Jump to content

User talk:Graham87/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13→Archive 15

Blocking Giano II

Do not ever joke block someone without their permission. I would argue that you shouldn't even with their permission. If Giano takes offense at your block you could be in some quite serious trouble. Prodego talk 04:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Incidentally, Graham....did you make sure the autoblock has been lifted? It lasts 24 hours, regardless of the length of the block. Please see to this immediately if you haven't already. Risker (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

(EC) I blocked with the autoblock disabled, so that shouldn't be a problem. I didn't think about the block showing up for three hours though. Yeah I realise I could get into bad trouble with this - I didn't get his permission beforehand. I won't do it again. Graham87 05:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Jenny Was a Friend of Mine

Hi Graham! Would you consider userfying this article for me?

Thanks in advance. (Please reply here) decltype (talk) 09:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Done, it's at User:Decltype/Jenny Was a Friend of Mine. There was a talk page with content, if you're interested in it. Because it was proposed for deletion, you're allowed to move it back into article space at any time. Graham87 09:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! If there's anything on the talk page worth salvaging I would really like to have that as well. decltype (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. The talk page is now at User talk:Decltype/Jenny Was a Friend of Mine. Graham87 11:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. Not much to work with, though. Hopefully I'll be able to dig up some sources to establish notability. Thanks again. decltype (talk) 11:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Please help me.. info on Hereditary Multiple Exostoses needs to be removed!

Dear Graham 87 Besides being webmaster for Dr. Paley... Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (MHE/ MO/ HME) I am The MHE Research Foundation Vice President & National Director of Research Executive Director, The MHE National Research Registry & Coordinator of Clinical Information Liaison Officer, University of Antwerp, Department of Genetics, BelgiumLiaison Officer, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Genetics Unit, Bologna Italy

I clearly know the genetics of the EXT genes and this info is useless. work directly on the geentics of the EXT 1 gene and the EXT 2 gene.

I ahve taken this info down! One mutation on EXT 1 that causes HME is at the 340 codon where arginine changes to cysteine. Genetic Code For Genetic Mutation -EXT 1 Nucleotide Sequence

There are hunreds of mutions in the EXT 1 one gene and the EXT 2 gene.

I am co-oranzing the 3rd International conference on this disease http://mheresearchfoundation.org/MHE_Conference.html and there is video on the genetics of this disease located on the foundations website... The MHE Research Foundations website is the largest in the world for this disease and we are an affiliate of the Glycobiolgy Socitety and many many others... OK Where the referance to heparan sulfate that is Glycoliology...and this is the defect with these two genes that to put it in simply terms make all the signaling pathway within these genetic go wrong...

Please do not undo... what I have done by removing this info...

The MHE Research Foundations website will over 300 webpages long... and if people are looking for detailed info this is where they can find it...

Thanks

Sarah —Preceding unsigned comment added by Szlimblengthening (talk • contribs) 15:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I do not understand the problem , the link goes to an official page with his own blog and music you can listen to on it. Its not advertising, when there's nothing like that there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.134.18.186 (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sleepover

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sleepover, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDICDEF: the article describes a simple concept that is more fitting for a dictionary than an encyclopedia

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DarwinPeacock (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I concur, the page can be made encyclopedic with the proper expansions. I hope you work on adding these! DarwinPeacock (talk) 06:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Homemaker info deleted!!!!

Dear Graham87,

I did an entry on the above subject and you deleated because "it's not encyclopedic; Wikipedia isn't a how-to guide". I don't think my add was a how to guide but a proper addition to the actual information given. The information already available is not really encyclopedic - it states facts. I was also just stating facts. Is it the wording which was not write??????

