Jump to content

User talk:Gram123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Moving pages

[edit]

When you move a page, use Move function. You can see it in the top of the page. You can read more about it in Moving a page guide. The Move function is the only way to move the article edit history along the page. You can't do it by simply cutting and pasting text into a new location. The edit history is left in the old article location, where it is hard to find. But we must know the edit history, because Wikipedia's GFDL licence requires attribution, which means acknowledging the authors of the articles. So a cut and a paste move is actually a copyright infringement.

Also, you should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Naming conventions. The title that you gave for the Stars On 33 (Aim) article is against the guidelines. I made the page a redirect to the correct title. I moved the disambiguation page to the correct album article title, and then reverted the album article. (The disambiguation page had the essential edit history because you left it there when you cut and pasted the text elsewhere.) I created a more illustrating disambiguation page, so I have solved this problem. The situation isn't always as fortunate, sometimes people have to ask an administrator to solve the problem.

If you can't move a page with Move function, ask an administrator to move it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. -Hapsiainen 23:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Late Night Tales

[edit]

Hi Gram123,

good work on the Late Night Tales albums. I'd always use categories for large series of such items, and when there are more DJ-Kicks articles they will get one too. A suggestion: Maybe you should add a {{album infobox}} to your album stubs? You don't have to fill out all the blanks in them, but in my opinion, an album article with a complete infobox is nearly past the stub stage already. I've added one to DJ-Kicks: Nightmares on Wax now, you can see how it's done there - more information is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Table. Anyway, good work - and keep it up! -- grm_wnr Esc 21:51, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aim albums is already done right (except that all categories should have supercategories, which I've already added). You just have to put "[[Category:Grand Central Records albums]]" into the article text, save, then click the red link in the categories bar and create the category page (with supercategories - the Grand Central one would get Category:Albums by record label). After that it should work. A tip: When linking to a category, use a colon before the Category name, like this: "[[:Category:Grand Central Records albums]]", which creates Category:Grand Central Records albums. Without the colon, you just put the page into the category, and the link isn't displayed. I hope that helps - I have to go to bed now and can't categorize the pages myself, but if there are still problems I can help you tomorrow. -- grm_wnr Esc 00:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of independent record labels

[edit]

Hi Gram123, I see you have been adding countries to some labels in the list of independent record labels. That's nice, but wouldn't it be better if all lists of record labels are done in the same way? Extra information in the list when the article is not created yet (eg website, country, ...) but once the article is started there is no need anymore for this in the list. Please check also List of record labels, List of independent UK record labels, List of electronic music record labels, List of jungle and drum n bass record labels who all use this method (most of the time). warpozio 19:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fabric Live 17

[edit]

yeah i just rotated the tracks and titles, it just makes more sence to me. i am slowly adding the other Fabric Mix Albums so was just keaping it consistent. Junior Aspirin 21:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Amady / Amdy

[edit]

Because I'm an arse and despite changing the link you (rightly) corrected to the version you corrected *from*, I forgot to change it back wnen I swapped the mis-spelt article over from it's redirection. And if that makes no sense, drop me message and I'll explain it better when I'm sober... IainP (talk) 00:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Cinema template

[edit]
You can find these templates by editing the page that hosts it and checking at the bottom of the page for the template. Here is the one for European cinema http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:EuropeanCinema --Jahsonic 22:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zero 7

[edit]

Hello. I have removed the copyvio text from your comment on Talk:Zero 7 and have responded to it. Please let me know if there are any problems (or simply post on that talk page!) Thanks. --Nick Catalano (Talk) 00:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't help but notice (Edit Wars, grrr...) that you resumed doing some revamp work on the Ran page. I'm getting another page ready for a Featured Article nomination (Battle of Badr) but afterwards I was going to turn my attention back to Ran, now that I have the Criterion Edition and Stephen Prince's "The Warrior's Camera". Let me know if you're interested in collaborating. (This probably wouldn't be for another week or so) Palm_Dogg 11:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • As you may guess from my User page, I tend to primarily edit entertainment articles that I'm interested in. Ran is in my watchlist, as I'd added the DVD cover pic back in August, not long after I'd bought and watched the film. However, I've only seen it once (too many DVDs to watch) and the recent revamping was done in repsonse to seeing the {{peerreview}} template, and the to assist with the systematic removal of unnecessary date links (try doing a whatlinkshere to a date article!). As such, I don't know how much help I'd be, but I'll certainly keep an eye on proceedings and provide some input if I can. Gram 11:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Black Star

[edit]

As long as they don't double-redirect, it's ussually not much of a problem. But if you want to bypass the redirects, that is of course a worthwhile task. --FuriousFreddy 22:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the old Black Star redirects for deletion: Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#February 8. Please comment there if you don't think the redirects should be deleted (after a small history merge from Black Star(Music)). Mike Dillon 01:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

East Asian Cinema

[edit]

