User talk:Gardener123
Welcome
[edit]
|
Welcome
[edit]A warm welcome from me, too. I wanted to thank you for your many valuable contributions. Having had a look over some of your edits, I suggest you give these two pages a quick read:
- Help:Minor edit (I haven't seen a single edit that was "minor"; short of reading this page simply do not tick that box)
- WP:BAREURLS, and in particular the section "what is wrong with bare URLs?"
Thanks heaps. Keep up your good work. If you have any questions, please ask (here is good). Schwede66 04:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for both of these.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Duncan Hall School has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Noahfgodard (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Maureen Worsley has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Maureen Worsley (November 18)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maureen Worsley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maureen Worsley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Gardener123!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 11:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivor Vivian (November 18)
[edit]{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Ivor Vivian|cv=no|reason=v|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=Needs a few more [[WP:RS] and then it should be OK to accept. Subject passes WP:NPOL. There is an issue where the article mentions Maureen Worsley and then continues with an unnamed Walsh. Which is the real person?|sig=yes}}
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paterson Park has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivor Vivian has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dan arndt (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Maureen Worsley has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Dan arndt (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for November 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Blackburn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Finn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for noticing this. There were so many links! I will tidy it up.
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anglican Diocese of Ballarat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Melbourne.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St John's College, Morpeth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Canberra and Goulburn.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Newton, Norfolk
[edit]Thank you - a really interesting read. I've done some work to the referencing to try and allow us to reuse references without having to spell them out in full each time. Take a look and see if I've done it right. I've tweaked the reference style a little: by all means change this if you hate that way of referencing. I wonder if the Barker book has an ISBN we could add? Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comments and edits. I'm not really bothered about what format the references take - I know there are lots of different ways of doing them. I've checked the Barker book but they just published it themselves and it doesn't have an ISBN. Thanks for the nice comments about the article. I just felt a bit sorry for Newton, it is a bit neglected, even compared with other lost villages and towns. (Gardener123 (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC))
- Yes, quite. You encouraged me to get my copy of Alan Davison's book out - but it's not in there at all, which is a shame. Maybe the county border element. I've added some approximate coordinates which seem close enough - but may need to come south a little. What do you think? Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
I suppose Davison's book doesn't cover it because strictly speaking it is not a deserted village - it is lost (to the sea) rather than lost (abandoned). The only other reason I can think of is that it is in historic Suffolk not Norfolk. But this is what I mean - nothing much out there at all, so I had to pull the strands together a bit. Gardener123 (talk) 08:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your edit, improving the information on past clergy at St Bartholomew's Church, Armley. I hope that in the future, some more of these characters get articles of their own. The list is a good start for this set. Storye book (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
Refname
[edit]Hi - hope you don't mind me tinkering with your ref format at St Mary's. Using a ref name has a couple of advantages - first, it makes the references section less cluttered, since you don't get the same source being repeated multiple times; also, it will not appear in the 'named references' drop-down list in the 'Cite' tools, so each time you want to use it again, you can easily select it from the list. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, it's helpful, thanks. I never quite remember to do it! But it always looks better when it is changed to that. Gardener123 (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Gardener123
Thank you for creating Brunswick Park, Southwark.
User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for the article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JW 1961 Talk 19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Joseywales1961: Thank you. What a nice comment! You probably know the answer to this question - if you type in Brunswick Park, Camberwell, it goes to the Camberwell page. There isn't actually anything on the Camberwell page about Brunswick Park. I wasn't going to rush to put anything in, as there isn't anything about parks generally, apart from Camberwell Green, which is a bit different anyway because of the history. So I think it would be better to make Brunswick Park, Camberwell redirect to Brunswick Park, Southwark (the London parks are listed by London Borough, not parish / suburb). Do you know how to do that? Gardener123 (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Gardener123, I came here after noticing your article about the St Germans & Looe Railway, for which many thanks. I have edited Brunswick Park, Camberwell to point to Brunswick Park, Southwark for you - you can see the change I made here. DuncanHill (talk) 11:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks!
