User talk:GDJackAttack1

This is GDJackAttack1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3-Acetylpyridine draft 1 (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:3-Acetylpyridine draft 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GDJackAttack1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gasket coil (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NOTHOWTO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gasket coil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation & Education Professionals draft 1 (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation & Education Professionals draft 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everything is a Lot (Will Wood Album) Draft 1 (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everything is a Lot (Will Wood Album) Draft 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everything is a Lot (Will Wood Album) Draft 1 (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NALBUM, thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everything is a Lot (Will Wood Album) Draft 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sketches 3d moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sketches 3d. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Thank you for doing this since I am a new creator. GDJackAttack1 (talk) 16:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Etudes (Andrew Horowitz album) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Etudes (Andrew Horowitz album). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! I will use the draft submission instead! GDJackAttack1 (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Etudes II (album) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Etudes II (album). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bliss, Alberta (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bliss, Alberta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Liu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tom Liu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:49, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Etudes (Andrew Horowitz album) (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Etudes (Andrew Horowitz album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Etudes II (album) (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Etudes II (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everything is a Lot (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everything is a Lot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mansourieh Island moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mansourieh Island. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 23:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Îlots de Bitch moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Îlots de Bitch. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guissanor moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Guissanor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Île de Barbagueye moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Île de Barbagueye. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of islands

Hi! Small islands where the only thing known about them are their name and coordinates aren't usually notable, and need more than a single source to establish notability. Please do not create batches of many short articles like this, and feel free to look at the notability guideline for more information. Good luck! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Île de Kousmar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Île de Kousmar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nosy Kisimany moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nosy Kisimany. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Petra Tou Limniti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Petra Tou Limniti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kikkertavak Island moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kikkertavak Island. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islands articles

Hey there, welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here and decide to stick around. Thanks for contributing :)

I've converted a couple of articles you've created to drafts (see notices above). You may wish to take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). This is a Wikipedia policy about which geographic features can be included in the encyclopedia. In particular, it notes that unpopulated places (like a couple of the islands you've created articles for) are not necessarily notable.

Give me a shout if I can help at all! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:21, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawaii: Part II (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only sources added since the last time this draft was declined are not independent of the album. Sources ned to be independent to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hawaii: Part II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009 Logan Creek, MO tornado

The article 2009 Logan Creek, MO tornado has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication why this would be a specifically notable tornado with sustained coverage, and not just a WP:NOTNEWS subject. And by the way, did this tornado really survive for 24 hours?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it was part of the derecho. the tornado outbreak lasted for 24 hours. not the tornado. thank you for understanding! GDJackAttack1 (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009 Logan Creek, MO tornado

The article 2009 Logan Creek, MO tornado has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If it wasn't listed in a tornado archive, it's probably not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 21:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand the reasoning now! Thank you for explaining. GDJackAttack1 (talk) 11:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isopod etymology

Hi! I saw you added some etymology to an article about an isopod (Trichorhina acuta). The information you added may be correct but no sources are cited. Could you add one? Thanks in advance :)

Regards, SirBrahms (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove it if you want! I don't know why I didn't put sorces. GDJackAttack1 (talk) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Cave Cay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Cave Cay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Cave Cay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Base Line Cay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Base Line Cay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Base Line Cay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Cay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Cay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Cay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spring Hill Landing Strip moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Spring Hill Landing Strip. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hypoxylum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hypoxylum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypoxylum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

William Avery (talk) 12:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/sъtvarь

The article Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/sъtvarь has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be better suited for a Wiktionary entry, and should be moved there. Unlike its sister project, Wikipedia doesn't have the "Reconstruction" namespace, so this doesn't really fit here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciations

Please be aware that generally, we only include pronuctiations for things which are challenging in some way. Giving IPA pronuctiations for things like "Snow Hill" does not improve the encylopedia... we assume our readers have a basic comprehension of the language. Per MOS:PRON, under the "Appropriate use" section, it says, "For English words and names, pronunciation should normally be omitted for common words or when obvious from the spelling". Marcus Markup (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New genus articles

Hi GDJackAttack1, thank you for your recent interest in creating fungi articles. In the article you started for Kentrosporium, the source you provided (MycoBank) lists Kentrosporium as a junior synonym of the genus Claviceps, so I have redirected the article to that existing title. This is the same situation as the title Hypoxylum which was also redirected to its senior synonym after first being nominated for deletion. Please check and thoroughly read the sources first to ensure that the title is not just a junior synonym. As five other editors had weighed in to improve Kentrosporium and several others to improve and then investigate Hypoxylum at its deletion discussion, you can appreciate that all that effort could have been avoided had you checked the validity of the taxon before starting a new taxon.

Should you have any other questions regarding fungi articles, you may find the (Wikiproject Fungi) a useful resource. Loopy30 (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DN2A moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to DN2A. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

M2 motorway (Republic of Ireland) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to M2 motorway (Republic of Ireland). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Montana Secondary Highway 300 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Montana Secondary Highway 300. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Route 2 (Hanshin Expressway) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Route 2 (Hanshin Expressway). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]