I notaced that the old eastern cinema article has been narrowed down into East Asian cinema - but isnt this a kinda unfair exclusion? Most people would consider India to be part of the east asian cultural block, especially given the closeness of South East Asian culture and film to Indian. Indian film, especially non-Bollywood industries, which produce regional language and art cinema, clearly support this view. The west asian cinema and culture starts with Iran - India should be included, or else, where exactly would you classify Indian cinema when it quite obiously isnt western? I strongly reccomend either including India in the east asian cinema article, or changing the entire thing back to eastern cinema - because the move seems to be one purely directed at excluding India, rather than one aimed at raising awareness. I would be glad to write that section if you wish. Vastu 05:23, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was to write an article which drew together the film industries of China, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea, these being my area of interest, and the countries with the largest film industries in what I would know (possibly due to an Anglo-centric view) as "Eastern cinema" or "Far Eastern cinema" or "Oriental cinema". It was pointed out to me that Eastern cinema is a bit of a vague title, and to be geographically accurate, East Asia is a more appropriate term. I have since learned a little about the film industries of neighbouring countries (which would still fall geographically into East Asia), so I created the article and template to be inclusive of these areas.
I understand your gripe - what I meant by "Eastern cinema" is more correctly expressed and understood using the term "East Asian cinema". The move was not done to exclude anywhere, but to clarify my original intention.
I disagee that India should be included within this article, because I don't believe it is geographically accurate to do so. I would suggest that it is absolutely appropriate to have an "Indian cinema" article (actually Cinema of India already exists) and if you so wish, a relevant regional cinema article. Looking at the articles for East Asia and South Asia, it is clear that India falls into the latter, not the former, so your regional article would be South Asian cinema and should therefore contain summary info about the cinema of:
  • Bangladesh
  • Bhutan
  • India
  • Maldives
  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
and perhaps more...
Were a South Asian cinema article to exist, you could adopt the same template format I did (I originally copied it from European cinema). I would be more than happy to include references to a South Asian cinema article within this article.
Gram 14:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My point is perhaps a very tenuous one - but basically, what im trying to say is the geographical boundry is purely a man-made construct - for example, Thailand, a heavily Indicised culture, is part of South East Asia - thus it is both East Asian and South Asian in terms of culture and geography - yet nobody would consider defining Thailand in the same catagory as South Asia - an article on South Asian cinema would not include Thailand, Indonesia, or another South-East Asian country, yet your article on East Asian cinema does include those countries. The East Asian name of the article is perhaps well defined - but isnt informative, because of this exclusionary paradox - my point is that it is eaither better to define eastern cinema in different terms (I would actually call it eastern cinema or oriental cienma and include South Asia), or be even more strict in the East Asian definition by removing countries of South-East Asia. India is not a middle eastern country, yet is doomed to be thought of as one, despite the fact that South-East Asia bears more cultural commonality with India than with East Asia, because modern racial profiling, to put it bluntly, classifys India on the basis of the superficial appearance of Indians - non "Mongoloid" as some old anthropologists would put it. Yet what is a human? We are made of our minds not our bodies - thus when classifying Eastern cinema, should India not be amongst its other Eastern peers? A counter argument might be that Indian cinema is stylistically different - yet no more stylistically different than Thai cinema from Japanese cinema. I should point out that above your compared the wiki article on East Asia and South Asia - well those very articles illustrate the problem, since the East Asian one infact dosent include Thai and Malay lands.. Vastu 19:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, when I started this article I asked for assistance in several places, and little was forthcoming, so I carried on in my own vein (albeit with an admittedly limited geographical knowledge). As mentioned, the key film industries in my intended focus were those of China, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea, as films from these countries are becoming significantly more successful in the West. I was able to add Taiwan as it too had a cinema article. I couldn't find any Cinema of Mongolia, Cinema of Vietnam or Cinema of Macau articles.
Some of the info I garnered was from the Far East article, an article, which in its opening sentence says "an inexact term often used for East Asia and Southeast Asia combined". As this article was initially called Eastern cinema I felt this to be the relevant starting point, but since moving the article "East Asian cinema" to be more geographically accurate, I've perhaps been remiss in leaving in countries that are technically in Southeast Asia - Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia (someone else added Philippines).
So the solution I would propose is to be, as you say, more strict with the definition. To remain as geographically accurate as possible we should split this article into "East Asian cinema" and "Southeast Asian cinema". I stand by my assertion that "Cinema of India" belongs in a "South Asian cinema" article. And again, there is nothing wrong with these articles referencing one another.
Geographical boundaries may well be man-made, but they are also universally recognisable. If anyone was willing to do the work, I would argue that a continental "parent" article be written too, entitled "Asian cinema", which could draw together East Asian cinema, Southeast Asian cinema, South Asian cinema and beyond.
And one final point - I created an article entitled Asian cinema purely as a redirect to this article. I concede that this is inaccurate, but did so because in my experience, Americans say Asian when they mean East Asian (wheras Brits are more likely to say Oriental). Similarly, Brits often say Asian when they mean South Asian. If proper articles for Asian cinema, South Asian cinema and Southeast Asian cinema were written, this issue would be resolved and the articles would have more educational value.
Gram 23:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I've gone ahead and created a basic Southeast Asian cinema article and template, and have split the East Asian cinema article and template as appropriate. I had a little trouble with the templates, which hopefully someone will assist with (think I may have created them twice). I've also stopped the Asian cinema article from being a redirect to East Asian cinema, making a very basic stub. I've made reference in each of these 3 articles to South Asian cinema Gram 00:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be the best solution then - thanks for changing it - I will check the new articles out later, and try to help with their content if I can. Vastu 06:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World cinema navigation template