- Hi Gardener123, I came here after noticing your article about the St Germans & Looe Railway, for which many thanks. I have edited Brunswick Park, Camberwell to point to Brunswick Park, Southwark for you - you can see the change I made here. DuncanHill (talk) 11:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
St Germans & Looe Railway
[edit]Wow, I'm surprised there are still British railway lines without articles on Wikipedia. Thanks for your work in creating St Germans & Looe Railway and the station articles. Its an unbuilt line I had never heard of before today. NemesisAT (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- @NemesisAT: Hi, thanks for that. I was amazed too. I suppose it is because it was never finished and brought into service, but there are plenty of articles about other unbuilt railways, and this is more interesting than most. There's very little written about it generally.
Redirects
[edit]Hi - just to let you know that I added a couple of redirects for your new page Anglican Board of Mission - Australia, so that you can use the former names as links and not have to pipe links to the article name in future. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Laterthanyouthink: Thank you!
Sandwich at Priest's Way
[edit]Hello Gardener123, thank you for your work on Priest's Way. I noticed that the image placement is in what is called a 'sandwich position' where two images squeeze the text between them. We usually try to avoid this (per MOS:SANDWICH). If you have the time, consider changing the page layout. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
[edit]Thank you for your recent articles, including Marcin Wicha, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here Hi, thanks for this. I've not really looked much at Talk pages before, but I think I understand what you are saying, and I've looked at some of the pages and I think I see what you are getting at! 09:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Message about Margery Kempe
[edit]Hi Gardener123, I have been asked by a friend, who would like to be involved with developing the Margery Kempe article, to contact you with this message:
- Greetings from Norwich and King's Lynn!
- I do hope you don't mind me contacting you but I'm assisting the Team Rector at St Margaret's, to build on Margery's legacy at King's Lynn Minster in addition to my own post-doctoral research on MK and wondered if I might be of any help to you with the Wiki page on MK?
- I spent last week in the BL working on Add MS 61823, the BMK, and, in addition to recently completing a 60+ page Bibliography on Margery herself, now have copies of the newspaper letters and articles from the 30's and 40's re the BMK, and am helping a colleague rewrite the BL catalogue entry on MK.
- With all best wishes and looking forward to hearing from you.
If you could reply to me, I can pass your reply on—I can also tell my friend how to become a Wikipedian! He will quite understand if you feel unable to help him. Thanks, Amitchell125 (talk) 12:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Amitchell125: Hello! Greetings to both of you in Norwich and King's Lynn. This sounds like very exciting research. Very happy to help - a few thoughts come to mind. First of all, material on Wikipedia is not supposed to be original research - but of course the newspaper letters and articles from the 30s and 40s when the BMK was (re-)discovered are not original research, and can certainly be used as source material for Wikipedia articles. The BL catalogue entry will be useful once it has been edited. Second point is that it is easy enough to become a wikipedian - you set up an account at the top of the wikipedia page. Third point (related slightly to the previous one) is that, amazingly, the Margery Kempe page has been a bit contentious in terms of some of the edits - look at the Talk page for the article plus also View History. I mean, she seems uncontroversial to me (and I am really not bothered about whether she was a Lollard or not, or any of the other controversies!), and I just think it is delightful to have an insight into late mediaeval spirituality, especially lay and female, plus also someone for Norfolk to be proud of, but that does not seem to be a universal view. So I would suggest that your friend start as a Wikipedian with making some edits to some less controversial pages, eg local church buildings etc, or King's Lynn itself, as the MK page is probably not one I would recommend for someone very new to it. I haven't done too much to the MK page - mostly on Richard Caister, which just seemed to me to be a bit of an omission from it. Does this help? Will the Bibliography be published? Will you include in it copies or extracts etc of some of those articles? Happy to email directly, that might be easier. Gardener123 (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Gardener123
Thank you for creating Bill Jacob.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Gardener123
Thank you for creating RNLB Sir William Arnold (ON 1025).
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Mark Hyatt moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Mark Hyatt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mark Hyatt
[edit]
Hello, Gardener123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Hyatt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Hessenford railway station for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hessenford railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
JMWt (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Ways to improve Grand Hotel (Locarno)
[edit]Hello, Gardener123,
Thank you for creating Grand Hotel (Locarno).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi, nice page. Please make sure to rewrite in your own words when using copyrighted sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Broc (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mark Hyatt
[edit]
Hello, Gardener123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mark Hyatt".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)