User talk:Greenmind

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 05:19, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University coats of arms

Hi! I noticed you've uploaded a handful of university coats of arms recently. Are you emblazoning them yourself or finding them elsewhere? If you're doing them yourself, keep in mind that you don't have to use the {{coatofarms}} license template -- you can license them under whatever terms you want (preferably free ones!) because the rights to an emblazon go to the artist. — mendel ☎ 14:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not drawing these guys myself. In most of the scenarios, I'm just replacing the Coats of Arms with a higher quality image that what was previously in use. Or, on more than one occasion, I just took the image that was already in use and changed the format from say...a jpeg to a PNG (to make the background transparent.) On a related note, it seems that most Canadian universities, between around 2000 and 2003 decided that it was important to standardize their "visual identity" and so most of them have provided incredibly precise standards on what their crest should be. Most of them say they are free to use for non-commercial purposes. In the past, I've use the {{logo}} license template, it's just that this time around there was a coat of arms template that seemed more appropriate. --Greenmind 23:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just making sure. I'd noticed a couple of incidents of people emblazoning arms themselves but using {{coatofarms}} from habit, even though they could use their own free license, so I thought I'd check. — mendel ☎ 00:26, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University template

Hi I noticed you made the template for the Schools of Queen's University. Just wondering is there a general template to follow or did you make it yourself? Thanks YCCHAN 20:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Do you know where I can view the source of the template?~~ Nvm, I found out. YCCHAN 23:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:UBC-Crest.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UBC-Crest.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 03:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Five banks reordering

Good call on reordering the banks according to size. However, it is not obvious whether the size goes from smallest to largest or largest to smallest. I'm actually a little unsure myself (although I think you've ordered them largest to smallest) so could you please change the line from "in order of size" to either "from smallest to largest" or "largest to smallest"? Also, if you have a source for the ordering, that'd be cool too. Thanks a million! Mustard 20:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what "size" is the ordering based on. It appears to be number of employees?
If it's done using market cap, the order would be: RBC, Scotia, TD, BMO, CIBC
If it's done using assets, the order would be: RBC, TD, Scotia, BMO, CIBC
If it's done using employees, the order would be: RBC, TD, Scotia, CIBC, BMO (the ordering that appeared before my edit)
This according to the stats that appear on the page.

I re-ordered using market cap and re-ordered the boxes beneath by the same order. Feel free to comment on whether that's the best way to do it. Kelvinc 07:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:QueensBands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:QueensBands.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:QueensBandsPiper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:QueensBandsPiper.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Queensfall.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Queensfall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Jkelly 01:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:UTCrest.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 13:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Remo

Do you know anything helpful about the Remo company? I've started the article under the name Remo (Company) But it remains a stub. Please lend a stick and enlist the help of those who know.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CFRClogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CFRClogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:QueensGoldenGaels.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:QueensGoldenGaels.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 01:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RMCcrest.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RMCcrest.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 15:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mcgill-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Mcgill-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Queenscornellmba.png}

Thank you for uploading Image:Queenscornellmba.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Ivy League

Thank you for your thoughtful edits to the Canadian Ivy article... definitely an improvement! 6mat1 (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmallUsermadeQueen's.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:SmallUsermadeQueen's.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:UBC-Crest.png)

You've uploaded File:UBC-Crest.png, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Greenmind! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Suzanne Fortier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:QueensGoldenGaels.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:QueensGoldenGaels.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Davis + Henderson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Davis + Henderson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mephistophelian (talk) 03:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queen's School of Computing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen's School of Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen's School of Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Billleggett.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billleggett.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Billleggett.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D+H for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D+H is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D+H until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Melvin Goodes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Melvin Goodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr Xaero ^☎️ 23:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Greenmind. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Queen's School of Computing" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's School of Computing. Since you had some involvement with the Queen's School of Computing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 07:52, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]