[edit]

Hi Gram. There's discussion going on here, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#New Cinema navigation box, about a box that would go at the bottom of world cinema articles like the ones you started for South American cinema, Asian cinema, etc. There's some confusion and concern about some things, like maybe Cuba and Puerto Rico being better grouped under a Latin Americam cinema article and Turkey's presence in the middle east. Maybe you could add your voice to the proceedings? What do you think? Take care. — WiseKwai 17:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South to Latin America ?

[edit]

Hi Gram123, thanks for giving opinion on the world navigation. I hope you approve of the template as it mentions sub-regions without splitting vertically. Under 800x600 resolution it really hurt. One thing is the South American cinema. Can it become Latin America to include all countries from Mexico down. The merge to "Americas" is maybe not the best, but given the few of countries of N.America, it makes the template smaller. I've started a section for such issues in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#Notes on "Cinema of (Country)" series and would appreciate if you post your opinion there. Thanks. Hoverfish 15:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Eastern cinema

[edit]

Hi Gram, there is plenty of sourced evidence that cinema of Iran/Persia doesn't fall under Middle Eastern cinema. Look in my tak page, if you like, for links to sites and google search results about the issue and if you like take a look about Egypt etc. I am trying to come up with some rearrangments, if possible, so I would be glad to have your opinion on all this. I know we've been through all this in WP Films before, but even so. Hoverfish Talk 23:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite with you in that since we are doing this by geographic boundaries, we should keep it regional. There is no big deal subdividing India to cultural/language zones, like it's no big deal to divide Africa into Arab/non-Arab (or maybe North to indicate Arab countries) for cultural reasons. But when it comes to Asia, I am all for going exclusively by regions. To avoid the Middle East dillema (Turkey is also in this), although a very well-known term, there is the widely acceptable alternative term "Western Asia", which takes in all Middle East (Arab and non-Arab), Turkey and as deep as Iraq (if they had any cinema before "liberation"). But even if we let Middle East as it is (with Turkey in it), Iran/Persia should go to another zone, and since we don't use the generic "Asian cinema" before subdividing, we could place it quite acceptably in South Asian Cinema. Iran, Afganistan and Pakistan are regionally together and they can all be said to be South Asia. Hoverfish Talk 18:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

Hi Gram! Just in case you have time:

I would like to have your comments on my recent work for further improvement. Any suggestion will be very much appreciated. Thanks. Sangak 18:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film template

[edit]

Hi Gram123! There is important talk about the film template. Your opinion would be appreciated in Template talk:Film. Thanks. Hoverfish Talk 09:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New WP Films department started

[edit]

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List and navigation management department has started and you are welcome and encouraged to participate. Hoverfish Talk 08:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:East Asian cinema and Template:East Asian Cinema

[edit]

Hi! I noticed that one of the above templates seems to be redundant. Since you worked on both of them, I think you might have a better idea which one. Greetings, Yaan 19:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for pointing that out. I did a special:whatlinkshere/ on both templates - the former had about 12 links, and the latter only 2. Easiest thing was to amend the links of the 2, so the capitalised "Template:East Asian Cinema" can now be deleted. I had a quick look at some of the other similar templates, and they're not standardised (either in capitalisation or in the actual format of the templates), which would probably be a worthwhile task. I'll note it at Films WikiProject and see if we can get agreed format. Gram123 12:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI Gram. I was considering starting some new Cinema of articles ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 21:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New template

[edit]

Hello, Just to inform you that I have created a new template Template:Jackie Chan films to list most, if not all of the films Chan has starred in. Cheers.--Kylohk 13:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly reminder on British spelling

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you've changed all "rigour" into "rigor" in editing the Jackie Chan article. Please note that the former spelling is the British spelling version, and is recommended since the subject is from Hong Kong, which uses British English. (Hence the spelling should be consistently British)--Kylohk 13:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Kylohk. I'm British myself. The English spelling of "rigour" does indeed have a "u" in it, but we drop the "u" in "rigorous" and "rigorously". I was sure I was right, but then you undid the edit, so this time I spell-checked with a UK English dictionary and also searched Dictionary.com for "rigourously" (no entries). So I'm afraid it's your spelling at fault this time! Keep up the good work. Gram123 13:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit request for Jackie Chan

[edit]

The featured article candidate "Jackie Chan" has had another oppose, calling for another person to copyedit it. So, I'd be grateful if you could provide some assistance. Cheers.--Kylohk 12:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit request for Rob-B-Hood

[edit]

