User talk:Ginsterama

Sockpuppet

This editor is a sockpuppet of User:Daffyduck1234, also known as User:Sandboxxxxx BMK (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Betty Boop has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Betty Boop was changed by Ginsterama (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873507 on 2014-03-26T23:23:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buddy red bow

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buddy red bow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victoria d'orazi

The article Victoria d'orazi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria d'orazi

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Victoria d'orazi. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may as well stop...

...since no edit you make is going to go unreverted. BMK (talk) 01:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Phil philmar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BMK (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]