User talk:Fossasus

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stormbreaker (novel), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. hbdragon88 (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stormbreaker (novel), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stormbreaker (novel) was changed by Fossasus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865571 on 2011-01-13T19:21:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stormbreaker (novel), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stormbreaker (novel) was changed by Fossasus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874071 on 2011-01-18T14:29:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Stormbreaker (novel), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. hbdragon88 (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to one week because you have attempted to evade the block by using another account. Please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry if you wish to read Wikipedia's policy on abuse of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but you should be aware that any further abuse is likely to lead to an indefinite block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]