Hello, it's me again. I've been working on the article on the Jackie Chan film Rob-B-Hood, and would like another person to take a look at the prose. If you are free, please copy-edit it. Thank you.--Alasdair 02:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bey Logan

[edit]

You know, I watch a lot of Hong Kong action cinema, but have yet to listen to a Bey Logan commentary track. Then most of DVDs I get are the Hong Kong releases. I guess that's why. The filmography list is as good a place as any to list the Bey Logan's commentaries. Good move. — WiseKwai 14:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through Jon Kennedy and related articles deleting the libelous edits from the articles' histories. I know you have created and/or edited many of these articles. Can you check and see if I have missed any? Please let me know and I'll selectively delete any more bad edits you find. Thanks. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preity Zinta FA

[edit]

Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film template

[edit]

Thank you for pointing that out. I have removed the links and the template has been deleted. Cheers, RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 06:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


FYI

[edit]

The Entertainers (NUFC) is up for Afd MickMacNee (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) MickMacNee (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breakout Native Titles

[edit]

Per your request of 7 Februrary that you left on my alternate talk page — I have reformated those filmographies:

Sammo Hung & Yuen Biao & Yuen Wah

I wasn't satisfied with the default column widths, I use M$ IE7, so I allocated percentages to the columns, depending upon your own browser, you may want to change those numbers.

WurmWoodeT 07:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi, one of the articles I watch, Taegukgi (film), was recently edited by you here, in order to provide links to film articles. I disagree with this change, mostly the second link, because it is not intuitive.

Your edit was to change:

"a [[2004]] [[South Korean]] [[war film]] directed..."

to

"a [[2004 in film|2004]] [[Cinema of South Korea|South Korean]] [[war film]] directed...."

I do not think the words "South Korea(n)" should link to Cinema of South Korea, even though that is the specific aspect of SK we are talking about. It is not logical to have this poorly written sentence as a lead, because without mousing-over, can you guess where they lead?

Lee Myung-bak is the 2008 South Korean President...

Is it 2008 in general or 2008 in Korea? Does "South Korea" link to Government of SK or the nation page for SK? Does President lead to President of SK or President? That sentence follows the same logic as yours. Links have to leave absolutely zero room for doubt where they lead, otherwise it confuses and frustrates the reader. Consider Forrest Gump, which starts off like this:

Forrest Gump is a [irrelevant] based on the 1986 novel of the same name by Winston Groom and the name of the title character of both.

This is an absurd sentence! Besides the stylistic horror of using "1986 novel of the same name" as the link text, it hides the link and isn't obvious. The character link is even worse. Although Forrest Gump (character) is the title character, why don't the words "title character" link to title character (Title role) or even eponym (eponymous)? (Also, it's badly written: the book was named after the character, and the film after the book, but transitive properties are redundant in prose: A is named after B and C, and C is the name of A and B)

Links that say South Korea(n) should universally go to South Korea. The best solution I can think of is to link like this: "it is [[Cinema of South Korea|South Korean film]]" but we lose the "war film" link, and that might produce heckling from another camp. If it is a guideline on the Film Project, let me know and I will bring my concerns there. ALTON .ıl 22:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories and sub-categories

[edit]

Category:Star Wars films is placed in a bunch of genre categories so it doesn't have to be repeated in every single film of the series. That's no different from what I did with the Once Upon a Time in China films. I replaced "Category:Cantonese-language films", "Category:Hong Kong films", "Category:Kung fu films" with "Category:Once Upon a Time in China series" (with itself is in the Cantonese, HK and kung fu categories).--Nohansen (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed in Hong Kong Legends, The Protector (1985 film)

[edit]

I've seen your edits in history on both articles and it helps very well. How would you like if you can help me turn those articles into something interesting to read about. Right now, I couldn't do it alone although I did my best by introducing Hong Kong Legends and added another version in The Protector to make it more interesting to read. I would be happy if you can help 'cause right now it's near impossible to find materials from various websites that I can add to make it worth it if someone decides to research for their homework for example. Answer me in my talk page if you're willing to help. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 23:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes is not a reliable source. IMDB is a much more reliable source and so far Armour of God and Rush Hour 4 are not on there. Stop vandalizing.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.(Planecrash111 (talk) 03:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I'm sorry, I disagree with you. I've been making edits to this article since late 2006. Why on earth would I vandalise it? I understand that you want to see concrete information that a film exists before it can appear in the filmography. However:
  1. Rotten Tomatoes is a valid source and is used in many Wiki articles. The article also seemingly contains a direct quote from Jackie Chan himself.
  2. IMDb is far from perfect - it is flawed and incomplete - I have submitted many corrections myself to IMDb, and it has particular failings when it comes to foreign language films. IMDb can also be quite slow in adding pages for films that have already been announced in other countries. Just because a film is not listed on IMDb, does not mean it doesn't exist!
Please note:
I did not vandalise the article in any way. When you made the original edit to remove Armour of God 3, you messed up the table formatting and a previous editor had lost the article's references. I reinstated the references and fixed the table. I also added back in the films you removed, because you did not provide a valid reason for removal, you simply said "no such film called Armour of God". Anyone can make such a groundless statement, and it appeared to be contrary to the information I had read elsewhere.
To avoid any confrontation / edit-warring nonsense, I have now amended the article, adding a seperate table for films that have been mentioned elsewhere, but are not yet confirmed by IMDb or other English language sites as definitely being in production. This includes cited sources for the information, and I will continue to look for appropriate sources. Hopefully, as these films go into production they can be moved from the "Unconfirmed" table and into the main filmography table.
Gram123 (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB stores every single movie. That is why it is called the "Internet Movie Database".(Planecrash111 (talk) 22:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry to disagree again, but IMDb does not contain "every single movie". Indeed, how could it?
There's no denying that it is a huge database, but there are many films that are not listed on there and some of the information that is included is inaccurate, particularly, as I said earlier, with foreign language film titles. For example, there are a huge number of films listed on the equivalent Hong Kong website (HKMDb) that are missing from IMDb.
If you look on IMDb's own help pages, they say as much themselves. Here's a couple of relevant quotes:

