Jump to content

User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28→Archive 30

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Pratt (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheOneWorkingAccount was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Estrin (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I see absolutely no significant changes since the AFD. It's now been resubmitted 4 times with no sources that establish notability - the current sources aside from a small few existed when it was AFD'd previously.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 14:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on this page. I hope you'll join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#16:48:14,_24_February_2020_review_of_draft_by_DougHill. DougHill (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Col. John Waterman

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Col. John Waterman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

I believe his family is notable for the town in Rhode Island and their long history. Not sure how to handle it really. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Keys Winchell has been accepted

John Keys Winchell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyrus J. Williams has been accepted

Cyrus J. Williams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alyssa Farah has been accepted

Alyssa Farah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tagishsimon (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Violet Horner has been accepted

Violet Horner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigolettes of Paris (February 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WikiAviator was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Giving the number of sources and the significance of mentions in the sources, this article does not meet the creation guidelines for articles given its low level of notability.
WikiAviator (talk) 04:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Heart of Texas (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No claims made to why this would pass WP:GNG or WP:FILM, nor do the references automatically infer one of the two. Just because a film is old, doesn't mean it was or will ever be notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
User:Sulfurboy, one of the film notability criteria is "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career." In this case that is met for Texas Guinan and Tom London. Also a significant part of the Frohman film series. Because it's significant to several players we can't properly merge it to just one. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, Where is any source stating that movie was a major part of any of those people's career? Sulfurboy (talk) 04:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wycliffe A. Hill

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wycliffe A. Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Preacher and the Bear

2 DIFFERENT things by two different editors. The item you re-posted is original research, which is the argument made against the item I had posted. Please discuss on the article talk page. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your inaccurate addition was sourced to Genius.com. You've been reverted on your retaliatory content removal of something properly sourced. Feel.free to take your arguments to talk. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
The other editor had not claimed my source was invalid, only that my conclusions constituted original research. The conclusions about the other item were, likewise, original research. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
User:RoySmith removed your edit as "Remove unsourced WP:OR", twice. You then retaliated by removing a properly cited bit claiming "same reason my addition was removed". You've been reverted and the problem pointed out to you by two experienced editors. Leave off or take it to talk. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Show me where, in the source for the item you restored,[1] where it says anything about "bigoted slurs." ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
"First Line
A nigger preacher went out hunting was on one Sunday morn." If you wish to discuss the content further please take your concerns to the article talk page so everyone can participate. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
The source merely presents the original lyrics. It makes no value judgment about them. Calling them "bigoted slurs", which I would agree with, nevertheless constitutes original research. Do you intend to actually discuss this on the article talk page? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
The changes you've made to the article, and without discussion on the talk page, have rendered the article even more biased than it was. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 13:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank La Roche (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DocumentError was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DocumentError (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
How are this and this, among the cited sources, not substantial in coverage? Ridiculous. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
This is an argument for simply being bold and creating an article yourself, rather than "asking permission". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NMI Museum of History and Culture has been accepted

NMI Museum of History and Culture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sea of Shadows has been accepted

Sea of Shadows, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otis M. Moore (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What notability standard do you suppose this person passes? Fails WP:NPOL as he only held city wide office in a small city. Not enough coverage at least from what I see to warrant a pass of WP:GNG. Even if this maybe passes WP:GNG we still have the issue of you incorrectly referencing Gbooks.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gigolettes of Paris (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I disagree with it being outright rejected as it was before this, but again Gbooks issues. You really need to have stuff like that airtight for articles such as this where the notability is very, very slim. Can you maybe find print reviews of the movie? That more than anything will help any film pass WP:NFILM
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Salleh (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanji rumbi (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Mostly unsourced
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christiansburg Institute has been accepted

Christiansburg Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: B. H. Campbell House has been accepted

B. H. Campbell House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carey House (Wichita, Kansas) has been accepted

Carey House (Wichita, Kansas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Davis (reformer) has been accepted

Jackson Davis (reformer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphonse Martell (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No indication of how this person has made "unique or prolific" contributions. Just because the person had a bunch of bit parts in movies doesn't mean that made a prolific contribution. Surely you know this by now.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Thirty year film career and many dozens of credited film roles? Definitely prolific. Also directed a film. Resubmitting. Take it to AfD if you object. Clearly meets the notability criteria. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphonse Martell (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No in-depth coverage nothing to indicate they pass WP:GNG
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip Nobel has been accepted

