User talk:George Leung

Welcome!

Hello, George Leung, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 07:29, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bluegrass music, "mouth harp"

Mouth harp can often refer to Jew's harp, but I have never heard it refer to a harmonica. It is listed as an alternate name for both instruments, and the Mouth harp page has been changed several times between redirecting to one or the other (I changed it to a DAB page). Cmadler 12:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SFU computer

Yeah, I'd figured that it was an SFU account. With only a couple days to go before The Peak publishes I'm not so worried with "bad" material creeping into the article. Come Monday the article can be cleaned up and the citations looked over. Inevitably this is going to attract a bunch of attention by people who are more and less aware of Wikipedia's editorial guidelines, so cleaning up periodically is the best that can be done. I'm feeling like letting people have a bit of slack to "mess up" a little, since sometimes some very good changes are made then, and the not-so-good can be corrected.

I don't know if it's necessary yet to lock Vanessa's page. Usually locks are only done on user pages at the user's request or when the vandalism is extreme. We'll see how it goes—I have her page on my watchlist. In the meantime just reverting any vandalism should be enough. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatic Approaches

I was editing the section "Pros and Cons" under "Chromatic Harmonica" and noticed a sentence of yours which contrasted two different "approaches" near the end. I couldnt find a referance to these previously in the article, so i thought you could either add one or remove the sentence. thanks Urukagina 05:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Steel 2

Red Steel 2 has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing reliable sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on the 2006 slip up in 3DO page.

Thanks! I had about a billion things going on while I was working on that. BcRIPster 05:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 10:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

You said: "if this can be deleted, so can many other articles for Star wars and Star Trek" and then went ahead and nominated Luke Skywalker and A-wing for deletion. Don't nominate articles for deletion unless you really want them to be deleted. Tizio 11:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that in nominating Luke Skywalker for deletion you are disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. If you are dissatisfied with a deletion result there is deletion review, however this is only if you believe there is a valid reason for undeletion. I apologise if I came over harshly, you may not have known about that guideline, but please in future consider the effect your actions may have more thoughtfully. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 12:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As James said, don't nominate an article for deletion to try and prove a point. The RX-78 crisis has been mostly averted. There is no point in trying to get retribution now or ever -- it makes all of us who are fans of the Gundam multiverse look childish. Maikeru 18:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Well, at the moment I have no plans to nominate any more Gundam articles for deletion; and certainly not without getting consensus to do so first. I agree that it's time to let the smoke and dust settle a bit and work towards improvements on Gundam/anime articles rather than whacking them.

Ironically, my concern isn't actually notability, at least not fully, and I do understand the point that not notable in the UK (where I am) or the US does not equal not notable. After all, we are at Wikipedia written in English, not the Anglocentric Wikipedia. The only cases where I could really discern lack of notability was where the article told me itself: "Hey! Look at me! I'm non-notable" - that is, it said that the weapon in question only appeared on 1 episode of the video game or the anime, or whatever. Then I can discern notability. But otherwise I can't.

My main beef with most of the articles was that very few of them actually asserted notability - that is, real-world notability. Some of them did not even assert notability within the Gundam universe! That's actually a WP:SPEEDY deletion criterion. Added to which most of the articles had no references to support whatever assertion of notability they might contain, so problems with WP:V. Just to clarify: it was this, and not non-notability, that got me making those AFD and PROD nominations.

As to future course of action, I fully plan to spend time over the next few weeks helping WP:GUNDAM and WP:ANIME - which I suspect suffers from many of the same problems - sort themselves out. Quite apart from anything else, I'd feel an awful rat if I nominated a whole bunch of your articles for deletion and then scuttled back without helping to clean up the mess to opera, where I don't have to worry about lack of notability 99 percent of the time. So I have got a conscience about the thing, and I will help. Furthermore I do enjoy reading these Gundam/anime articles, many of which are very interesting, and it's amazing the amount you can learn just by reading Wikipedia.

Anyway, I hope, this answers some of your wonderfully civil - rare enough these days, so thank you - questions. Cheers, Moreschi ^Deletion! 12:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Anime Evolution

Your edit doesn't really fit with the article per se, but where did you get this information? Speaking as a former executive, I can certainly tell you that your comments about the SFSS and Anime Evolution are completely incorrect. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 17:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Lang (poet)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sarah Lang (poet), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Kla'quot 08:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bible -- material on violence

Hi. I moved this material to Talk:Bible because, for the reasons I gave there, I think it's likely that the local newspaper article is not describing the research's conclusions, and degree of confidence about them, reliably. Would it be possible to provide a reference (on-line if possible but any reference available) to the actual paper publishing this research? This would permit reliably verifying the article content. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the original article has been found and identified. Give me a courtesy 24 hours and I'll double-check the article and put the material back edited if I think the research hasn't been accurately described. I'd note that in addition to saying more about the nature of the instrument used and why the researchers believe it to correlate with aggression, we'd also need to, for example, clarify that these passages are ones that these researchers characterize as violent -- Wikipedia can't present interpretations of the Bible as fact, and hence can't present as fact that these passages are violent, or that the acts they describe are crimes. Added this comment to Talk:Bible. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi George,

In the article you've put a few "see below" comments to references. I've cleaned it up for you a bit, and I thought I'd let you know how you can use a reference multiple times.

