User talk:Furminger
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 04:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
---
Signature
[edit]You need to first login. When you do, placing ~~~~ in any talk page will display your signature. Do not sign materials in articles. All material you submit is placed on the public domain under the GFDL. See Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 15:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Great work
[edit]κύδος (Kudos) on the excellent work at Calligraphy#Calligraphy_Today. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Calligraphy
[edit]Hello,
I made this : Calligraphy#Western calligraphy
According to a French book :
- V. Sabard, V. Geneslay, L. Rébéna, Calligraphie latine, initiation, ed. Fleurus, Paris. 7th edition, 2004, page 8 to 11.
I think this historical overview is a good starting point about western (latin) calligraphy, but you seem really more experimented that me on the subject, and it may be good to correct and improve this section, especially to add 5 sentences explaning "What are the feartures of Western calligraphy" and 5 sentences about modern artistic calligraphy, as the last evolution (but don' t make it too long). Then, to work further, it is need to expand the Western calligraphy article.
If yourself, or one of your friend may contribute to this serie, that's welcome !
--Yug (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, it's better to use several books, and you are welcome to add sources to the current Western section.
- But we are here [in the article Calligraphy] doing a presentation, an introduction with a basic level. Your text was too "expert like" and too long for this "Calligraphy" article which have to introduce with a friendly level about 8 to 10 kind of Calligraphies. Your contribution had here a level too hight for the local need. Your long and expert text is more welcome in a specialized article.
- The situation is ambarassing for me since I'm perfectly conscient that you have an really better level than me on this issue, but we need a short introduction, overviewving the main historical styles, the currents development, and the tools only. Other modern consideration are too expert for this place, while they are perfectly welcome in the article Western calligraphy.
- Your contribution was not put in the best place but is really good, I just moved it to the more accurate place.
- In the student role, I please you (the "teacher") to understand this situation and that I acted in the way I sincerely think to be the best way to do. Yug (talk) 09:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I just edited your article to change from the Hardvard citation style to the web wiki citation style. Western calligraphy That was in fact easy, since you made a really methodic work of citation (thanks !). I think your article may now candidate to get the 'Good article' or even the 'Quality article' statue. I will propose its candidacy.
- Regards and thanks,
- Yug (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Alison3.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Alison3.jpg, which you've attributed to Lauretta Goode. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
