User talk:Gaby273827362863

Conflict of interest

Hello, Gaby273827362863. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Blue links without arrows after them can only be "made" by internally wikilinking the name, but not the URL, of an article that exists on the English Wikipedia.

That is, to produce the blue link without an arrow that you want, you would have to type [[Instituto Aeroespacial de El Salvador]], and we would have to already have an article at that title in English on the English Wikipedia. You can't make a wikilink by typing [[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instituto_Aeroespacial_de_El_Salvador]], because that's an URL, not a name — and you can't make a blue link that leads to the Spanish article instead of an English article, because the entire point of the English Wikipedia is to provide information in English.

It's not a matter of "considering" or "not considering" anything, it's just how links work:

Spain is a blue link because there's a article in the English Wikipedia at that title,
ingufkfkl is a red link because there isn't an article in the English Wikipedia at that title,
[1] is an offsite link with an arrow after it because it's trying to use an offsite URL instead of the title of an article in the English Wikipedia.

You're also not allowed to insert links to other language Wikipedias into English articles. Most readers of the English Wikipedia do not read or understand Spanish to get any benefit out of reading the Spanish-language article about a topic — so the wikilinks in English Wikipedia articles need to be to other English Wikipedia articles. So to make Instituto Aeroespacial de El Salvador into a bluelink without an arrow after it, your only solution is to make an English article about the Instituto Aeroespacial de El Salvador. Bearcat (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bearcat,

Thank you for your prompt and thorough response; it precisely addresses the needs and is clearly articulated.

At this stage, it is important also to clarify a related matter regarding the potential creation of a "blue link" for the English version of the article. Specifically, if we translate the Spanish page on the: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instituto_Aeroespacial_de_El_Salvador

Will this action be permitted by Wikipedia?

Currently, the link is available only in Spanish. If the same references, content, and links to create the English version are used, would that comply with Wikipedia's guidelines? Additionally, would it be appropriate to create a sandbox for this translation?

Your guidance on this matter is important. Thank you once again for your assistance!

Best regards, Gaby273827362863 (talk) 07:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bearcat,

I hope this message finds you well. I would like to request your support to explain my situation to Yamla and request a double-check in order to reactivate my account. Here are the details:

A few days ago, I sent a message to inquire about how the "blue links" are created. In response, I received two replies titled:

Conflict of Interest
Links

The first response, "Conflict of Interest," did not address my question, while the second response, "Links," clearly explained the procedure and steps for creating these links (the second response was yours).

To clarify, I have been typing my page/article in the Sandbox, as this is a way to practice before submitting a real publication or requesting a review.

I want to emphasize that there is no intention to violate any policies or create an article against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I sincerely appreciate your support and understanding. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I believe Yamla user perhaps believe we are doing something against Wikipedia policies but actually this is a practice page/article that of course it being continuously improved before an official publication or request for official review.

Best regards,

Gaby273827362863 (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yamla,

This is to request a review over your decision to block the user. Actually the article is in the Sandbox section and the question was just about to translate a page from Spanish to English to know if it is possible to translate a page or not).

Could you please reset your blocked policy and then the page will be sent for review? again, there is not violation, everything is typed in the Sandbox. Gaby273827362863 (talk) 21:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We start discussions after you declare your conflict of interest, as you were required to do and as you were told to do. See WP:COI. --Yamla (talk) 21:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yamla,

The information in this section is written as a draft in the Sandbox to improve any major or minor changes before asking for suggestions to publish, in addition per suggestions of Wikipedia policies to get familiar with the editing. At this point, there is not such kind of release of the page or conflict of interest, I just asked you "if it is possible to translate a page that exist in Spanish to be translated into English because want to get familiar how to use the blue links" that's all.

Could you please amend this decision?

Thanks! Gaby273827362863 (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you are unwilling to discuss your conflict of interest, there's nothing more to be done here. --Yamla (talk) 02:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yamla,

I hope this message finds you well. I would like to explain my situation and request a double-check in order to reactivate my account. Here are the details:

A few days ago, I sent a message to inquire about how the "blue links" are created. In response, I received two replies titled:

Conflict of Interest
Links

The first response, "Conflict of Interest," did not address my question, while the second response, "Links," clearly explained the procedure and steps for creating these links.

To clarify, I have been typing my page/article in the Sandbox, as this is a way to practice before submitting a real publication or requesting a review.

I want to emphasize that there is no intention to violate any policies or create an article against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I sincerely appreciate your support and understanding. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards, Gaby273827362863 (talk) 08:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gaby273827362863/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Gaby273827362863/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yann (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]