What you do is that you put <ref name="unique name tag"> in stead of just <ref> in front of the first reference. At the other places you want to place a reference, all you have to do is place <ref name="unique name tag" /> behind it and it will make a reference to the same as above.

A complete explanation on references can be found on Wikipedia:Citing sources#How to cite sources and Wikipedia:Footnotes.

Feel free to ask if you have any more questions ;-)

Cheers JackSparrow Ninja 07:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quintain link

I have removed the external link you added to Quintain, partly because I found the level of advertising (and pop-ups) objectionable, but mainly because the site contains rather a lot of nonsense. For example, it describes the Destrier as the most common warhorse (blatantly false) and 24 hands high, (impossible: try 14-16 hands for a medieval horse). A quick skim through other sections showed inaccuaracies and complete nonsense in food, torture, feudalism etc. I'm mentioning this as a friendly warning: don't use the site for your own research, as you will need to check everything to separate fact and fiction. Who knows how so much misinformation was collected in one place.(grin). Gwinva 10:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epbr123‎

Hi, George. I appreciate your concerns with Epbr123‎, and share them, but AnonEMouse has told me that deleting sections from your talk page-- though questionable-- is not officially prohibited. So I wouldn't recommend getting into any kind of edit-war with him over this. Dekkappai 22:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

LaMenta3 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I think we all need it :) LaMenta3 03:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citizendium versus Wikipedia (oh my)

Let the controversy begin. The cabal. Thanks for your informative vote. I can see the news headlines now... Lol. :) - Mr.Guru (^talk/_contribs) 19:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have significantly expanded the text of the article. Explore your thoughts. Think long and hard about your vote. Hmmm. :) - Mr.Guru (^talk/_contribs) 04:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad's The Secret Agent

Hello! I've noticed you recently added some detailed information about Theodore Kaczynski to the article on Joseph Conrad's novel, The Secret Agent. It seems, however, that you forgot to include a reference. In accordance with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, this needs to be included, otherwise your contributions to the article may have to be temporarily removed from the page. --Todeswalzer|Talk 00:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wii homebrew and potential conflict of interest

Hi! Since you added a major section to the Wii homebrew article, I was wondering if you could weigh in on an issue in the article. Editor GeekRecon wants to add information about his Javascript SDK for the Wii, but I removed it for lacking notability. (It's not even released yet, nor does his site appear to be mentioned anywhere else.) However, I am the author of a similar toolkit for Flash programs on WiiCade. Thus the editor is concerned about myself having a conflict of interest. That's a fair argument, so I was wondering if we could get a few impartial editors in to evaluate it and give a yay or nay? See the Talk Page for more info. Thanks! Jbanes 03:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic songs dedicated for China

Are there any references that support the notability of this event in English, e.g. reported in the English HK media? Shame on me but I can't read Chinese :( At the very least, an article on the English wp should not have sentences written in Chinese in it. Thanks. enochlau (talk)

Fender Wikiproject Proposal

Hi, I have proposed a new Wikiproject for Fender. If you are interested, please add you name here. Izzy007 Talk 21:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Akatsuki members

The List of Akatsuki members AfD you participated in has been brought to deletion review here. Please take a look if you're interested. — xDanielx ^T/_C 19:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fender WikiProject

Hi, I have seen your edits on Fender related articles and thought you might be interested in joining the Fender WikiProject. Izzy007 Talk 21:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi. Yeah I like meeting new people so when I see someone I don't know I say "Hi". Pleasure to meet you.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 23:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Dance With Intensity

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dance With Intensity, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dance With Intensity is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dance With Intensity, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prism: Guard Shield

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prism: Guard Shield, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Prism: Guard Shield. Marasmusine (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent page move

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Squids'and'Chips 19:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not put it as Nunnally Lamperouge/ Nunally Vi Brittania

