User talk:GoingRampant/archive

On Posessives and Contractions

According to Possessive pronoun, the possessive form of "it" has no apostrophe, either between the t and s, or as a suffix to the word. I saw this in Banshee (Halo). BonzoESC 18:22, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Right, I fixed it. --OGoncho 18:26, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Funny, somebody called me on the same thing a couple months ago. C'est la vie. BonzoESC 18:32, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Halo reference

You've recently made a number of edits and additions to pages in the Halo universe. Let me know if you'd like to help me out with some of these pages. Or was it just a passing fancy? :) LockeShocke 13:41, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)

I set up a little /directory of my user page. Swing by, if you don't mind: Make contributions to WikiPedia's pages on Halo. Click here.

Sure, I'll do what I can. --OGoncho 21:10, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

7 Halos?

Are you sure there are 7 Halos? Oh, well I guess thinking about it now I wouldn't be surprised, with Bungie's obsession with the number 7. I just thought I remembered 2401 or 343 talking about "The six installations" sometime in Halo 2. Maybe this is at the very end after the countdown has stopped and he says "the other six installations [have gone on standby]." Quick someone go beat the game and watch the end cinematic and report back :) LockeShocke 02:46, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

I sencerely remember seven at least being implied if not spoken outright, I will check, though. --OGoncho 03:39, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I just beat the last level. When asked what Halo does, 343GS says, "Well, collectively, the seven..." before Tatarus interupts. --OGoncho 04:43, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

You beat me to it, I was just about to post that. Haha... LockeShocke 05:06, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

It took you guys that long to beat halo 2? Bonus Onus 00:48, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Engineer

Hey, thanks so much for posting that picture of the Engineer from halo. Did you find that picture online or did you mod the game and take a screenshot? I was going to do that, because a while ago I made a mod where the engineer was swapped in, but it looks like you beat me to it. Bonus Onus 01:49, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

I found a screenshot from someone else's mod here. Also, I noticed the same shot being used in this Bungie employee's slide show.--OGoncho 08:55, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Aha. interesting. Its a nice picture. Usually in the game, the engineer would like fall into the ground. Bonus Onus 00:47, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Crayak.jpg

It this really an image of Crayak? I don't remember seeing this image on or inside any of the books. → JarlaxleArtemis 00:42, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, I found it in my Animorphs folder and assumed it was a real picture, but I guess it was probably some fan-art I found and liked. Should the image be removed? --OGoncho 03:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think it can stay. → JarlaxleArtemis 00:24, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Yeerk.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Yeerk.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Image:Elgoonishshive grace.jpg

Image Tagging for Image:Penitenttangent_halo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Penitenttangent_halo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MAC Cannon

Why did you delete the Halo category from MAC cannon? I think it deserves a spot. DevastatorIIC 16:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Because it already has "United Nations Space Command" which is a subcategory of "Halo". If this has been an error on my part, I apologize. --OGoncho 23:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

You removed the title of the article from the first sentence of History of Ireland. Please note that the Wikipedia Manual of Style suggests the opposite:

If possible, make the title the subject of the first sentence of the article (as opposed to putting it in the predicate). For example, write "This Manual of Style is a style guide" instead of "This style guide is known as the Manual of Style". In any case, the title should appear as early as possible in the article — preferably in the first sentence.

I reverted the change, but you might want to read the whole manual. Thanks for your contributions, and happy editing! --Craig Stuntz 13:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry. I just thought it looked a bit awkward. --OGoncho 02:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, OGoncho! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 19:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nesk

Could you please specify where or when Katherine Applegate specifically stated that the Nesk are the predecessors to modern ants?--Lkjhgfdsa 21:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From here. "What happened to The Nesk? Been to a picnic lately?" --OGoncho 22:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Lkjhgfdsa 00:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

You have been chosen for your

Likeness of Halo
Activeness
Clean record

I would appreciate it if you could lend us an opinion at Template_talk:Halo. Thanks,

Image tagging for Image:Crayak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crayak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I Imagine you know who I am. Just thought I would say hello. -Ed! 04:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ed. --OGoncho 06:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bmw logo02.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bmw logo02.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Shannernanner 04:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Thanks

I just want to thank you for deleting those Ilovebees external links being leading to unnecessary sites. I was thinking to myself, Should I even thank you?, but then it's always great to give someone an encouraging message, seeing that discouragement is abound in Wikipedia. --JDitto 07:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I believe that was A Man In Black. --OGoncho 07:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Haha. Delete this section if you want. --JDitto 06:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Halo

Wikiproject Halo
Call to Members

In order to streamline and coordinate further improvement to Halo-related articles, there is an active roll call to all Wikipedians who put themselves down as participants. To show your continued involvement in the project, simply go here and sign your name. If you do not wish to be active, et al, simply ignore this notice and you will not be bugged again. Thanks, David Fuchs^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)}

Notability of Vegemorphs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vegemorphs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vegemorphs seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vegemorphs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you hit the nail right on the head. Re: The Two-Million Pool

As you can see here, you are quite a prophet because we will reach 2,000,000 articles today. How did you figure it out? I'm amazed. Have fun! --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 06:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for winning the Wikipedia Two-Million Pool from me too! JIP | Talk 08:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the pick. Mbisanz 08:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 08:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Now you just need to guess the 5,000,000th. Crazy Eddy 12:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the risk of sounding redundant and unoriginal, congratulations! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 16:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are now considered a god here... even the one million guy wasn't right on... --IAMTHEEGGMAN 17:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, OGoncho! Isn't there a barnstar for things like that? A.Z. 18:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, cool! It's my savta's birthday. She's 98, BTW. --OGoncho 03:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's a savta? I don't think you mean SAVTA. JIP | Talk 07:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that it means "grandmother". A.Z. 07:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a Jewish term. --OGoncho 08:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. JIP | Talk 08:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I will be the last straggler to figure out who I need to consult on WP:CBALL issues.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for correcting my embarassing spelling mistakes on the Stargate article. Try as I do ... my spelling is never up to my own standards. I am appreciative for your work. LonelyBeacon 03:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It's really Firefox that helped me out, though. It's got a spellchecker for every field of text. --OGoncho 07:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Visser Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Visser Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dhana cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dhana cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Areyonga Desert Tigers

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Areyonga Desert Tigers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Areyonga Desert Tigers is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Areyonga Desert Tigers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Talk:Dexter (TV series)#POV-heavy Plot section

I've dropped a response to your NPOV concerns for this article on the article's talk page. This is just a quick note, in case you're no longer watching the page. -- Andrew Mill (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided - one is April 8 (Wednesday) starting at 6 pm and the other is April 18 (Saturday) starting at 10 am. (Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration.) Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 13:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talk • contribs)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello OGoncho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

James Farlow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kendi Oiwa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elgoonishshive grace.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elgoonishshive grace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Chaosisland-gamecover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chaosisland-gamecover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dhana cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dhana cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OGoncho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Annika Irmler listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Annika Irmler. Since you had some involvement with the Annika Irmler redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, OGoncho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OGoncho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Sunnydale Syndrome" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sunnydale Syndrome. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 25#Sunnydale Syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 20:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"2531" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2531. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#2531 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Carotenemia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Carotenemia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Carotenemia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hiroizmeh (Talk | Contributions) 23:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]