"The information in the Internet Movie Database comes from various sources. Though we do some active gathering of information, the bulk of our information is submitted by people in the industry and visitors like you."

"Given the sheer size (over a million titles and 2.3 million names) and the nature of the information we list, which is often subject to change especially on yet-unreleased films or long-running TV series, occasional mistakes are inevitable"

"However keep in mind that our service is provided for the information of users only. It is not provided with the intention that users rely upon the information for any purposes."

Gram123 (talk) 14:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice pertaining to planecrash111... he basicially seems to be on here to start arguments with members and does not seem to do much as far as being constructive. He is basically a vandal that claims not to be and is impossible to reason with. --Vertigo315 (talk) 03:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a very late reply

[edit]

Regarding your question at the new userboxes page; Nothing happens. People may see the userbox and use it... But you should still categorize it yourself into an appropriate userbox category so it has a higher likelihood of being picked up by others. –xenocidic (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of compilation series

[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Mine: Adam Freeland

Thought you might be interested in contributing your opinion, since you've written for similar DJ series in the past (DJ-Kicks). - McCart42 (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

[edit]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AWB edit

[edit]

Thanks for that, both a combination of bad regex and a half asleep guy pushing the buttons... heh. I hereby make a resolution not to run AWB when half asleep :P neuro(talk) 21:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned non-free image (File:Echo&TheBunnymen albumcover.jpg)

[edit]

You've uploaded File:Echo&TheBunnymen albumcover.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project A.

[edit]

I guess I can try and use that kind of reference although it will take some practice. Although I feel so low, I felt that while the Seinfeld article is very slow in bringing it up into ... how do I put it? Have a high grade to the article, maybe I felt Project A would be a good break away from the Seinfeld article. I'm going to need some help on that so will you give it a shot? I'll find some info on the net and the DVD and you can clean up the article? Also it will take some time so it might drain my brain as well.

There shouldn't be any harm doing this so it's worth a try. Thanks.

Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 11:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Armour of God. Keep up the good work. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 01:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, let's say Lola Forner is in the movie. I only have one question. Which part of the movie in Project A would you see her? I don't know if you own the movie but if you do, you can tell me where to look. The likely nominations is a club which Jackie and Yuen Biao go to, the ship which Dick Wei intruduces himself or it could be else where on the film. Let me know if you did watch the movie. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll give you time to watch Project A as long as you have time either off the internet or on so I'll leave it at that. Message me as soon as you can. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference link for DVD is useful. I don't know about books but it helps. I just need you to clear up what I wrote on the movie and maybe redo the DVD reference. Don't forget to take your time because there's no time limit in Wikipedia. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 11:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job with Project A again. If you have some spare time, I need your help in cleaning up the movies like Iron Monkey (1993) or City Hunter or Game of Death. I do admit that some parts are long. Very long. In the meantime, I'll see if there's anymore that I can add to Project A. If you're good at cleaning up the article than we got a deal. Take your time, keep up the good work. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm fond of working together and so far I'm still brainstorming for ideas. If you have a great idea, go on my talk page so that the way we work feels more smoother and more relaxing rather than combating ideas. It could be any kung fu movie or stars that you want someone to work on. I do admit I have no friends so please, help me out here. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Police Story.

[edit]

In cantonese his character name is Ka-kui. The english dub is Kevin but when I listened in the australian DVD Hong Kong Legend movie, his name is Jackie and I felt there's going to be conflict here. What I mean is whenever I put a material with or without the references, there could be justification to stick to the original version or we won't bother putting anymore information because enough is enough and we will not tolerate changing the information.

So the best is to keep it as an option until there's nothing else left to add and find a way of putting it in. Also the reason I couldn't add it is because you called the behind the scenes "Action" and I know too well how people can be so against trivia so their is no option. I presume the english dubbing from America calls him Kevin and english dubbers from England calls him Jackie so I'm totally lost.

