User talk:Gapfall
Gapfall, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Gapfall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
May 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wandle Park has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wandle Park was changed by Gapfall (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865751 on 2017-05-27T07:22:43+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Bot fighting
[edit]Thanks for persisting- these vandalism patrol bots do make a lot of embarrassing false positives. ClemRutter (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Seems fair, I was a new user apparently deleting a lot of content! --Gapfall (talk) 08:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Crystal Palace circuit
[edit]Hello,
Thanks for adding the photo'. However, that is the end of the back straight with ramp bend in the background. It's the part between the swimming pool and ramp bend. The start finish straight was on the other side of the circuit where the site of the pits and paddock can still be seen (though mainly demolished). Regards, Eagleash (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for responding. I think there may have been some changes to where the start / finish was at some time. I think it was changed post-war when they built the new link (from the 'glade' section to the back straight) and closed the infield link. However, I will double check with the books I have and edit accordingly if necessary. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Abbey Gardens edit
[edit]Thanks for the edit, but you created a link to the wrong Bakers Row. LoopZilla (talk) 12:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, realised my mistake immediately afterwards and thought I'd gone back and fixed that, looks like I just reverted the wrong photo on the Bakers Row article. Thanks for catching it. --Gapfall (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Cheers! LoopZilla (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Humber Street Gallery
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Humber Street Gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Humber Street Gallery has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~Kvng (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for October 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chapter Spitalfields, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portobello (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foster Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Woodward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed your PROD on the article: Rescassa. This article erroneously stated it was a farm, but it is infact a populated place designated as a hamlet. See https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/getoutside/local/rescassa-cornwall which backs this up. This makes the article notable under WP:GEOLAND. I really don't know why it was changed to say it was a farm, it may simply have been an error caused by the fact there is also a farm there of the same name. This diff shows it originally (and also incorrectly) said it was a village. It was changed to (correctly) say it was a hamlet, see diff. and then changed to (incorrectly) say it was a farm, see diff. I have now corrected it and added a reference. Dysklyver 14:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
RAF articles
[edit]Hey, Gapfall. Just to let you know that I have undone your edit at RAF Snaith. All RAF articles have the double explanation on them, it was something agreed eons ago. However I really appreciate the inclusion of the photo and I also agree that the photo you have put in for the River Don is better than the one before.
Any questions about any of this, then respond here as I am watching this page. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm afraid I've removed the image you added in September as it is not of Wettern House but seems to be of the AIG building in Altyre Road, (you can see Altitude 25, which is at the junction of Altyre- and Fairfield Roads, in the background). The original file at commons says 'East Croydon Station, looking south' but W. House was in Dingwall Road which runs along the western side of the station area. I have also raised the matter at Commons village pump as to whether the extracted file should be deleted. Also W. House was demolished in the mid 2000s (per article): was definitely not standing in 2010 (per caption). Just wanted to let you know. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Eagleash: Thanks for catching that, looks like you're absolutely right. I was looking for a Commons image containing what I thought was Wettern House from other sources online, but must have gotten my wires crossed somewhere. --Gapfall (talk) 13:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- No problem. I've wanted to add an image for some time, but despite having worked in the building, I do not have one of my own. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 13:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gapfall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Couper Collection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ravenspurn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry IV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Rubik's Cube
[edit]Re: Rubik's Cube - quite right, very sorry, I was confused! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.183.108 (talk) 18:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Norwood Lake and Grounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blood worm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gapfall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)