User talk:Giphted
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of The Comic Book Guide
[edit]Hello Giphted,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Comic Book Guide for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Meatsgains (talk) 01:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The earth is round
[edit]Whether you want to belive it or not, the earth is round. It will stay that in Wikipedia. Any attempts to change this will be seen as Vandalism. 78.94.53.130 (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize factual posts just because you disagree. Wikipedia is not made for your to bully, discriminante and bigot those you disagree with. Thanks!
Flat Earth
[edit]Please do not reinsert your edit, try to get agreement to it at Talk:Flat Earth. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
You guys are reverting my edits. That is against the Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not revert my edits because you disagree. Thanks
- Your edits violate Wikipedia:Fringe theories and are therefor rightfully reverted. 78.94.53.130 (talk) 11:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
[edit]Your recent editing history at Flat Earth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 11:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Please do not bigot, hate and discriminate against religious doctrine and beliefs. Wikipedia was made for factual posts not bullying. Thanks.
- Wow. I tell you about a Wikipedia policy and you accuse me of hate, bullying and bigotry? Seriously, that's a bad idea. Please read assume good faith and [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks. Your hidden comment was also inappropriate. As I said, take it to the talk page. Doug Weller talk 11:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui 雲水 12:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
Giphted (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I feel as though I was unfairly blocked and this is my request to be unblocked. I understand I was put into what is called an "Editing War" - I felt as though I was adding valuable information that was not yet found in the article regarding flat earth. I got a warning about editing other peoples posts or something when all I did was add what I felt needed to be added. The current flat earth theory is built around religious beliefs and I was attacked by someone saying that the earth will always be round. The information I added to the Wikipedia article was on the basis of those religious beliefs. To not have this information included in the article seems a little bigoted so I mentioned that when people kept deleting the information. I honestly do not understand what the point in the article about Flat Earth is, if the basis of the movement is not allowed and always deleted from the posts. It says the talk page is not about personal opinions but apparently the Wikipedia article is? Just because other users do not believe in a flat earth model, does not mean it shouldn't be allowed to be displayed, regardless of their beliefs. The flat earth page should be for just that. The Flat Earth. Not what others feel or believe about it, but what it's based on factually. If this is not allowed, then so be it. I will not place my edits into the article. I just do not feel I should be punished for posting my edits and then get told I am editing other peoples stuff when I didn't edit their stuff. I believe this is what I was blocked for. If this is incorrect please let me know. P.S. I am not a sock puppet created to break the rules and policies of Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
None of this is relevant apart from your claim not to be a sockpuppet. This is inaccurate; you've previously admitted to being a sockpuppet, here. As such, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. I am revoking talk page access. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.