User talk:Graham.Fountain

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leaky bucket/rewrite

Leaky bucket/rewrite appears to be a draft but is actually a live article. Subpages are not enabled in articlespace, unlike user and talk spaces. I have moved it to Talk:Leaky bucket/rewrite. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 09:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fowler and "-ize"

Another contributor has identified for me the subject of your query. You were right, and I have fixed it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited UPC and NPC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Network traffic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QOS

Hi Graham,

When you updated the page on UPC and NPC I see you added a link to QOS. I suspect that this wasn't what you intended as QOS is a disambiguation page? I hope that you don't mind that I have had a go at correcting the link to what I suspect was meant to be the page on Quality of service.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.224.159 (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:1553b fig 10 Data bus interface using direct coupling.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:1553b fig 10 Data bus interface using direct coupling.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Senator2029 (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Graham.Fountain/Leaky bucket/rewrite

User:Graham.Fountain/Leaky bucket/rewrite, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Graham.Fountain/Leaky bucket/rewrite and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Graham.Fountain/Leaky bucket/rewrite during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Triumph TR7 Sprint

An article that you have been involved in editing, Triumph TR7 Sprint, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Network traffic control, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frames and Packets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

here

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 22:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asynchronous Transfer Mode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frames (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asynchronous Transfer Mode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Call (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polywell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Work (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 23:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Graham.Fountain. You have new messages at Fat&Happy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

burstiness

hey man. I don't have strong feelings about the word at all, I was just randomly gnoming (certainly not a word) around and assumed that this was a jargon term. I'm wrong as often as I'm right (almost). From one Graeme to another, if you had a tr7 I'm assuming you like working on cars as much or more than actually driving them. Primergrey (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No probs Graeme.

Actually no, I prefer driving the old rust bucket to working on it. Mind you, it's probably not long for this world, as one front wing is comming unglued and there's less boot gutter than really needed - gawd knows how it got an MoTC; though I've been saying that for 3-4 years now. I've swapped to a 1973 Dolomite Sprint, one of the first batch of black and yellow cars, so there's seats for all the kids, but that's not as much fun. But I'll probably re-create one of the 60-62 genuine factory TR7 sprints as soon as I find a suitable bodyshell: pictures on Triumph TR7 Sprint.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Broadcast information transfer formats.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you!

Graham;

A little while ago, you sent me something ('hanging restrictive relative pronouns "that" to descriptive relative pronoun "which"), and I never responded.

Why am I thanking you?

Because - not only where you polite (a seeming rarity these days), but, you also explained to me something about grammar which I did not know.

All couched in an understanding tone.

B4 writing this, I looked @ your 'User:Graham.Fountain' page, and it gave me a pleasant chuckle - specifically the 'this user lives too far from York to be happy' comment (I'm a native NYC'er; born and am still (mostly) here.

So, thanks again - for teaching me something!

All good wishes,

U.N. Owen — Preceding unsigned comment added by UNOwenNYC (talk • contribs) 14:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AmE/BrE spelling

Thank you so much for that. I will try to comment at more length when (?if) I get a moment, but for now - yes, absolutely! I'm glad we understand each other and I'm sorry that I was unclear about my intentions at first. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I think I should introduce myself. I have a PhD and 7+ years’ experience working in ICF specifically on the National Ignition Facility. I edit a variety of fusion articles, IEC, fusors, Magnetic mirrors, ICF, Fusion power, ect... Our edits conflict sometimes and I think we should try and find a consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiHelper2134 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You prob., saw from my user page that my background is 30 odd years in research in military avionics, mostly real-time systems, data buses, and networks, and writing specifications and standards for same. So, I'm only trying to get the article to read reasonably well, not trying to correct the physics. My interest in the subject is purely as a dilettante. But as such, I do find it fascinating. And, as a result, I’d like to see it as well written as possible. However, unlike things like the leaky bucket or the Triumph TR7 Sprint, I’m not rabid enough about it to get overly stressed.

My feeling about the polywell article is that the lead section could be much, much better. From what it says in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, I infer that the lead section of a Wikipedia article on any subject should be suitable for Fred Bloggs to read, or at least start to, and not just be aimed at the cognoscente. So, in my opinion, most readers coming to the article don’t, initially, really want to know about the polywell’s relationship to the magnetic mirror (they’d stick it on their fridge door and comb their hair in it anyway) and the biconic cusp (Jamie Sommers' décolletage?). The majority will want the more useful and interesting stuff first: what it does, or what it is claimed it could do, and what informed opinion/actions says/implies about how likely that is. So that it is a fusion reactor, the possibilities of net power production and aneutronic fusion, and Bussard’s and the USN's relationships with it, are a bit more significant to me, at least in the context of the first paragraph of the lead section. The later paragraphs in the lead (up to 4 in total) can then outline whatever aspects of the physics are relevant, and to what they relate, and the main body can cover these in whatever depth is appropriate.