Thanks to let me know as I would like to understand ccdsb —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccdsb (talk • contribs) 16:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Korydaleus

You removed Korydaleos from the list of Cremonini's famous students because you only got 3 Google hits. Trully, this is the criterion taht an ignorant would use. So, in order to "refresh your memory", read at least the following books:

  • Cléoblue Tsourkas, Les Débuts de l'enseignement philosophique et de la libre pensée dans les Balkans La vie et l'oeuvre de Théophile Corydalée (1563-1646), 2-ème éd. revisée et complétée. Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessalonique, 1967
  • George Henderson, The revival of Greek thought, 1620-1830, Albany: SUNY Press, 1970

You can also check the following articles:

  • Raphael Demos, "The Neo-hellenic Enlightenment" (1750-1821), Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Oct., 1958), pp. 523-541
  • George Henderson, "Greek Philosophy from 1600 to 1850, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 19 (Apr., 1955), pp. 157-165

Another thing: try a Google search on "Korydaleus".

88.177.243.61 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I've just created a pathetic little stub about Theophilos Corydalleus from the German Wikipedia page about him, despite knowing almost nothing about German or philosophy. I've also re-added his name to the article Cesare Cremonini (philosopher). Graham87 07:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Screen reading

Hi Graham, I noticed a small problem with our current stylesheet setup: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18497 This got me wondering again about aural/speech stylesheets. How is the market these days ? Has any improvement been made since last year, or is it still pretty much the same? --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Radiotherapy - External Links

Hi, Can I ask why you've determined my addition of an external link to be spam?? I don't consider it to be anything of the sort. Links will direct browsers to current and well referenced information that is specific to radiotherapy provision in the UK, which is dramatically different to US-based provision. Thanks. Lloyd (talk) 12:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

got your note

Fair enough - though the info contained is clearly referenced to published sources. probably more hassle than it's worth getting into it on project medicine page. it's why things like this will remain unhelpful to non-US residents. Lloyd (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete the external link? There are many Wikipedia articles with YouTube links. These are external links, and it show something relative to the article. Maybe is bothers you personally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fenerty (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Bassoon

Nice "Dance in the village pub", Graham, together with Saint-Saëns the best file there. I like whole that cycle, both style and sound are unusual and the atmosphere is really homely. Thanks for uploading. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia and accessibility

Graham

I am looking at using Wikimedia to host the documentation of an open source eLearning tool called Xerte. Xerte has accessibility features built in and we are concerned that the documentation website / system should also be accessible.

I would be very interested in your thoughts on using Wikipedia with a screen reader or any other accessibility issues you have encountered.

Thanks

Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acs mark (talk • contribs) 11:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Richmond, London

Answer me three questions. What on earth is the point in having a reference to Mills regarding Richmond's identity? Why did you revert to an edit that makes a mess of the previous layout of the lead section (which I created last year [as JHB]) without putting it right? If you are an administrator who is so concerned about Richmond (where I spent the first 24 years of my life) why don't you do something about the peurile Notable Residents section, which is so demeaning that it drags the whole article down to the level of the gutter press? If, however, you think there is nothing wrong with it then don't bother to come back to me, because you will not be on my wavelength - which would not be surprising because you are less than a third of my age.

I have restructured the paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.23.173 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Message moved from this edit to my user page. Graham87 03:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Help please ...

Hi there, Graham. I created the article The Legendary Estates of Beverly Hills - Unfortunately it was deleted March 31st for containing some criteria for "speedy deletion". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legendary_Estates_of_Beverly_Hills) I sincerely regret that it's just now that I'm able to take actions or seek some help. Is there any way that you can retrieve it for me, so I can do the necessary edits? I hope it's not too late. Thank you so much. I'd truly appreciate your help.Jxc5 (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Taken care of. Jay (talk) 21:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

James Joyce/Ulysses

Hi, any reason we should keep this redirect around? I ask as it looks like you did some merge work from there to the "standard" location. I'll watch for an answer here. Thanks (John User:Jwy talk) 20:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Nope, it's just an old redirect from when articles were organised into subpages. When doing this kind of work, I like to keep the old redirects and edits for the sake of completeness, but I have no objection if someone later wants to delete them. Therefore I just fixed the only remaining link to that redirect, then deleted it. Graham87 00:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

GGS

Is looking like its category and sub category are getting a fair kick - any thoughts? SatuSuro 09:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC) My generation are the least seen at anything there (except for the judges and the civil service heads) - I agree with you almost in totality - bar hoping i live long enough to see the more relevant stakeholders (oh how I hate that word) are sufficiently out of legal range to give one hell of an anecdotal lambast as to why the late 60's generation never wanted further to do with the place... enough said - thanks for your response SatuSuro 12:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm trying to get this relaunched; I suspect the best way is just to nominate things: People are much more likely to participate if there's a few options on the page at all times =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. I'll start advertising it round a bit. Probably a good time to nominate anything you want to get added. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Yann Arthus-Bertrand

Hi Graham!

