Jump to content

User talk:Goofyy ahhh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

those who know: ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€

[edit]

explenation in the comments Shellshockersi (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Albanian atdhetar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albanian atdhetar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Goofyy ahhh (block log โ€ข active blocks โ€ข global blocks โ€ข contribs โ€ข deleted contribs โ€ข filter log โ€ข creation log โ€ข change block settings โ€ข unblock โ€ข checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Greetings, I would like to appeal the block. I read the sockpuppet investigation of albanian atdhetar and I want to point some things out. As my friend, SpeedyHaste mentioned, we are just a friend group. The reason that I created my account when everyone else did is simply because making wikipedia articles became a "trend" in the group chat and I got interested in it as everyone else did. I would like to say that based drenica/albanian atdhetar does deserve the block as he was involved in sockpuppeting, but SpeedyHaste (whom you have unblocked), Shellshockersi and I are legitimately separate people. I honestly wasn't even aware of the fact that based drenica had sockpuppets. I and alongside my two other friends are innocent. Although I understand you, because we did look suspicious.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Greetings, I would like to appeal the block. I read the sockpuppet investigation of albanian atdhetar and I want to point some things out. As my friend, [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] mentioned, we are just a friend group. The reason that I created my account when everyone else did is simply because making wikipedia articles became a "trend" in the group chat and I got interested in it as everyone else did. I would like to say that based drenica/albanian atdhetar does deserve the block as he was involved in sockpuppeting, but [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] (whom you have unblocked), [[User:Shellshockersi|Shellshockersi]] and I are legitimately separate people. I honestly wasn't even aware of the fact that based drenica had sockpuppets. I and alongside my two other friends are innocent. Although I understand you, because we did look suspicious. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Greetings, I would like to appeal the block. I read the sockpuppet investigation of albanian atdhetar and I want to point some things out. As my friend, [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] mentioned, we are just a friend group. The reason that I created my account when everyone else did is simply because making wikipedia articles became a "trend" in the group chat and I got interested in it as everyone else did. I would like to say that based drenica/albanian atdhetar does deserve the block as he was involved in sockpuppeting, but [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] (whom you have unblocked), [[User:Shellshockersi|Shellshockersi]] and I are legitimately separate people. I honestly wasn't even aware of the fact that based drenica had sockpuppets. I and alongside my two other friends are innocent. Although I understand you, because we did look suspicious. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Greetings, I would like to appeal the block. I read the sockpuppet investigation of albanian atdhetar and I want to point some things out. As my friend, [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] mentioned, we are just a friend group. The reason that I created my account when everyone else did is simply because making wikipedia articles became a "trend" in the group chat and I got interested in it as everyone else did. I would like to say that based drenica/albanian atdhetar does deserve the block as he was involved in sockpuppeting, but [[User:SpeedyHaste|SpeedyHaste]] (whom you have unblocked), [[User:Shellshockersi|Shellshockersi]] and I are legitimately separate people. I honestly wasn't even aware of the fact that based drenica had sockpuppets. I and alongside my two other friends are innocent. Although I understand you, because we did look suspicious. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Goofyy ahhh (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]