Hello, I've notice that you've renamed the title from Nunally Lamperouge to Nunnally Vi Brittania...why can't you just put the title as Nunnally Lamperouge/ Nunally Vi Brittania. Because the character was introduced as Nunnally Lamperouge, & changed as Nunnally Vi Brittania in R2. An as you know the english dub was released...So can't you just change the title as Nunnally Lamperouge/ Nunally Vi Brittania. SilentmanX (talk) 21:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RHEL/CentOS from RHL/Fedora

Hi. Just saw the comment on your edit. Yes, those details are on the RHEL page, but they are also unreferenced. My main point is that although I know that RHEL and CentOS are derived from the baseline Fedora distribution available at the time (a source on the Fedora article says just this), there is no proof from either Red Hat or the Fedora Project that suggests this exact mapping of Fedora -> RHEL/CentOS. That is what I was contesting. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 06:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vizard

We don't know how he's doing it though, so it's just a half-completed thought until they reveal the cause. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 16:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Hats

I am going to make changes to the Cowboy hat page see:text

-oo0(GoldTrader)0oo- (talk) 09:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OrDrumbox

The article OrDrumbox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. No assertion of notability made. The only web-sites that mention it are download sites

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pit-yacker (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XM-X Crossbone Gundam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XM-X Crossbone Gundam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XM-X Crossbone Gundam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, All Along the Watchtower, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on Shangdi

I have revert some sock puppet edits back to your edits. However, I do have to agree that it's a bit too Christian oriented, even though it is the current definition. Please remember NPOV for your future edits. 206.226.72.140 (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kozo Nakamura concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kozo Nakamura, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Superman

Please do not edit-war at Superman. As a longtime editor, I'm sure you know that protocol after being reverted is to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. C'mon. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you would rather edit-war than discuss the issue at the talk page. This is the required warning that you are approaching WP:3RR.--Tenebrae (talk) 02:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

trackless trolley page.

You've made a number of contra-factual changes to trackless trolley. Please address this on the talk page there before re-adding these assertions. Anmccaff (talk) 16:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your last edits border on mere vandalism. Anmccaff (talk) 00:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, George Leung. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests.
Message added 01:49, 15 August 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Don't modify other's signed writing

...without making it clear you have done so. Better still, don't do it at all. Anmccaff (talk) 19:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous edits on Trackless trolley

Your last couple edits could be interpreted in two different ways, one of which was completely inaccurate. Anmccaff (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Your recent editing history at Trolleybus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please remember that (1) any four reverts, manual or automated, violate 3RR even if they're not the same material and (2) that you don't have to violate 3RR to be engaged in edit warring. You have had 4 reverts today (August 17 at 16:25, 16:38, 18:05, and 18:35) and are subject to being blocked, I'm not going to report it unless it continues but you need to stop removing material inserted or reinserted by another editor right now and start discussing it on the article talk page instead of engaging in dueling edits in the article. You also need to provide sources for any material which you introduce or restore. TransporterMan (TALK) 20:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, George Leung. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PLAMO KYOSHIRO HELP FOR REASERCH

My Desire for this Manga is so grate that i started my own reaserch on it. I have months looking for information about the manga and asking for help with the translation. Does someone here have scanlations of Plamo Kyioshiro? I know the manga's concept but i haven't read it yet. Im the full author of the article of Kyoshiro in the Spanish wikipedia (PLEASE DO NOT DELETE!!!) I will give my self to this proyect, because the things i have found are the base stone of the franchise.I have found links to interesting sites in japanese. PLEASE I BEG this comunity for the name of char!!!

Does someone in this comunity has Scanlations of Plamo Kyoshiro? do you know someone? if some one has the scanlatiosn and a big heart this is my email

rickelectro@gmail.com

thank you for hearing this

--Cheposo (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PLAMO KYOSHIRO HELP FOR REASERCH

My Desire for this Manga is so grate that i started my own reaserch on it. I have months looking for information about the manga and asking for help with the translation. Does someone here have scanlations of Plamo Kyioshiro? I know the manga's concept but i haven't read it yet. Im the full author of the article of Kyoshiro in the Spanish wikipedia (PLEASE DO NOT DELETE!!!) I will give my self to this proyect, because the things i have found are the base stone of the franchise.I have found links to interesting sites in japanese. PLEASE I BEG this comunity for the name of char!!!

Does someone in this comunity has Scanlations of Plamo Kyoshiro? do you know someone? if some one has the scanlatiosn and a big heart this is my email

rickelectro@gmail.com

thank you for hearing this

--Cheposo (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, George Leung. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, George Leung. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ibanez ZR

Hello,

I came across an article you started a long time ago, the Ibanez ZR. Is there a possibility that you could put a couple of sentences near the top that tells just what the thing does, and how that is significant? Best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ibanez ZR

The article Ibanez ZR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, no sources here or to be found on Google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbinebri (talk) 01:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]