User talk:FlightTime/Archive 41

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current page.

← Archive 40

Archive 41

Archive 42 →

A message from Nylix4488

I would like my edit to the Rudolph The Red-Nosed Reindeer TV special page to be restored. I was adding additional information to the section about the 2005 CBS version of the special. I apologize for not adding an edit summary. Nylix4488 (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of my edit to Geoff Capes (addition of the Recent Death header)

Hi! I just wanted to let you know why I added the recent death header to the article about Geoff Capes, given his passing. I noticed you'd reverted my change, based on the stabilisation of activity. I counted 24 edits in about 38 minutes, so basically getting edited more than once every 2 minutes, which I considered meant that things would be changing rapidly. I appreciate your removal was due to that activity stabilising, I'm just a little concerned that it's going to keep being repeatedly edited as more and more info comes out. Thanks for your work though, it's appreciated! Dane|Geld 17:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DaneGeld: Yeah, at this point it more of an advertisement, many edits yesterday and more today, the death information is already set it just copy editing now and the {{recent death}} template is not used to advertise or confirm the death. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

zucchini

@FlightTime: Excuse me. I've made an edit in the page "zucchini" and you've reverted it twice. I think there's a misunderstanding, it isn't a disruptive edit but a constructive edit. Could you tell me what you think is wrong with it, please? I'll explain everything you need to know, and in case a part of my edit is really wrong I won't continue restoring it. Let me know, thanks! 151.20.19.163 (talk) 22:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC) EDIT Sorry, now I've seen what was wrong with it, your partial revert is okay for me :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.19.163 (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Please review WP:OVERLINKING. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Arnold Schwarzenegger

@FlightTime: Hello, you reverted an edit of mine @ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&oldid=prev&diff=1252573621

Would you please explain how this item: "Schwarzenegger saved a drowning man in 2004 while on vacation in Hawaii by swimming out and bringing him back to shore." belongs in this section: "Accidents and injuries". All the other examples relate directly to an accident or injury of Schwarzenegger himself.

My edit comment was "interesting fact, but clearly not an accident or an injury." Your revert comment was "Removal of sourced content without discussion" which did not relate at all to my edit comment. I am sure that either of us can come up with an enormous list of material that, even though properly sourced, does not belong in articles, etc.

If it said in Accidents and injuries that Schwarzenegger drives a Honda Civic, and that was properly sourced, you would object to it being removed? It definitely did not belong in that section, so I removed it. Would you please consider removing it again? Or I will be happy to discuss further.

Thank you • Bobsd • (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobsd: My edit summary says exactly why I reverted your edit. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: How about taking the time to reply to my questions? Are you saying that "saving a drowning man" properly belongs in a section about "Accidents and injuries" to Schwarzenegger? That any properly sourced sentence, about anything, could be placed in that section and an editor should not remove it because it is sourced, without a discussion on the talk page? • Bobsd • (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Monkees

Why did you revert the change on the Monkees page that gave the correct album title? If you don't have a compelling reason, your reversion needs to be undone. Sm5574 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Doomed Shadow

This discussion/section is closed. I've explained three times why I reverted you changes, no time to keep repeating myself. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 02:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Hello, hope you're doing good, I am here to speak about an edit I did on Miss May I that you have reverted. You reverted my edits due to 'unreliable sources', however you removed the edits which had the unknown section in the director column in their music video list, the link I put on Motionless in White's album Graveyard Shift and a spelling error on the band's page.