If you don't want to add this info than I'll understand but judging by your talk page, I just don't think your heart is there at all. I don't want to be enemies with you unless you throw me a very harsh message and all I want is some help. You won't believe me now but listen to the english dub in Police Story anyway. Let me know. By the way, I'm having trouble with the reference link in "The Protector (1985)" regarding the audio commentary of Bey Logan and still I couldn't get it right. It works on Project A but maybe I left something out.

If you have time, help me solve these issues. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Authur Wong.

[edit]

For Canton Godfather, Authur Wong is a great cameraman and can always do something with a nothing scene. Like Crime Story and Once Upon a Time in China, he likes to show an area Jet Li's fighting in or after Jackie fell down in the hull of a ship and he uses a handycam to go down from the top of the area. Anyway, hope this helps. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you didn't watch the special features. The camera starts on an overhead shot of Tiger leaving the club then it reaches the top where Jackie takes a glance of Tiger leaving then it moves to the left on a top view shot of Anita singing in front of her dancers. What I'm describing quite clearly that Jackie uses a tracking shot to be able to capture a sequence in one go. If I'm not any more clearer than watch the movie and see a few scenes which uses a tracking shot. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if this is true that Jackie first sings in "The Young Master" then sorry for putting that info in. It was stupid of me for putting that info in but I was wrong. I guess editors are far too reliable about being right and everyone else being wrong. So sorry about that. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 10:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Dragons: Jackie Chan, Sammo Hung and Yuen Biao.

[edit]

I was thinking for a long time and although the only place where I can get info is "The Classic Revisited" in Project A DVD HKL, I'm still figuring out how do I put that info in because it will take a lot of brain power to know which films has all the triple dragons been in or appear in. Also as an option maybe a listed section which the three work together on. I want to put it in but I'm not confident it would work. I just wanna know what do you think before I draft it in. I'm beginning to feel more certain that I would make more mistakes than ever before so help me out here. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 00:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do feel that this is a big ask. I suppose you already know about the history of the triple dragons and I was thinking of adding the info in like Project A, Heart of Dagon etc. but with people being smarter than me, I'm not ready to put it in but I'm leaving this as an option. I'm cooling down on the weekend so you don't have to answer me until Monday if that's ok. So if you have any ideas, any suggestions whether I should do it or not just let me know. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Master (1989 film)

[edit]

I wanna start off if you seen the Jet Li film "The Master". I don't know how stressed you are at this point but you really need to pace yourself. I'm working on it quite slowly making sure the info is right and try to think of things that I can expand on. Maybe you can help me on this while I try to find a way to put in the "Triple Dragons". Maybe make a separate article or something.

Anyway for now, I'm going to input what info Bey Logan has when he's researching for the film. So help me out if you can ... as long as you might remember watching the movie. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 02:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can now check on "The Master (1989 film)". Just don't forget to check the references and see if there is a need to add, change or delete material that doesn't fit with the article. I know editors used "encyclopedic" and there's no other way of saying it. I'm working on "Skinny Tiger, Fatty Dragon" due to its potential that there's room for improvement but I'm not good with cast. I don't remember what site you use to find cast but it might be helpful. So if you don't mind if you can find the cast but if you don't have the time than at least give me a like a site that has helpful info.

This will take time so pace yourself and edit when you have time. I don't know if you like watching movies or what your hobbies were but it will be nice to get to know you at least. Thanks. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Death.

[edit]

I manage to fix a few issues and added the reception. However the reception is not well written because the flaws has already been mentioned on the revised version. I hope you can check the web references and clear up the reception and maybe add Bey Logans name to it. I want to add Bey Logan describing the movie as a good bad movie but it wouldn't work. I've also wanted to add a criticism involving a funeral between the real Bruce Lee and the movie but I'll leave it as an option.

By the way, when you clear up the article, don't forget to check your spelling. Thanks. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 07:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


City Hunter (film)

[edit]

I want you to take a look at the article. I presume for a while you haven't edit it for a while. So I'll simply ask for you to be able to cleanup and check for errors and such. Especially the City Hunter cast and the story. It shouldn't be hard and at least you'll get something to do. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I haven't chat to you for a while. The plot for this movie City Hunter is quite too long and needs to be shorten to at least, uh, a page length. I don't know how long is too long but anyway, make sure you do some drafts and previews before you decide what needs to be taken out and what needs to be kept intact. I'm still cooling down since Christmas and New Years Day. So keep on editing and Happy New Year. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to say this but the plot length in the article is too long. If you have the time, please go to the article and shorten the length of it so it doesn't become too much of a centerpiece. If you're still available, I'll make it worth your while. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 06:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnny. I don't really edit Wikipedia anymore. I haven't really got the spare time to do it, and it's become rather a chore. I only occasionally pop by and check on the odd thing. I've had a look at the City Hunter (film) article and tidied up the wording a little, but if you want to reduce it further, you might want to cut the descriptions of one or two of the less important scenes. Cheers, Gram123 (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MagnificentButcher DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MagnificentButcher DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ATIC records logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ATIC records logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You will see that I posted in the talk page the reasons for the redirect - given that the page had not been edited for 9 Months, there was no indication that any "discussion" was likley to attract any editors, I went ahead as per WP:BOLD. Codf1977 (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion resulted in the logo image becoming orphaned and ultimately deleted, so I've had to submit a request for its undeletion. Articles shouldn't be deleted without any discussion unless they're clearly vandalism / libelous etc, as it gives people zero chance to save them. Removing the contents of the article and making it a into a redirect seems rather underhand to me (and consequently, WP:BOLD sounds like an excuse), as going through the process of proposing a deletion would clearly have taken more time and effort and potentially elicited opposition.
Nevertheless, as you've now gone down the more acceptable route of asking for proof of notability, and better yet, proposing a merge (which sounds like it may be a viable option), I'll look into improving the content of the article. Gram123 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did NOT delete the article, just redirected it - given that the vast majority of the page is un sourced (all but the bit about the release of the second album), there was/is nothing to merge anyway. I am sorry you feel it was underhand, I assure you it was not. Codf1977 (talk) 16:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CrimeStory DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CrimeStory DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OUATIC3 dvdcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OUATIC3 dvdcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Veba (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable musician

