User talk:Flora Malherbe

Welcome!

Hello, Flora Malherbe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 19:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)`[reply]

Alberta Nelson links

These links have been placed on the page of every movie Alberta Nelson appeared in. They should only appear on her own page. It would be too unwieldy to include the home page of every star in every movie they were ever in. - AKeen 17:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wdarden_sm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wdarden_sm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WADarden Tiger1958.JPG

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: William A. Darden

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that William A. Darden meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Darden. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. SoLando (Talk) 05:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William A. Darden

Interesting but there is no compelling assertion of notability apparent in the article (fails WP:MILMOS#NOTE), limited independent coverage of subject. Appointments, rank and medals received don't appear to merit an entry, which is unfortunate as Wikipedia has been inclusive to a fair bit of cruftiness of late ;-). Is the Bronze Star and Legion of Merit particularly significant awards in the US order of precedence? Are they comparable to, for example, the British Military Medal (awarded to over 130,000 people! At least according to the article)? SoLando (Talk) 05:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —SoLando (Talk) 05:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No more notable than the hundreds of thousands of other soldiers with similar decorations. And the account that created the article is virtually an SPA: [1] Qworty (talk) 09:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While these are honorable decorations demonstrating courageous military service, they are not the highest decorations offered in the US military and do not automatically confer notability. Nor do any of his other, rather perfunctory, staff assignments. --Dhartung | Talk 20:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While there does appear to be some original research here, along with some unnecessary cruft, the sources listed, while not incorporated as proper references, seem to be, at least on the surface, reasonable enough secondary sources to nominally satisfy WP:RS. While the Christian Activities article was written by a family member, it was nonetheless published through a standard editorial process of a print magazine. (The magazine, BTW, cites a circulation of 15,000 to 20,000 a month in the Nashville area.) The other sources seem to be of varying levels of coverage, though it is hard to determine without actually seeing them. As to the notability of the subject's awards, while each by itself likely doesn't confer notability, nor might not be just a couple of them, the combination of all of them may amount to a reasonable degree of notability. Thus, I recommend that this article be cleaned up, crufty information culled, and referencing improved. LaMenta3 (talk) 07:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete LaMenta makes a good but not convincing argument. Colonel isn't quite high enough to be inherently notable. He doesn't appear to meet WP:MILMOS#NOTE. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christian Activities.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christian Activities.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tilky Jones, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and Take 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WADarden Tiger1958.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WADarden Tiger1958.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]