User talk:Handrem

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like...

You have contributed to many articles pertaining to the seduction community. Please help improve the articles for Jordan Harbinger, Joshua Pellicer, and/or Johnny Dzubak. Thanks! EdrevEpac (talk) 16:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I've replied to you on my talk page. EdrevEpac (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of JDOG

An article that you have been involved in editing, JDOG, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JDOG (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Marc Kupper|talk 03:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer's Body and music in films

I reverted your edit here, because that is already in the article under the title Soundtrack. In addition, putting it in the Music section is out of place because the Music section is more about what went into creating the music for the film, not about the soundtrack (though the soundtrack may be a part of music played within films in some cases, and is a bit in this case). Names of songs like that should be in the Soundtrack section, where it is already at. Flyer22 (talk) 23:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I'll reply here. I am in the seduction community and Adam Lyons is the only dating coach I hear good things about. He has been in the media countless times and was rated number 1 in the community, so there is no conflict of interest, I just think if the seduction community is on Wiki then Adam Lyons definitely should.

You seem to edit a lot of articles on Lovesystems, I am concerned there is a conflict of interest there, could you please clarify? DRosin (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of the seduction community but you can check my edit history and most of it is about other subjects than the dating industry. So I'm not sure why you are accusing my involvement with a particular dating company when I'm clearly not and my edits show this. I'm here to improve Wikipedia and clean up articles that need little edits. Handrem (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am afraid the other edits you have made are very small and random suggesting that you are editing for the sake of it appearing that you edit other articles and adding minimal value to the articles. I can provide some examples if you like. The following articles are just some examples of you promoting Love Systems on Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mystery_Method&diff=prev&oldid=267490081

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dating_coach&diff=prev&oldid=273550208

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keys_to_the_VIP&diff=prev&oldid=273679896

Let me know if the links don't work. While Love Systems is a notable company within the seduction community, your behaviour suggests a COI as you repeatedly only edit seduction-related articles to promote Love Systems or to remove information from competitors of Love Systems. Also the information you have added about the court hearing with Mystery on the first link is an example of poor editing as you create a clear bias in the article as Mystery 'surreptitiously' transferred the domain registration, and is unusual in the detail of the description unless you were in involved. I think it is good to have a balance in the representation of the seduction community so I will not report you concerning this, but I will advise you to minimize your editing which detracts from Wikipedia. It would be interesting to hear your views if you disagree with any of this. DRosin (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - I am not sure why you are so offended and attacking me? I kindly asked your involvement with Adam Lyons and COI, but you seem to be affected by some mere question. I have over 150 edits and contribute to make Wikipedia better so accusing me of promoting one company based on a couple edits is very narrow-minded. In fact, I have contributed to the seduction community articles and I'm trying to keep it clean from fake information. I would suggest you do the same instead of promoting one individual whom you have a particular interest in like Adam Lyons, if you are not him. Handrem (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Handrem, I am afraid you are taking this the wrong way. I am not offended. I am concerned you have a COI with Love Systems. You are correct in that you have over 150 edits, but my concern is that the vast majority of them are just you adding one wikilink. Let us take your last three edits for example.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trent_Reznor&diff=prev&oldid=327582559 - added wikilink for I Will Never Be The Same http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trent_Reznor&diff=prev&oldid=327582437 - added wikilink for Midtown Recording http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christmas_(Baby_Please_Come_Home)&diff=prev&oldid=327581823 - added wikilink for Quiet Jungle

Your edits are best explained by someone randomly searching for articles, adding a single wikilink before moving on. You are adding minimal value to these articles, and the only value they add is to your userpage as it makes it appear like you edit things other than Love Systems' related stuff. Your only significant and real edits appear to be related to Love Systems. I do not edit articles solely related to Adam Lyons. I have edited articles about Johnny Soporno, Owen Cook, Stephane Hermon and Hoobie as I have stated before. I have edited other things unrelated to Adam Lyons and seduction as well. I think you should try and add some more value to the articles you write in future. I don't say this in any malicious way, but I think your behaviour is not beneficial to Wikipedia as you, in my opinion, have an obvious COI with Love Systems. DRosin (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. (blocked by MuZemike 08:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.