User talk:Gbrown@xmn.com

Non-free use disputed for Image:EX3CUT.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EX3CUT.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:EX3CUT.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EX3CUT.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 20:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Examiner Corporation

A tag has been placed on Examiner Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ∅ (∅), 01:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EX3CUT.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EX3CUT.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - ∅ (∅), 16:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Great Restaurant

H. Thanks for adding all that updated material to the America's Next Great Restaurant article. I know you don't edit that often, but two points need to be made about this content:

First, sentences end in punctuation. There is no reason to omit periods at the end of them.
Second, the sources you cite for the material must support it. The TMZ page you cited makes no mention of Woods considering a lawsuit. In fact, it says that he was hammering out a settlement with Chipotle, and in searching for a substitute source, and the September 27 Star Tribune article you cited indicates that they reached. As for the Facebook pages you cited, they make no mention of any Brooklyn Meatball Company restaurant being constructed in Housgon, nor any Tiffin Box in planning stages for New York City.

I've copyedited the material, and moved it down to its own section, while summarizing it in the article's Lead section. I also tried finding replacement sources that support those two locations, and found that on NBC's site, exit interviews relating to the show indicate that Galuzzi and Kandula are pursuing their concepts, even though they make no mention of specific locations being planned or constructed, so I cited those sources, but removed mention of those locations. I also added this material to the Soul Daddy article. However, if you find sources that do mention specific locations being planned or constructed, feel free to re-add that information, while citing those sources. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your username

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Gbrown@xmn.com) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is of an Internet address (such as a web page or email address), which is generally not permitted. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. elektrik SHOOS (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the time Gbrown@xmn.com created this account (January 16, 2006), the username policy did not prohibit e-mail addresses as usernames (link to January 2006 policy).
The present policy includes a grandfather clause, which allows e-mail address usernames that were created before the policy was changed. This is applied in the case of User:Rms125a@hotmail.com, and it most likely should be applied for this user. — This, that, and the other (talk) 12:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]