I was looking through the edit history of the article described above, and I saw one of your edits at the top. I can understand you feel that many pages link to it, although the vast majority of these links are just years, basically, so I don't regard the page as adequately linked.

Just a wee message =D

-calvinps- (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Page history anomalies

I got CBM to help me find database anomalies for you. The preliminary data is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CBM/Sandbox&oldid=295091989 Let me (or CBM) know if that's the kind of data you're looking for. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't think that data will be very useful, though. It lists whenever a timestamp is out of order with respect to the revision ids of a page. But the revision ids do not have to increase as time increases, so there are a lot of false positives. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Related: bug 2930. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Twelve Variations on "Ah vous dirai-je, Maman"

Regarding your edit: I think the editor 76.194.164.88 was quite right when she/he included "Twelve" in the bolded part of the title in the article Variations on "Ah vous dirai-je, Maman" — that is the title of the piece. I suppose to make it correct, the article should be moved to Twelve Variations on "Ah vous dirai-je, Maman". A similar but misspelled title exists as a REDIRECT: Twelve variations on "Ah vous dirais-je, Maman". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

FitzGerald

What is with all the page moves on Edward FitzGerald? Was this page move requested? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 13:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see! Thank you for the clarification. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 13:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Inflation move

Hello--It's probably some weird wiki tech thing, but I'm curious why you moved Inflation around. CRETOG8(t/c) 17:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

New Madrid Seismic Zone

I can't quite follow in the logs what you were doing with New Madrid Seismic Zone and New Madrid Fault Zone. It looks like all's in order, so I'm not complaining, just wondering. Thanks. --Kbh3rdtalk 15:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad I asked; I wasn't aware of history merging. Thanks. --Kbh3rdtalk 16:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Levee wall breaks

Do you have a better location for the sentence explaining that the levee wall breaks would not have happened if the Levee Boards had not sued the ACOE to stop them from building the gates? I think that the flooding would have been less than half of what it was if the Levee Boards had not stopped the gates. This is quite important in viewing the overall ramifications of the disaster.

Thanks,

Johnherrick (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Good idea, I will mention it there, Johnherrick (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC).

RFC moved

Discussion moved to Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_page_indexing. Gigs (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

St. Louis Rams/Cardinals

Hi, do you mind if I ask what happened with the two articles above? (Did somebody create duplicate articles?) Just curious, being a long-time St. Louisan (and STL sports fan), and seeing it all go by on my watchlist when I logged in... thanks! umrguy42 17:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you ...

... for taking the time to fix the move of Sumerian Mythology → Sumerian Religion. Much appreciated. Enki H. (talk) 02:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

template:unsigned?

What did you change? I don't see a difference in appearance, only in the diff. Griffinofwales (talk) 01:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Graham87. You have new messages at Griffinofwales's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Griffinofwales (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

recently article renames

Hi, just wondering what all these renames are about, is there some new wiki layout in progress ? --Jor70 (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 

# (Deletion log); 10:53 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) restored "Argentina/Military" (1 revision restored: history merge)
# (Move log); 10:53 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) moved Armed Forces of the Argentine Republic to Argentina/Military (history merge)
# (Deletion log); 10:53 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) deleted "Argentina/Military" (G6: Deleted to make way for move)
# (Deletion log); 10:52 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) restored "Argentina/Economy" (2 revisions restored: restore other edits)
# (Move log); 10:52 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) moved Argentina/Economy to Economy of Argentina over redirect [without redirect] (revert)
# (Deletion log); 10:51 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) restored "Argentina/Economy" (1 revision restored: restore other edit)
# (Move log); 10:51 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) moved Economy of Argentina to Argentina/Economy (history merge)
# (Deletion log); 10:51 . . Graham87 (talk | contribs) deleted "Argentina/Economy" (G6: Deleted to make way for move)
He's been working rather hard on WP:New histmerge list. Those deletions/restores are history merges that he's been working on. It's not that there's a new wiki layout in progress, it's that we discovered a ton of cut-and-paste moves that needed to have their histories merged. Matt (talk) 20:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks and keep up the good work! --Jor70 (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I think you deserve this

