Please let me know if the material I provide below is sufficient for me to use the first few paragraphs from my website http://spsr.utsi.edu in the formation of my proposed Wikepedia articles. Let me know if there is any thing else I can provide to you.

Thanks

The following sentences were formed based on your website https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONSENT..

I hereby affirm that I, (Horace Crater), am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the web site http://spsr.utsi.edu I agree to publish a portion of that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

My name is Horace Crater. The web site is a faculty web site at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. I am the owner of the content of that web site. I wish to use only a portion of that web site (in particular the introductory descriptive paragraphs of the website http://spsr.utsi.edu ) as an introduction to a proposed Wikipedia article. I am a professor at my institute and my email address is hcrater@utsi.edu. The web master here can verify the information I am sending to you. His name and email address is Richard Gulley, rgulley@utsi.edu.

Talkback

Hello, Hcrater. You have new messages at Ukexpat's talk page.
Message added 19:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ukexpat (talk) 19:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~KvnG 16:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Planetary SETI Research (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 16:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research

Hello, Hcrater. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Society for Planetary SETI Research".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Society for Planetary SETI Research}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://archive.org/stream/arxiv-0912.2935/0912.2935_djvu.txt. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Several paragraphs in the earlier submission have been rewritten. This should take care of the verbatim overlap with portions of arxiv-0912.2935/0912.2935. The new draft will be submitted shortly Hcrater (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On June 17 I did a considerable rewrite of a section that was previously copied from the paper mentioned. I thought that took care of the issues raised in the decline of my article on June 5. However it appears there may be other sections that I have overlooked which overlap still with the paper mentioned since it was declined again on July 7.. Is there a way that you can show me what parts overlap substantially with the paper mentioned?. Hcrater (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://archive.org/stream/arxiv-0912.2935/0912.2935_djvu.txt. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Non-Inertial Reference Frames in Relativity (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Non-Inertial Reference Frames in Relativity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Center of mass (relativistic)

The article Center of mass (relativistic) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a misunderstood and misstated problem in special relativity that has been resurrected more recently by Alba, Crater and Lusanna, whose citations are largely mutual. (Note: From the user name, Crater appears to have created the article). There is little to be surprised about in a result that a Newtonian 3-vector formalism does not yield useful results in the context of special relativity. We don't publish non-notable misdirections in Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Quondum 02:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Instantaneous 3-spaces in Non-Inertial Reference Frames, from its old location at User:Hcrater. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Instantaneous 3-spaces in Non-Inertial Reference Frames

Hello, Hcrater. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Instantaneous 3-spaces in Non-Inertial Reference Frames, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Instantaneous 3-spaces in Non-Inertial Reference Frames

Hello, Hcrater. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Instantaneous 3-spaces in Non-Inertial Reference Frames".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]