Jump to content

User talk:Fryeng1990

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to 2026 Rugby League World Cup, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 10:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Once, looked like an editing test. Twice, starts to look deliberate. If you've got information that some of the World Cup is going to be played in Indonesia, then please share the source with the rest of us. Nthep (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2027 World Games (December 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Fryeng1990! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 07:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Horace Wells. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 09:03, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragon Team XI (December 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Royiswariii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Royiswariii Talk! 00:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nthep (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed your edits and I haven't found a single one that is a positive contribution to Wikipedia. You are either wasting people's time by submitting blank submissions for review, or adding content without sources that is subsequently shown to be false. You've received several warning but don't seem to have heeded any of them. You're free to request an unblock, if you can convince another admin that you're competent to edit then fine, I'm not going to object.