User talk:Fallout boy

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fallout boy has not edited Wikipedia since November 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

OK

Shinemygrillz 01:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know just don't edit the Lil' Kim article and we won't have a problem. i unblocked you. So.......

you keep changing that age of Kim. That is the wrong thing because it states that she is in a New York jail and we all no that she's not. Thats why I told you to stop editing it so we won't have this problem. Shinemygrillz 02:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know what dude let's just get along I mean, it doesn't matter to me what year you put. Lets be cool, are We cool? Shinemygrillz 02:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Because i Just Don't Wanna Start a Fight. Shinemygrillz 02:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salma Hayek

Hello, the picture of Salma Hayek was taken at the Cannes Film Festival by my husband Philippe Baledent. Please let me know what should I do so that the picture is not removed. Thanks, Biosstars

Please leave me a message...I'm ever so lonely.

Al Lewis

Since it has been proven that he was born in 1923, do you think it is safe to remove the "disputed" marker from his page? Vandelac25 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Nice icons

I wanted to compliment you on the little fair use icons. I think they are wonderful and are very clever! Thanks! --Fastfission 02:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

flag copyright icon

If you are interested, I made a 3D renderization of the previous one which you can use: Image:Flag-iconcopyright3.png--Fallout boy 07:45, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the black/white one you've added to the template is for the best. ¦ Reisio 08:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Roxann Dawson

California Birth Index Name: Roxann Caballero Birth Date: 11 Sep 1958 Gender: Female Mother's Maiden Name: Flores Birth County: Los Angeles Questors 16:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Database is at ancestry.com, a subscription site. Questors 06:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Billie Joe Armstrong

I was the editor who mistakenly mixed up Oakland and Rodeo as their birthplaces and homes (after somebody put both as Oakland). I tried to interpret your talk page reply as best I could, but I obviously didn't interpret it well enough. Sorry again! Kareeser|Talk! 01:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jiminy Jillickers

To be honest, I saw one of their music videos and I think they're really crappy. Now, there's no need for profanity. --Mr. Billion 21:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

It's a much better way of doing it, no? Good luck on the FA status.Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Heder and Steve Burns

Are the premature death reports of Steve Burns and Jon Heder notable enough to list here?--Fallout boy 04:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, because they appear to be mere rumors (i.e. not reported as fact by the media), which aren't allowed on the premature obituaries list. Ben Finn 21:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate format

Thanks for letting me know! It's unfortunately how I learn the most. SidP

Susan Lucci

Susan Lucci appeared on the Jane Pauley show in 2005, and for the first time she publicly revealed her age, stating that she would be turning fifty-nine years old on her next birthday (which was in December of 2005). Susan has also stated for years that she was twenty-three years old when she landed the role of Erica Kane on AMC, which is how many people originally calculated her age (1970-23), forgetting that Lucci turned 23 in December, and AMC aired only days after her birthday. There was no way she could have landed a role after December 23, 1969, for a show that premiered on January 5, 1970.

Re: Diane Keaton

It looks really good, well done! Just a few issues that shouldn't be too hard to fix. Often there is a quote from a critic but there is no mention of which critic or publication it is from. On a related note, I noticed that the word "described" was used several times (though believe me, I know how hard it is to try and write things like that without ending up repeating myself). Also, I think that the poor reception of the film Town & Country deserves a mention as it is one of the biggest commercial failures of all time, which is one of the reasons why Something's Gotta Give was heralded as such a big comeback for her. Anyway, nice work! I suggest taking it to peer review, and then WP:FAC. Extraordinary Machine 22:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hello- regarding your edit to the Angelina Jolie article, I'm not sure your edit was minor enough to be considered minor under the guidelines suggested by the Wikipedia minor edit policy.

"The rule of thumb is that an edit which is confined to spelling corrections, minor formatting, and minor rearrangement of text should be flagged as a "minor edit." A major edit is basically anything that will make the modified article worth looking at again, by anyone who wants to watch the article closely for anything which could change its meaning. Any "real" change, even if it is a single word, is a major edit."

