User talk:False Prophet/Archives/2006/September
This is an archive of past discussions with User:False Prophet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hezbollah mediation
School absolutely comes before Wikipedia. However, I think that things are actually getting worse rather than better and JiHy is veering into a lot of personal attacks. Elizmr 15:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Response to the message on my talk page left on Mediation page. JiHymas@himivest.com 03:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your fine efforts in bringing this mediation to a successful conclusion JiHymas@himivest.com 18:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks False Prophet! Elizmr 23:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Mediation case on JumpTV
I noticed that you have closed the case. Actually, the issue has long been settled out of band. You might have noted that there were no message exchanges after the first day. That's because later, JumpTV's director of marketing sent email messages to me and Jimbo saying that his employee will not edit the articles further, and the edits in question will stop thereafter. If you want, I can forward you the emails. So, your recommendation of RFArb based on the assumption that the case was unresolved, should be changed. Thank you. --Ragib 17:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter Issue IV - September 2006 | |
|
Welcome to the fourth issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. We would encourage all members to get more envolved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor |
| |
| |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 12:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Question on my RFA
Greetings, False Prophet! I have answered your very good question on my RFA; hopefully it'll be good enough for your standards. —this is messedrocker
(talk)
05:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed you put a support vote in the oppose section. Did you mean to put it in the support section, or was it an oppose vote, or what? Just letting you know. —
this is messedrocker
(talk)
17:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
Thank you, False Prophet, for liking how I answered your questions and then voted "support" on my RFA. It's good to see that even though I may have banned someone back at Wikinews, I can still be trusted. I hope I can trustworthy on Wikipedia too! —this is messedrocker
(talk)
21:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Mediate us?
Hi False Prophet,
I saw you successfully mediated the Hezbollah page conflict; I haven't been able to get a mediator yet for a dispute I'm in over on the Hong Tran page. Would you mind stepping in? The mediation page is: [1]
Thanks, Emcee 23:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi False Prophet,
Although Nottingham is refraining from editing the Hong Tran page while it is in AfD, his recent edits to the Washington United States Senate election, 2006 page make it seem like this conflict could bleed into other pages, and is likely to start back up on the Tran page after the AfD is closed. Given what I've seen thus far, I'm not optimistic that mediation will lead to a collaborative attitude from Nottingham, but I'm willing to give it a try (and I think I need to before an RfA). Could you begin talking with us on this? Btw, Bobblehead and I have differences of opinion on these articles as well, and in my opinion he was a participant in (and perhaps even the one who started) the edit war on the Hong Tran page, but it looks more to me like he and I will be able to work in a civil and sane manner on continuing disagreements. I will leave it up to you as to whether you want to include him in the mediation discussions.
Thanks, Emcee 19:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Please help
Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Copy of deleted article
Since you indicated you would be interested in seeing what the deleted article looked like I have put a copy of it in User:JoshuaZ/Sandbox. I would however make the preliminary statement that DRV is not AfD take 2 but is supposed to be about whether the process was followed (although this DRV is getting to be such a mess I doubt anyone will mind yet another user [[WP:IAR|deciding that it is better to ignore that). JoshuaZ 03:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue VII - September 2006 | |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 20:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I note that you have indicated that the project listed above is "abandoned." I wonder if by that you mean the project should be considered discontinued, and possibly whether the page should be deleted. I ask because I am in the process of compiling a master list of all the projects, active and inactive, out there, and I would like to know whether you think the project page should continue to exist and thus be listed or not. I will list it until and unless you indicate that you believe it should not be. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 00:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)