The Working Man's Barnstar
I think you've been working harder on WP:New histmerge list than anyone. Page 1 is completely done thanks to you. Keep up the excellent work! Matt (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much! :-) Graham87 00:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Just came here to express my own gratitude to you for all your histmerge work; it's become an almost weekly ritual to see a deletion of yours on my watchlist and shudder "how many deleted revisions had been unattributed!?" Keep it up! Regards,  Skomorokh  15:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your encouragement! I'm constantly amazed by some of the articles I find that need history merging. Sometimes they're on such well-known topics, like London, Melbourne, and Los Angeles, which I enjoy history merging. I also enjoy it when there are many edits to reattribute. Graham87 16:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:New histmerge list

Neoconservatism

Why was this article moved? Soxwon (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Condoleezza - Condolezza - Condoleeza

Out of curiosity, what was all the shifting about of the Condoleezza Rice page for? I nearly reported you as a rogue admin until I saw you return the page to something less defamatory!VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Got you - thanks. (I'm still learning my wikitrade). To be honest, the shameless teenager in me quite liked the subversiveness of quietly changing the web address to Condolezza ;-). VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 06:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Bailey

Graham87,

Am curious why you have included Jeff Bailey as a notable resident for Longview, Washington. He actually lives in Kelso, which is correct on the Kelso, Washington page. Kelso and Longview border each other, in case you didn't know, as you live in Australia. Please let me know why you have done this, before I remove it. Thanks in advance.

Ks03 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ks03 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


Graham87,

Thanks for the explaination!! I should have been more clear about my intentions. Thanks for the response! Cheers.

Ks03 (talk) 19:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

ZOMG light-year

What happened there? I'm not complaining about the current state of the article, I'm simply curious as to why half my watchlist is full of deletions and moves ;) Best wishes Physchim62 (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Just curious

What's happening to Jean-Baptiste Lully??? Frania W. (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I must be a bit "bornée" as I do not see the difference between *before* & *after*. OK I imagine as long as nothing is destroyed. Frania W. (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Merci pour l'explication. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 17:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Moving pages

Since you're clearly adept at moving pages, could you do anything about moving Dion O'Banion to the more correct Dean O'Banion? You can see some reason why on the talk page for the former.Shsilver (talk) 20:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks.Shsilver (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

World Series moves and mergers

Could you explain what you've done with the battery of moves and mergers at Talk:World Series#What articles and discussions have been moved or merged?. Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Stubs icons and Web accessibility

Hello. Since you are working on accessibility, could you take a look a this proposal? Thanks. Dodoïste (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you take a look at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Xenobot 6.1 and ensure I've accurately described the problem? Feel free to amend directly. –xenotalk 18:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Mouth

Wow...that was how long ago? I'm pretty sure I had an admin pitch in on that one. Thanks for the warning, but I don't remember the last time I made a cut/paste move. That may have been my last one. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 17:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks like you were right...it appears I did copy/paste that, based on what you've said and the message I posted in my admin request. Sorry for any confusion it triggered. I've been being good lately, though. :) Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 17:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Got a laugh out of that one, thanks. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 17:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Accessibility question

Hello Graham87, I've been doing some work on MediaWiki's image code, and I have a question for you. If a user inserts an image into a page, but provides no caption or alt text, what should the alt text default to? Please respond at mw:Special:Code/MediaWiki/52726. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

merging page histories

Hi Graham,

Could you explain to me what you did to merge the page histories of the Eo articles? That would be a useful thing to know, but all I see when I look at it is a move there and back. There are several parallel articles where the best I've been able to do is turn one into a redirect. kwami (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

a moment

I was on the edge of my seat, for a moment I got my request fulfilled. Regards, cygnis insignis 16:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Sims Reeves matter