Philip Nobel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Sferrazza Anthony has been accepted

Carl Sferrazza Anthony, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plainfield Academy (Connecticut) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sub-Tropical Exposition (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Coverage is wholly WP:LOCAL
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plainfield Academy (Connecticut) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Format the Gbooks sources correctly then tag me and I'll approve this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Refill not wormong for ke atthe moment. But feel free to formet the refs yourself. Wikipedia is collaborative. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plainfield Academy (Connecticut) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
No. It was clearly stated what needed to be done. Refill is not going to properly format those references, so I'm not sure what it being down has to do with anything. We're not here to help clean up the corners you choose to constantly cut. WP:BUILDER
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry L. Newhouse has been accepted

Henry L. Newhouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John P. Cushman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plainfield Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plainfield Academy (Connecticut) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Trichostema setaceum

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trichostema setaceum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claude Woodruff (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myron Blank (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC

Any reason you're still creating articles through AfC instead of doing them directly? You've been around well and truly long enough to not be forced to use the process, and it seems like something that would make people unnecessarily miserable to subject all your efforts to languishing in the AfC queue for weeks or months. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

User:The Drover's Wife I received an editing restriction for creating too many articles and saving too many at AfD. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Goertzel has been accepted

Victor Goertzel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 01:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myron Blank has been accepted

Myron Blank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ira F. Lewis has been accepted

Ira F. Lewis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plainfield Academy (Connecticut) has been accepted

Plainfield Academy (Connecticut), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Redding & Son has been accepted

William Redding & Son, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odell Pollard (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Put simply, not notable. Head of a state party doesn't count.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 09:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Caldwell Dobie has been accepted

Charles Caldwell Dobie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphonse Martell has been accepted

Alphonse Martell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neighbor (company) has been accepted

Neighbor (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sterling Pictures concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sterling Pictures, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichostema setaceum has been accepted

Trichostema setaceum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion for discussing declines

I've noticed that you sometimes will respond on your talk page to decline with the reasons that you disagree with the decline. You'd probably be better off posting those arguments on the applicable draft page, as some reviewers might not monitor all the updates on your talk page (especially since there's constant updates from draft accepts/declines). Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Estrin has been accepted

Allen Estrin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

WikiAviator (talk) 11:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for bothering you, but...

New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
  • New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
  • If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 20:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
I will take a look. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Percy Challenger (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No reason given why this person is notable. And you also are again incorrectly formatted your gbooks links even after being asked multiple times to do it correctly.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sub-Tropical Exposition (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fix the gbooks link, ping me afterwards and I'll approve this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
The citation tools unfortunately haven't been working for me. Did you try? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, Reflinks wouldn't fix the issue anyways. Either way a tool not working is not an excuse when it can be done manually. Please review WP:CS a link to a google books search result is not a valid source. I will continue to reject any of your articles that don't have it fixed. You've been warned against it a myriad of times. You know better by now and I've seen you fix it before so I know you can do it. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
As I said before, the tool is not working for me. Why are you so lazy and uncollegial that you refuse to help? Don't be a jerk. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solidago stricta has been accepted

Solidago stricta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel J. Sanders has been accepted

Daniel J. Sanders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brainerd Institute has been accepted

Brainerd Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Hart Harrigan has been accepted

Anthony Hart Harrigan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Percy Challenger (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The key is significant roles in many films. We have no way to verify the extent of his role in these films and some films we can't even verify he was in it at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sub-Tropical Exposition has been accepted

Sub-Tropical Exposition, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dale Crider has been accepted

Dale Crider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vernon Redding has been accepted

Vernon Redding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oscar Hiram Lipps has been accepted

Oscar Hiram Lipps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Vaudeville Museum (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Colorado Photographic Arts Center

Congratulations, Colorado Photographic Arts Center is now an article.

It's a bit thin, though. I suggest that you try to flesh it out a little. -- Hoary (talk) 09:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moncrief Park

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moncrief Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Deep City Records

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deep City Records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Washington and New Orleans Telegraph Company has been accepted

Washington and New Orleans Telegraph Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greater Frenchtown (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Frenchtown (Tallahassee) instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eyesnore 21:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Partners of the Tide has been accepted

Partners of the Tide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bkassine concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bkassine, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Pratt has been accepted

Jack Pratt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_26&oldid=949211488"