User talk:GuerrillaClock

Thank you for experimenting with the page Resistance: Fall of Man on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 20:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to MotorStorm. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mysdaao 20:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Esanchez7587. Thank you. Mysdaao 20:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Mysdaao, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have just been reported. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 20:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove it. That's all I have to say to you. --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 20:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 20:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked

For abuse of editing, you have been reported to administrators. This means that you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 21:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Anthony.bradbury 21:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's very chilidish of you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GuerrillaClock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was adding constructive criticism. Clearly, you aren't grown up enough to take it. I was saying there's no need to be arrogant when deleting edits. So please grow up a little. Its no coincidence your talk page is full of compliments. Because you delete anything slightly against you. That's a bit pathetic, right? So take a little criticism once in a while, please.

Decline reason:

Blatant personal attacks. — Yamla 21:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My friend, I am 63 years old. If you wish your block to be changed, I suggest that you make a significant and meaningful requst, rather than a pointless personal attack. Unblock request declined--Anthony.bradbury 21:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ctrl+Alt+Del

Well there was no proof that the link was Tim Buckley's IP address. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how many people share an opinion, if there are no published or reliable sources stating the opinion, it cannot be added to Wikipedia. So regretfully, I cannot undo my edit until you find some reliable sources. Thank you, Artichoker^[talk] 15:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by "posted". If it were put up by Yahtzee himself, then I assume it would be acceptable. Artichoker[talk] 21:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well if it was posted by Yahtzee, the go ahead and add it to the article. Just remember to reference it. Artichoker[talk] 19:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]