User talk:Fugu Alienking
Welcome to my talk page!
- Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
- If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
- Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|Fugu Alienking}}.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
- Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
- Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
|
August 2017
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Carl Freer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Pichku (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Technically, it was not yet edit warring, and I had already stopped reverting and sought assistance. But nice to see that you got your last revert in before accusing me, I hope it made you feel good. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 15:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Technicalities and WP:Wikilawyering is not allowed on wikipedia and I feel appalled at your way of putting this. Now you have reverted again partially. A revert means changing content of another user in whole or in part. I suggest you revert yourself to clear your self from this violation. --Pichku (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- By your definition, every edit on Wikipedia is a revert. I reiterate my previous suggestion for you to carefully study WP:OWN and consider your own actions toward the Carl Freer article. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 12:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Technicalities and WP:Wikilawyering is not allowed on wikipedia and I feel appalled at your way of putting this. Now you have reverted again partially. A revert means changing content of another user in whole or in part. I suggest you revert yourself to clear your self from this violation. --Pichku (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Technically, it was not yet edit warring, and I had already stopped reverting and sought assistance. But nice to see that you got your last revert in before accusing me, I hope it made you feel good. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 15:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)