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lionel (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HeartOfTheDragon DVD.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HeartOfTheDragon DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knockabout DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knockabout DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OUATIC6 DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OUATIC6 DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EnterTheFatDragon DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EnterTheFatDragon DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonLord UKDVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DragonLord UKDVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ByHookOrByCrookDVD.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ByHookOrByCrookDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PoliceStory2 DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PoliceStory2 DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Policestory poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Policestory poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dual Control has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band, fails WP:BLP as well

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Now, Listen! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article with no claim to notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DJFood&DK NowListenAgain.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DJFood&DK NowListenAgain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FASTILYs (TALK) 01:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WheelsOnMeals DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WheelsOnMeals DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TwinDragons Poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TwinDragons Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BigDadaLogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BigDadaLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ninja Tune logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Tune logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 02:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of How to Cut and Paste Mix Tape Vol.2 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How to Cut and Paste Mix Tape Vol.2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Cut and Paste Mix Tape Vol.2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needing Wiki contribution assistance!

[edit]

Hello Gram123!

I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia "notability" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:

http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble

Let me know if you would be willing to help!

Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com

Devbot (talk) 03:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fat City Recordings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The label is verifiable but does not appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, per WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 23:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FatCityRecordings Logo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FatCityRecordings Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JackieChan'sFirstStrike DVD.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:JackieChan'sFirstStrike DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FirstStrike Poster.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FirstStrike Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HalfALoafOfKungFu.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HalfALoafOfKungFu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SnakeInTheEaglesShadow DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SnakeInTheEaglesShadow DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FearlessHyenaUltra DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FearlessHyenaUltra DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FearlessHyenaII DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FearlessHyenaII DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cinema of Oceania for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cinema of Oceania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema of Oceania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Professorjohnas (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:PoliceAssassins DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:PoliceAssassins DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TwinkleTwinkle DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TwinkleTwinkle DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Astronaut for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Astronaut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Astronaut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I meant to AFD an album, not the band. AFD page deleted. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BoHoFilmsCo logo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BoHoFilmsCo logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BojonFilms Logo.JPG)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BojonFilms Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:D&BFilmsCo logo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:D&BFilmsCo logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GarBoMotionPictureCo Logo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:GarBoMotionPictureCo Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Astronaut for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Astronaut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Astronaut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Darkwind (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Braintax BiroFunk albumcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Braintax BiroFunk albumcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Airside CoverArt.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Airside CoverArt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MyLuckyStars DVDcover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MyLuckyStars DVDcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DJ Kentaro for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Kentaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kentaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lester Foster (talk | talk) 18:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Myluckystarsgoplaces.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Myluckystarsgoplaces.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OUATIC2 dvdcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OUATIC2 dvdcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RootsManuva BackToMine albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RootsManuva BackToMine albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heart of the Dragon

[edit]

Hello
I was interested in reading or writing an article about the 1985 documentary series "Heart of the Dragon". I notice from the edit history of “Heart of Dragon”, that its first edit (by you in September 2006) was a redirect to HotD, which suggests you moved the article that was there before, in order to write the film page.
Can you remember? Is that what happened? It is a redlink now: Can you tell me anything about the article that was there before? Thanks, Moonraker12 (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Useless Wooden Toys

[edit]

The article Useless Wooden Toys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album with questionable notability that has no refs either

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Take My Drum to England

[edit]

The article Take My Drum to England has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album with no notability mentioned or refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JonKennedy TakeMyDrumToEngland albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JonKennedy TakeMyDrumToEngland albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DJKicksStaceyPullen.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DJKicksStaceyPullen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheVictim DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheVictim DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ScaredStiffDVD.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ScaredStiffDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HKCinemagic Logo.JPG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:HKCinemagic Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gonin cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gonin cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonGateInn1967.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DragonGateInn1967.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MagnificentButcher DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MagnificentButcher DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DrunkenMaster DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DrunkenMaster DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShaolinChamberOfDeath DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShaolinChamberOfDeath DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungTigersRevenge DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungTigersRevenge DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonsForever screenshot.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DragonsForever screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Only Child (musician)

