User talk:Georebekah

Thanks

Thanks for adding the photo of Rebekah Jones. I made some edits to make it properly fit in the infobox and also added a few more details there. Welcome to Wikipedia! ␄ –Nucleosynth (t c) 22:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Nucleosynth Is there a reason there's a notoriety flag on my page?

June 2020

Hello, I'm Junior5a. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rebekah Jones—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 22:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey There. Can you please add that back? "Whistle-blower" is in literally every single story about me, and is the reason I was initially catapulted into the public sphere. I didn't launch the second website for weeks after. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georebekah (talk • contribs)

@Georebekah: I agree that 'whistle-blower' should be mentioned in the article and added it to the lede. But please do review the Wikipedia policy page at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help#Editing the article yourself. ␄ –Nucleosynth (t c) 22:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single-purpose account

@Georebekah: your contributions suggest this is a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account focused solely on Rebekah Jones. Moreover, your Wikipedia account name is identical to the Twitter account of Rebekah Jones. If you are editing your own BLP, you should declare as much at Talk:Rebekah Jones. NedFausa (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what that means, but I didn't create this page. I'm just making sure my education and experience are properly cited.

~~He's wondering if you are the real Rebekah Jones Nithin^talk 02:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)~~ This was an inappropriate question to ask per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Avoid outing Let me refrase... Do you have an undisclode connection to Rebekah Jones?[reply]

If that is the case, then editing your own Wikipedia page would be a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Instead request edits using Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI. Nithin^talk 02:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Georebekah, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Georebekah! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Georebekah. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Rebekah Jones, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Nithin^talk 02:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jp×g 🗯️ 09:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Rebekah Jones) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. jp×g 🗯️ 01:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To reiterate: article subjects should refrain from editing their own articles, and make edit requests on the talk page; in this case, the appropriate location would be Talk:Rebekah Jones. In the future, please request edits there, using the procedure outlined at this link. jp×g 🗯️ 01:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]