It's a good edit, though. Keep up the good work. - Eric 02:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bush Razzie

See Talk:George W. Bush#Worst Actor Razzie. I'm not trying to stir up an edit war but it seems non-notable in the context of this article. It also seems a bit POV to include it. Cheers. --Scaife (Talk) Don't forget Hanlon's Razor 03:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Doherty Picture

You recently removed a picture from the Pete Doherty article. I realised that the CC license it was under is not normally permitted on wikipedia, however the photographer himself allows all his photos to be used on wikipedia as I stated on the image's info page. Please see: http://www.andrewkendall.com/pages/misc/pictureusage.php If I tagged the image incorrectly I apologise. Would there be a better tag to use? Super Ted 15:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for prompt reply. Cheers for emailing him, I'm fairly new here so very confused by all the licensing issues! Someone has added an image to various former Libs including Pete Doherty, Carl Barat and Gary Powell and also Dirty Pretty Things (band). I'm not convinced these images are licensed either. What do you think? Also, where would be a good place to look for free alternatives? I'm having quite a lot of trouble! Super Ted 10:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate, all help is appreciated. Would you mind letting me know what Andrew Kendall says about his photos because he has a lot of high quality photos for lots of other bands (he's an NME photographer), and I'd rather make sure images were OK to use before adding them to articles. Also, could we not lower the resolution of the images and categorise as Template:Magazinecover?Super Ted 11:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know about the Pete Doherty picture. It was my first picture upload. I'll fix it.OneVeryBadMan 23:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

50 cent image

I received permission by email to consider it part of the creative commons. Could you remove the tag now? Thanks, --Urthogie 10:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email now on the image page. Thanks, --Urthogie 11:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homer Simpson wins!

| Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.This week Homer Simpson was selected to be improved to featured article status.Hope you can help…

Joyous | Talk 18:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Mariah Carey/archive2

Sorry for the late reply. I've inserted Image:Mariah Carey in January 2000.jpg at the top of the article, I hope that looks okay. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 23:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ina Garten article

Hey, thanks for changing the cite format over! I finally know how to use a cite more than once and not have to constantly shift them around. Appreciate it. :) Air.dance 02:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Viggo.jpg

Thanks for letting me know! I was quite new to WIKIPEDIA when I uploaded this picture! I have now sourced it properly! Thank you again! Madangry 17:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get your name from the simpsons

You name is the same name as a character in the simpsons did you get it from there, it is a great name by the way (Deng 11:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

This is the simpsons user box it aint all that good but it is better then nothing ;) (Deng 11:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

d'oh!

This user thinks The Simpsons is simply... excellent.

Image:Ashley_Tisdale_Promo.jpg

Hi, you removed the

This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.

The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide evidence of such ownership. Lack of such evidence is grounds for deletion.

It is believed that the use of some images of promotional material to illustrate:

the person(s), product, event, or subject in question;
where the image is unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it;
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation;

qualifies as fair use under Copyright law of the United States. Any other usage of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Publicity photos.

Additionally, the copyright holder may have granted permission for use in works such as Wikipedia. However, if they have, this permission likely does not fall under a free license.

Warning sign

Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. If this is not the case for this image, a rationale must be provided proving that the image provides information beyond simple identification or showing that this image is difficult to replace by a free-licensed equivalent. Commercial third-party reusers of this image should consider whether their use is in violation of the subject's publicity rights.

Fair use true

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
This tag should only be used for images of a person, product, or event that is known to have come from a press kit or similar source, for the purpose of reuse by the media.
Additionally, if the copyright holder has granted permission, please provide further details as to the terms.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

tag from Image:Ashley_Tisdale_Promo.jpg, and replaced it with a tag for no license. The promophoto tag is there for an explination of fair use, which it does qualify for under US Copyright laws. If you feel that it doesn't, could you please let me know why on my talk page. If I don't here from you in a few days, I'm going to revert back to the

This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.

The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide evidence of such ownership. Lack of such evidence is grounds for deletion.

It is believed that the use of some images of promotional material to illustrate:

the person(s), product, event, or subject in question;
where the image is unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it;
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation;

qualifies as fair use under Copyright law of the United States. Any other usage of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Publicity photos.

Additionally, the copyright holder may have granted permission for use in works such as Wikipedia. However, if they have, this permission likely does not fall under a free license.

Warning sign

Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. If this is not the case for this image, a rationale must be provided proving that the image provides information beyond simple identification or showing that this image is difficult to replace by a free-licensed equivalent. Commercial third-party reusers of this image should consider whether their use is in violation of the subject's publicity rights.