[edit]

The article Only Child (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No sources; the only external link is to a bar/restaurant site with no information on the artist. A search turns up nothing except places to buy or listen to some of their works. No indication comes close to satisfying WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC even if sourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ordered from the Catalogue for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ordered from the Catalogue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordered from the Catalogue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OrderedFromTheCatalogue albumcover1.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OrderedFromTheCatalogue albumcover1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OrderedFromTheCatalogue albumcover2.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OrderedFromTheCatalogue albumcover2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Christian (DJ) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Christian (DJ) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Christian (DJ) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mark Rae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. I can't find any refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MakeUsABrew.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MakeUsABrew.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Niko LifeOnEarth AlbumCover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Niko LifeOnEarth AlbumCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MrSCruff BonusBait CD.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MrSCruff BonusBait CD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nodding Dog™ listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nodding Dog™. Since you had some involvement with the Nodding Dog™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tony D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NMUSICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HeavyweightRibTicklers albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HeavyweightRibTicklers albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BonoboAnimalMagic.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BonoboAnimalMagic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BonoboDaysToCome.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BonoboDaysToCome.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HandOfDeath DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HandOfDeath DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DragonFist DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DragonFist DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpiritualKungFu DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpiritualKungFu DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yuen Biao for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuen Biao, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuen Biao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShaolinWoodenMen DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShaolinWoodenMen DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JonKennedy We'reJustWaitingForYouNow albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JonKennedy We'reJustWaitingForYouNow albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Take a Break (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one reliable source, couldn't find any others. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. versacespaceleave a message! 17:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Me First and the Gimme Gimmes - Take a Break cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Me First and the Gimme Gimmes - Take a Break cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 00:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Frying the Fat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, only mention of the album i was able to find in reliable sources were passing mentions of it being the first album by Grand Central Records, nothing in depth

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Grand Central Translation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, the only source i was able to find was a one-paragraph review by xlr8r, nothing in-depth

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 09:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Grand Central Vol. 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, was unable to find any reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Grand Central Vol. 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, was unable to find any reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 11:33, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Grand Central Vol. 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, was unable to find any reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kate Rogers vs Grand Central has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability, BBC ref's good but all I was able to find in terms of additional sources was a review from Raidió Teilifís Éireann, and two sources seems insufficient

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 11:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Underground Crown Holders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, was unable to find any reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Veba vs Grand Central has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, was unable to find any reliable sources other than an extremely brief mention in Hot Press

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentral FryingTheFat albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentral FryingTheFat albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentral FryingTheFat2 albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentral FryingTheFat2 albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentralHouseBag1.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentralHouseBag1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentralHouseBag2.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentralHouseBag2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentralHouseBag3.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentralHouseBag3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrandCentralTranslation albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrandCentralTranslation albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KateRogersVsGrandCentral.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KateRogersVsGrandCentral.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UndergroundCrownHolders albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UndergroundCrownHolders albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Veba vsGrandCentral albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veba vsGrandCentral albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snake&CraneArtsOfShaolin DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snake&CraneArtsOfShaolin DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kate Rogers for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Rogers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Rogers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CiphriusKane (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Shaolin Plot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GrooveArmada AnotherLateNight.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GrooveArmada AnotherLateNight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Useless Wooden Toys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Late Night Tales: Nightmares on Wax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks enough coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JonKennedy UselessWoodenToys albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JonKennedy UselessWoodenToys albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NOW LateNightTales albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NOW LateNightTales albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DirtyTigerCrazyFrog DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DirtyTigerCrazyFrog DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IronFistedMonk DVDcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IronFistedMonk DVDcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article On the Wheels of Solid Steel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Boulevard Connection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet notability per WP:BAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DJKentaro OnTheWheelsOfSolidSteel albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DJKentaro OnTheWheelsOfSolidSteel albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Funky Fresh Few has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Lack of notability is also evident per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kohei Mihara (DJ) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable DJ. Article is poorly referenced, and coverage from reliable sources does not seem to exist. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 00:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Darren Knott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced article. Could not find any coverage from reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 00:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Jon Kennedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable artist. Article is completely unsourced, except for the artist's official website. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 01:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Jon Kennedy albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Uncontrollable Fatulence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject with article tagged as unsourced for more than a decade

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Survival of the Fattest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UncontrollableFatulence albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UncontrollableFatulence albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Life in the Fat Lane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Note that Life in the Fat Lane (novel) should be moved to this title regardless if this is deleted or not as it is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mwwv converseedits 23:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LifeInTheFatLane albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LifeInTheFatLane albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LiveFatDieYoung albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LiveFatDieYoung albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PhysicalFatness albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PhysicalFatness albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SurvivalOfTheFattest albumcover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SurvivalOfTheFattest albumcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]