User talk:Hamza Alaoui

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Schuon's article

"Initiated by Sheikh Ahmad al-Alawī into the Sufi Shādhilī order, he founded the Tarīqa Maryamiyya. His writings strongly emphasize the universality of metaphysical doctrine, along with the necessity of practising a religion"... could you please elaborate a little on this for me? What does it really mean? I mean the hightlighted part? And how is this a consistent picture? Salaam. Mosesheron (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello Mosesheron. The sentence you quote synthesizes the two indispensable elements of any religious (exoteric) path and of any spiritual (esoteric) path: 1) doctrine and 2) method, or theory and practice. In the case of the Perennialists, the doctrine is pure or essential metaphysics, which, for them, is common to and at the heart of all divine revelations. One can also call this doctrine "absolute esoterism", in order to distinguish it from the esoterisms specific to each religion (Sufism in the case of Islam, e.g.). As you well know, for those who have felt the call of the Divine – or who want to realize spiritually what doctrine taught them –, theory alone is ineffective: the actual relationship with God is primordial and it is His revelations that inform us of the necessary means for opening one’s soul to His presence (prayer, virtues, etc.). That is why the sentence you quote says: "along with the necessity of practising a religion". For the non-Perennialists, the approach is identical, the only difference being that, as they don’t accept the “transcendent unity of religions”, the formulation of the esoteric dimension of their own religion remains within the boundaries of that revelation and uses its language. But neither perspective is better or more effective than the other in relation to what only matters for the spiritual searcher: the return to God. My words or turn of phrases are probably not always well chosen as English is not my mother-tongue. Any comments from you – or from anyone else – are of course welcome, because if the sentence you quoted is not clear, we will have to think about improving it. Thank you,--Hamza Alaoui (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

While I am not an expert on perennial philosophy, I do have some familiarity with its principles. My primary concern here is Schuon's status as a Sufi and founder of a tariqa. Sufis adhere to sharia and advise others to do the same. However, the sentence I quoted gives the impression that Schuon was not a Sufi at all. In my opinion, anyone who reads the sentence and fails to see that is ignorant about Sufism. How do you evaluate that? Mosesheron (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello Mosesheron. You quoted two sentences; I suppose you are referring to the second one when you say that it "gives the impression that Schuon was not a Sufi at all". This sentence starts with "His writings", thus his books, and his books were of course written for readers of all religions and not only for his disciples or for Muslims; it is therefore normal that he says that one must follow a religion and not that one must follow the Islamic religion. Does this answer your question or have I misunderstood you?--Hamza Alaoui (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

In fact, there have been varied interpretations of Schoun's teachings over time. Nasr, Schoun's primary student and successor, emphasizes the Islamic aspect of his teachings more strongly than others. I recently came across an article by Nasr titled "Frithjof-Schuon-and-the-Islamic-Tradition" that was written after Schoun's death. If my memory serves me well, I recall this approach is evident in Nasr’s previous writings as well. In my opinion, Nasr's depiction reconciles many of the differing viewpoints, and only within Nasr's framework Schoun can be considered a true Sufi master and an expositor of universal metaphysics. However, there are individuals such as Patrick Laude who disagree with Nasr on various aspects, including Schoun's Islamic orientation and teachings. It seems that Laude et al have gained more popularity in certain circles. Mosesheron (talk) 12:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Conversion"

Dear Hamza Alaoui, I opened the question in René Guénon TP. Best wishes, Numwide (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear Numwide, when I reverted your edit, I was actually thinking in terms of WP, but personally I don't care if RG's name is withdrawn from that category. So if you remove it again, I won't object. Greetings, --Hamza Alaoui (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)