Contrastingly, I also think that some of the language in the body of the article tends, or at least has tended, to the kids reading book level. I do understand that it may be a tricky balancing act to avoid the “This article may be too technical…” flag, but the language should at least be above reception class level. I did put a comment about the juvenile language on the talk page a while back, but it seems I’m alone in the opinion.

Graham.Fountain | Talk 14:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting in Singular they

In your recent edit to Singular they you changed the formatting of the title of a 5-page article to italic. Did you consider MOS:NOITALIC and MOS:QUOTETITLE? --Boson (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your question on my talk page ("No, what are they?"):

MOS:NOITALIC (or Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#When not to use italics) states:

Italics are generally used only for titles of longer works. Titles of shorter works should be enclosed in double quotation marks ("text like this"). . . . These include but are not limited to: Articles, essays, papers, chapters, reference work entries, newspaper and magazine sections or departments, episodes of audio-visual series, segments or skits in longer programs, short poems, short stories, story lines and plot arcs; songs, album tracks and other short musical works; leaflets and circulars.

MOS:QUOTETITLE (or Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Quotation marks) states:

Italics are generally used only for titles of longer works. Titles of shorter works should be enclosed in double quotation marks ("text like this"). It particularly applies to works that exist as a smaller part of a larger work. Examples of titles which are quoted but not italicized:
Articles, essays, papers, or conference presentation notes (stand-alone or in a collected larger work): "The Dos and Don'ts of Dating Online" is an article by Phil "Dr. Phil" McGraw on his advice site.

--Boson (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was going by what Ritter wrote in the Oxford Guide to Style. If WP style conflicts, revert it.

'Sokay, I've done it already.Graham.Fountain | Talk 10:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reliability (computer networking), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traffic policing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Triumph TR7 Sprint page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Graham.Fountain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Triumph TR7 Sprint page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Graham.Fountain/Triumph TR7 Sprint

Graham,

I think that your page User:Graham.Fountain/Triumph TR7 Sprint should probably be deleted as it is appearing as a parallel page to Triumph TR7 Sprint, e.g. at Category:Triumph Motor Company vehicles

GTHO (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not have the page deleted because I'm using it to work up changes and find the sandbox too ephemeral. A look at the history will show it's still an active page.

Sorry it showed up in the catagory - that was my mistake copying the whole of the TR7 Spint page in there during a synchronization. I have deleted that part from it.

Graham.Fountain | Talk 09:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Problem solved. GTHO (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The shape of things to come

Thought you might enjoy these British car comics: http://www.boicey.com/comic_pics/theshape.gif http://www.boicey.com/comics.html I like the Special Service Tool comic. Stepho talk 05:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Stepho-wrs:Excelent! I may know a few places they'll be apriciated. I like the oil stains one - though I know my neigbours wished mine were that small.Graham.Fountain | Talk 10:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Graham.Fountain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk:TTEthenret edits

Many thanks for contributions, I have few comments. I suggest specifics and limitations in another chapter. I take you comments as valuable contributions.

Concerning:"However, even where the sum of the allocated bandwidths is less than the capacity provided at every point in the network, delivery is still not guaranteed due, e.g., to potential buffer overflows at switch queues, etc., which simple limitation of bandwidths does not guarantee are avoided."

This is correct but I don'T know any configuration not taking network calculus and buffer sizes into account. Better to say the configuration which maintains defined max latency and jitter always has buffer in mind, otherwise it will never get certified in a real application. Typically you do not load configs which will overflow buffers and create potentially catastrophic consequences. I think this is a text for a chapter on "Configuration rules for RC traffic and AFDX". We can expand with mixed criticality topics later.

My suggestion is to move it into a new chapter on the end or link a wiki page which describes those topics in detail.

Furthermore: " However, time triggered transmissions are necessarily cyclically scheduled and thus delays between processes in the application layer can be large, e.g. with plesiochronous processes, as is observed in systems using cyclic MIL-STD-1553B buses, up to twice the transmission interval due to released packets waiting for scheduled transmission at the source and for the receiving process to run at the destination."

1)This is a special case in L-TTA archiecture you mention - i.e. synchronous nateowk and freewheeling applicationapplicat. 2)In TTA architectures and control systems we can get down to 100µs latency andb 10kHz control loops. Therefore I consider a comparison with MIl1553 not the best one - it is a databus, in contrast switched full-duplex networks have different capability to run multiple parallel streams on different links.

If you are interested we can extend into a chapter on event driven vs time-triggered, and TTA vs L-TTA where those differences can be assessed, but this may be so broad that we need a new wiki page.

Mja7014 (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Graham.Fountain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Data encoding.JPG

The file File:Data encoding.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Remontoire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ford Escort and Ford. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]