User talk:Godissupreme

Speedy deletion nomination of RG Foundation

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on RG Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RG Foundation with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RGF. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 18:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Godissupreme (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worthy Editors, i have re-written my article [1] with maximum correction i could do.Please help me if it still needs improvement? Thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RGF. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajput Ganpal Foundation. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Petiatil. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajput Ganpal Foundation with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Petiatil^»Talk 04:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Rajput Ganpal Foundation. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Rajput Ganpal Foundation. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 19:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please could you take a read of the reliable sources policy before adding any more content to Wikipedia. I have just had to revert several of your recent edits because they use hopelessly unreliable sources for verification. For example, www.jatland.com is a wiki, www.worldstatesmen.org has been discussed at the reliable sources noticeboard and this is a forum.

Sources must be authoritative and independent, for which reason I have just removed your contributions at (for example) Rajasthan, Vikramāditya, Beas River and Ganpal. A further reason for removing is that you effectively copied and pasted the content from one article to the others. This is ok provided that you note in the edit summary (a) that it is a copy and (b) from which article it is copied - doing otherwise is a breach of Wikipedia's license conditions. Still further, the contributions all related to Ganpal, and since Ganpal has an article there really was no need for quite so much detail in all of the other articles - it is what links are for.

Sorry about this but the reliable sources policy is absolutely fundamental to Wikipedia and is indeed one of the Five Pillars. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have just (again) remove your unreliably sourced contribution to Rajput. Please will you acknowledge that you have read and understand the reliable sources policy. - Sitush (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... and now I have just had to do it again at Ganpal. I notice that you have had similar problems with your article currently at AfC. What is it that you are not understanding about the policy? I can help you but only if you are prepared to meet me halfway. - Sitush (talk) 20:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ganpal

The article Ganpal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot determine if this article is about a person, a place, a family name, a community or whatever. The now-deleted sources (unreliable) cast no great light on the subject matter.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sherry Group Pakistan

The article Sherry Group Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Group of companies for which notability appears not to have been established. Claimed turnover is nothing special and is just that: a claim. Plenty of paid-for adverts in directories etc but difficult to find anything independent etc per WP:RS. The intent of this article may well be a purely promotional.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources at Ganpal

I have had to revert your recent addition of sources to Ganpal. You used one which was published by Gyan, who are a known unreliable source and should not be used. Your other source was a "book" that quite clearly states it gets its content from Wikipedia - this would be a circular reference and it is therefore invalid. Sorry. - Sitush (talk) 08:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gandal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

At Ganpal and elsewhere you are still insisting on adding inappropriate content and/or sources. I have tried to explain things to you and offered my help but you do not respond. Any more of this and I am afraid that it may be necessary to seek a block of your editing capability in order to give you some time to read the relevant policies. Sitush (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Godissupreme. You have new messages at Sitush's talk page.
Message added 01:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sitush (talk) 01:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherry Group Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Group Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Group Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ganpal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ganpal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganpal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Godissupreme/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 23:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Millermk90 (talk) 06:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Umerali2204 (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Godissupreme, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 05:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Godissupreme. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by heather walls (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: I think we may have solved the problem.

Hello

I have been looking for information about the Articles for creation page Mehr_liaqat_hussain_jalvi.

There is a published page Mehr Liaqat Hussain Jalvi. Can you please check this page and see if it is the same person.

If you need more help please do come back to the "Teahouse" where we are happy to help.

Hello, Godissupreme. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 11:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 16:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 02:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have already created an article in Wikipedia's main space about this person, so I suggest you improve that article, rather than submit another one to 'Articles for Creation'. If this person was an elected member of Pakistan's National Assembly he may meet WP:POLITICIAN notability requirements, but you will need to provide proof of this. Sionk (talk) 11:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mehr Liaqat Hussain Jalvi

The article Mehr Liaqat Hussain Jalvi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable from the sources provided, nor from the sources provided at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mehr_liaqat_hussain_jalvi. I've been unable to access the relavence of the arabic-language references, since this subjects arabic name is not given.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr Liaqat Jalvi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 12:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr liaqat hussain jalvi, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr Liaqat Jalvi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehr Liaqat Jalvi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]