User talk:Hayashihouyi

Hayashihouyi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hayashihouyi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese Communist Party, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 21:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amigao, can you stop your disruptive revert spam? Hayashihouyi (talk) 21:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lạc Việt. ... discospinster _talk 01:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should stop adding this unrelated infobox. Hayashihouyi (talk) 01:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is a template about the history of Vietnam unrelated to an article about ancient Vietnam? ... discospinster _talk 01:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about. How are ancient people that resides in an area related to the dynasties of Vietnam? That’s like plastering a Chinese template on Japanese articles because early Japanese people migrated from China. Are you deluded? Hayashihouyi (talk) 01:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Considering one of the categories of the article is Category:Ancient Vietnam no I don't think I'm deluded. ... discospinster _talk 02:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Maneki-neko, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 03:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you did make a mistake. Maybe read up the references or sources that are already on the article, instead of just downright removing things for no reason. You can have common sense. Hayashihouyi (talk) 03:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, other editors should go through every source on the page when you could have used WP:NAMEDREFS and/or left an wp:edit summary stating which reference applied?

Nice message you left on my talk page. Suggest you read wp:vandalism as to what is and what is not vandalism. Suggest you also read WP:PROVEIT. Adakiko (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taiwan. You deleted a comment which explicitly warns not to change instances of "country" to refer to Taiwan per consensus, and then proceeded removed such references. This can only be deliberate. DrIdiot (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: [1] DrIdiot (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 19:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What’s your argument, so called “moderator”. Because general people on Wikipedia say one thing that means it’s fact? What about neutrality, what happened with that? Taiwan is not a country, period. Keep coping. The whole world does not recognise Taiwan. Hayashihouyi (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dancheong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wuxing. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East Asian religions. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you okay? What was disruptive about the edit? The fact that I removed “from India” which isn’t necessary in the first place since 1. Everyone knows Buddhism is originally Indian, 2. If you click on Buddhism link it’ll already tell you more about it, 3. Technically ancient India , not India.

So? Must i bloat it with more text stating that it’s from ancient India instead of India? Hayashihouyi (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mahayana. Consistent history POV pushing, removal of sourced material. Feels strongly like WP:NOTHERE. DrIdiot (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read on what a Help:Minor_edit is. Changing wording is not a minor edit: [2] DrIdiot (talk) 15:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. User:SirachaEditor (talk) 12:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked? The edits I made seem perfectly reasonable and completely up to debate. Is this not practiced as it states in the Wikipedia edit rules? Hayashihouyi (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the reasoning behind your block, see the comments made by Bbb23 when closing the edit warring complaint about you. ...Hayashihouyi has been blocked before for disruptive editing, and since that time the pattern of disruption, failure to collaborate (including uncivil comments) with other editors, and certain nationalistic agendas persist, so I have indefinitely blocked them. See also the above warnings to you (from November) on your own talk page, and your prior block. EdJohnston (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Which “uncivil comments” and “nationalistic agendas”? Hayashihouyi (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I totally understand that clowns by society are perceived as non-human, failures and that people can bully them… even though this is wrong. I guess calling someone a clown is “very rude”, even though clowns are human. I will refrain from using this in the future! But then again, people also at times conceive being seen as human derogatory. They would rather be called a helicopter. I understand. Can I be unbanned now? Hayashihouyi (talk) 18:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hayashihouyi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel like being banned for using “clown” isn’t very rightful, in any regards. I understand and will refrain from using “clown” in the future. Hayashihouyi (talk) 22:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your page is absolutely littered with warnings for your inappropriate actions over the past month. This isn't a one-time thing. You were even blocked back in November. In order to be unblocked, you'll need to convince an admin that you understand what you've been doing wrong for more than a month and how we can be sure none of that will recur. Yamla (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.