Thanks, Graham. Sorry for the travail of woe I've subjected the project to. Don't know what came over me there. Best thing I can say is "It seemed like a good idea at the time". I've been telling my fawning admirers for years that I'm not actually perfect, and now we finally have what looks like hard evidence.  :) -- JackofOz (talk) 11:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

V5 interface

Hi, I saw a load of moves/deletes for V5 interface and was wondering what you were doing? Nothing seems to have actually occured except a load of delete/move logs? Just wondering as it looks a bit odd. I dont mind an answer here as I typically auto-watch. beardybloke (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

I did a history merge to make sure all the edits are in one place. Graham87 04:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Buckenbowra River

Thanks for cleaning up this and the other precision fix. Should have done those myself. Euryalus (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

No worries, that's just one of my pet peeves with the conversion templates. Graham87 05:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Patrick Pearse

Can you tell me what went on with the Patrick Pearse article yesterday? You don't seem to have been involved in the article before, and it doesn't seem to have followed a discussion anywhere. Obviously everything is back where it started now so there's no harm done, but it didn't half clutter up my watchlist! Scolaire (talk) 06:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Apollo Hoaxes

Hi Graham, when you changed the wide image here the markup was in the wrong order so it tried to display a file by the name of "800px". I've undone it, but I'm not sure what your actual intention was so can't fix it myself. Pedro :  Chat  15:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

That's great - thank you, and thanks for fixing that typo! Pedro :  Chat  15:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Merge

A merge has been proposed for 25/8, you are welcome add your position here • S • C • A • R • C • E • 00:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Jack o lantern

OK, excuse me if I missed something, but why on earth did you move the article on jack-o-lanterns/jack o' lanterns to the title with the least real world usage, Jack o lantern? And siomehow in the process the entire talk page disappearedI've never seen the term with no punctuation at all, so that's probably the worst place that could have been moved to. I saw no discussion suggesting or endorsing such a move. Whatever you've done here needs to be fixed. DreamGuy (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Must have caught it after the merge but before it got moved back to the right place... or a server cache of that having happened. Looks OK now. DreamGuy (talk) 13:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

The novel

sheer interest - why does one need an article The novel - was puzzled about the transaction with which you moved a discussion page... --Olaf Simons (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

What 1337 means

1337=leet.Leet is a internet word.--72.226.80.32 (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC) 

Yes I Do.Do You Want To Be A Vandalizing Remover On Other Wiki's.Well,you will because youve been selected to delete vandalisim for the Vandalisim Be-Gone INC.We Clean Up Vandalisim On Wikis And Put In Real Information In Place Of It So Our Wiki's Can Be Kid-Friendly,because some vandalisim is inappropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.80.32 (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

WFRP

Hi! You did something to Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay; care to explain what happened at its talk page? (Please do not respond on my personal talk page; I'd far prefer if we could have any discussion where people can read it, i.e. here: Talk:Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay#.22History_Revision.22_of_page.3F. Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Foreign language refs on English Wikipedia

Where can I find the policy on the use of references in foreign languages on the English Wikipedia? I ask because someone recently added a very long reference in Russian to the Black Hundreds article. I am not certain whether it should be removed or not. Honestly, though, it does not seem very helpful. So, what is the policy on such matters? Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

In general, foreign-language references are acceptable per WP:VUE. Regards, decltype (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Indeed. Thanks Decltype for the friendly talk page stalking, or whatever it was. :-) Graham87 15:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I am a notorious stalker (of talk pages) :) You userfied an article for me back in April, and I guess your talk has been on my watchlist since then. Regards, decltype (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, thank you both. My problem with foreign language refs is that I have no means by which to judge the validity of the information or the notability of the source. But, in this case, the article previously had no references whatsoever, and I cannot fault an editor who added one. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graham87/Archive_11&oldid=1143029968"