User talk:Gluonz
2023
[edit]June 2023
[edit]Welcome!
[edit]Hi Gluonz! I noticed your contributions to Computer security and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 14:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
2024
[edit]January 2024
[edit]Talk:Communist state move discussion
[edit]Hi
Would you please participate in the move discussion at Talk:Communist state. I already do know that you don't approve of the current name title. I don't really have anything against it, but people refuse to link to the proper page, which means that this title doesn't work at all. TheUzbek (talk) 13:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry, I had been looking at the discussion but I’d found it quite difficult so far to solidify a formal opinion on it. Personally, I think the title “Marxist-Leninist state” would be satisfactory,( I mainly opposed the existing title for the oxymoron,) though I can understand where you are coming from with your proposal. I can probably participate soon, once I’ve come to an opinion on the matter. Thanks! –Gluonz talk contribs 15:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]Incomplete IP message
[edit]Go 154.80.118.161 (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
y0
[edit]how u doin Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- ?
- I believe that I have been alright. Why are you asking? –Gluonz talk contribs 15:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- i took a mushroom and im vibing with that glowing thing signature Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]Requested move for Twitter article
[edit]- Your opinion on this issue is requested
You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 23:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Education Auditor: What is the notable development? The domain name change? –Gluonz talk contribs 23:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would prefer not to answer that as it may influence your opinion, which is more valuable from a neutral perspective. The user submitting the move request has shared a detailed rationale in favour for the move. Additionally, Masem also has submitted a counterproposal that is regularly mentioned. This may be the final move request and it appears that there might be a rough consensus for an article called X (social network) so I thought it appropriate to notify everyone. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 23:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]"World War 5" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect World War 5 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 2 § World War 5 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Soviet space program
[edit]Hi Gluonz, have no problems with your changes to the Lead of Soviet space program however you have broken multiple existing links in the references with your changes, hence I reverted your change. Unfortunately I do not have time to fix the links, if you can fix the broken links then would have no problem with you changes. Ilenart626 (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. I think that I have fixed that issue. –Gluonz talk contribs 17:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
CrowdStruck
[edit]Hello, fellow BSOD enthusiast! I saw you express a preference against using the term "IT" in the title, and I'm curious about your reasoning and thoughts on each alternative. If you don't mind, please weigh in by replying to this comment. Jruderman (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind, you've already done so. I really should have reloaded the discussion to before submitting my comment here. Jruderman (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- You can keep or delete this now-pointless section, up to you. Jruderman (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries! –Gluonz talk contribs 20:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
An information technology blessing for you!
[edit]Jruderman (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:CURRENTSECTION" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Wikipedia:CURRENTSECTION has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Wikipedia:CURRENTSECTION until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]Nomination of Roblox Studio for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roblox Studio, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roblox Studio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule
[edit]Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates
[edit]Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.
Here is the schedule:
- October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
- The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
- Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
- The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
- The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
- Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Discussion phase
[edit]The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.
On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Voting phase
[edit]The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for November 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Protests against Donald Trump
- added a link pointing to Presidencies of Donald Trump
- The Resistance (American political movement)
- added a link pointing to Presidencies of Donald Trump
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Standard Notice: Syrian Civil War
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)