All I'm saying is that those edits were not supposed to be removed, and they are certainly not 'unreliable sources'. Thanks Doomed Shadow (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say "unreliable sources" I said "unsourced OR" - FlightTime (open channel) 01:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, understood. The edits you reverted (except from Ryan Neff rejoining the band) had nothing to do with unsourcing and they were fine as they were and should've not been removed . Doomed Shadow (talk) 01:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No they were not. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to understand why these edits were reverted. I think you made a mistake. Doomed Shadow (talk) 01:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from SummeRStorM79

Hello. I was just wondering what your issue was with the edit I made on the Geordi La Forge page? The VISOR acronym description I added is an acceptable alternate (at least in the Star Trek fan universe realm). I was just trying to add some info. May I add it back in? If not, I will leave it how it is. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 01:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SummeRStorM79: It needs to be sourced. - FlightTime (open channel) 05:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from BakedintheHole

Hello! You removed my revision to The Wizard of Oz and were kind enough to leave a message on my page, but I am unsure how to properly cite the sources per your notice. Would you please help me fix the error? --BakedintheHole (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BakedintheHole: See Help:Referencing for beginners. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Not forum

forum: a place, meeting, or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged.
User talk page: User pages are for communication and collaboration...Its normal use is for messages from, and discussion with, other editors...legitimate uses of user space include...limited autobiographical content

Any questions? Viriditas (talk) 20:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: Sorry, it was a misclick, I reverted it immediately. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File names

@FlightTime: Why did you rename File:Wongyeong poster.png to File:The Queen Who Crowns poster.png, when the requested name was clearly File:The Queen Who Crowns poster.png? Same goes with File:Hide - TV series (title card).jpg, where I requested it to be File:Hide (TV series) poster.jpg. Both files are indeed poster and not a title card. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Windborne Rider: Because that's the standard way with that type of file, FYI you don't need to ping a user when posting on their talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Reportersteven

You reverted a change I made to the Harvey Danger page saying you don’t think photos should be added. I disagree with your decision and have started a discussion on the talk section of that page. I welcome your discussion. Reportersteven (talk) 07:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reportersteven: Well, first off I didn't say photo's shouldn't be added, it's where and how you put it was the reason for the revert.

===''Little by Little...'' and breakup [[File:Harvey Danger Hoquiam.jpg|thumb| Harvey Danger in 2008.]] (2005–2009)===

This not how we do images here. Images 'do not go inside section headers and adding unnecessary blank lines. You can see what I mean here. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn’t you just fix it to be the way you wanted it to be instead of reverting it? Reportersteven (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also reverted both of my photos, one was inside the section header and the other was not. I’m putting that one back now at least. It feels you were overzealous in your decision. Reportersteven (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I put a photo back in the history area. I made sure there were no extra lines. This is similar to where other bands have put photos in the history section. See Pearl Jam. see Nirvana. I no longer wish to continue this discussion on your page. If you have any further comments, let’s do it on the Harvey Danger Talk page and others can weigh in on your thoughts. Reportersteven (talk) 02:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding My Edits on Jack White

Hello, sorry to bother. Just was curious why one of my edits was reverted. I am a bit confused as I linked the Spin Magazine edition so the reader can access the source. Happy to discuss this. Cahlin29 (talk) 22:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cahlin29: A diff would help. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff? Cahlin29 (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff. The reason of my revert is completely explained in the notice I left on your talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Level four user warnings

Somebody switching out an image on an article[1] does not appear worthy of a level 4 user warning like the one you gave here[2]. From what I can see, it's their only edit to the article, they never edited the talkpage, and while I know it might be frustrating to have a bunch of people change something that has already been hashed on on the talkpage, people tend to do those things in good faith and should be treated better than a run of the mill vandal. Is there any context I've missed, or did you press the wrong button? Thanks, GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Also- and I fuly admit to being a cat person not a dog person, sorry, but Buddy and Daisy are pretty darn cute!) GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

And a Happy New Year!

May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Thedarkknightli (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.

Thedarkknightli (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thedarkknightli: Thank you, you also :) - FlightTime (open channel) 22:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partial rangeblocks

Hi FlightTime; regarding this request; that's a *very* large range, and that range has only edited the Elton John talk page once. A partial block can accomodate up to 10 targets; if we added targets to the list based on a single bad edit, we'd run out of targets really quickly. It's best to only add targets when someone from that range is repeatedly disrupting it. For more isolated cases like this, we can start with a full block on the /64 if they continue. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: No worries, guess that's one reason I'm not an Admin :P, You know best, Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]