Fair use true

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
This tag should only be used for images of a person, product, or event that is known to have come from a press kit or similar source, for the purpose of reuse by the media.
Additionally, if the copyright holder has granted permission, please provide further details as to the terms.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

tag. Thanks. --light darkness (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, I'll have the image deleted and will look for a new one that does meet Fair Use criteria. --light darkness (talk) 00:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your username

Thank god you don't like Fallout Boy. I was about to track you down, and ,um, nvm. --Osbus 01:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

social nudity article naming convention debates - get involved!

Hi, I'd like to invite you to get involved in establishing consensus in discussions concerning naming conventions for social nudity topics.

Please join in this community discussion regarding the name of Portal:Clothes free.

Participate here: Portal_talk:Clothes_free#Votes

Please also join in the discussion about what to name an article dealing with social nudity. I believe the the latter term is a better term to use than naturism or nudism as it is more WP:NPOV and is in use currently. Formerly the article was titled Clothes free movement.

Participate here: Talk:Naturism#Move_to_Social_nudity Cheers, User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 20:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Office (US TV series) FA

Hey there. You're currently offering conditional support for The Office's FA nomination. About half of the trivia was removed after you raised your point. Just leaving a note in case you felt compelled to offer your full support. ;-) Mrtea (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Lohan

Hey, just to let you know, I used to correct redirects, too, until someone pointed me to this. Makes life easier, I guess... ;) Radio Kirk talk to me 12:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ref converter RFC

Hello there, I'd just like to make you aware that Lulu has filed an RfC against me and "other users of Ref converter". Since you are explicitly named in the RFC I think it is safe to assume that you are one of the people named in the "other users of Ref converter" bit, so you may want to get involved. Just a heads-up, Cyde Weys 18:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Hi. I just wanna ask you in favor if you can help me make the image copyrighted. (CENA LUV 00:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)) If you want a good picture of a mushroom cloud (which fits your username) look up Tsar Bomba. Also, thank you for hating the band which shares your name. My G/F makes me listen to them constantly, when i'd much rather hear a rabid possum being beaten by a large Russian man weilding a white hot samurai sword. Paco 03:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Bilson

Do you use Ancestry.com birth certificates, too? If so, can you find Nikki Reed's certificate? I've looked but couldn't turn up anything. She may have been born under a slightly different name, or maybe she wasn't born in California. Mad Jack O'Lantern 19:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC) :Weird. So at least one piece of the puzzle - name / place / date - has to be off. Mad Jack O'Lantern 19:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daryl Hannah

That is one unfortunate picture you added.... :) Poor Elle Driver Mad Jack O'Lantern 07:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tila Tequila fair use image.

I did that back in November, when I didn't know you could ask permission to release a pic into the Creative Commons or GDFL. At them moment, I'm not feeling the fair-use image. I'm planning on asking Tila to release this pic to the Creative Commons. The pose is what this encylopedia needs, with but the gamma need to be toned down a bit. --LBMixPro Lbmixpro 05:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tila Tequila.jpg - It's on the commons now! --LBMixPro Lbmixpro 05:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kuehlsheila.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuehlsheila.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: *Wikipedia:Image use policy *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chuck Palahniuk Roses and Shit Tour 2006.jpg

Personally, I don't see why I should let Wikipedia own anything. So what exactly is a free license? -NeoThe1 10:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Thirdman1-9950.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thirdman1-9950.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: *Wikipedia:Image use policy *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two Image Licensing Tags

Hi, I was wondering if you clear up for me what the difference is between {{GFDL-self}} and {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat}} and when I should use them. NeoThe1 20:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC) :I'm still not quite clear on this; can you please tell me when {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat}} should not be used?NeoThe1 22:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC) ::Uh, one more stupid question: if it doesn't matter which tag I use, why are there two tags? What do they *specifically* indicate with regard to copyright ownership and rights release?NeoThe1 02:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick

Do you have a source for his year of birth? I just haven't seen it definitely mentioned Mad Jack 02:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC) :Hmm... well I saw the article (I was the one who added it as a reference) but still... He could have skipped a grade/started early or something along those lines... I'm not sure if we should just assume a date based on other details, it's very original research-y. Mad Jack 02:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC) ::Well, he could have been born in 1998. Maybe we should put in something like "born 1998 or 1999"? Mad Jack 02:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Help save this article from deletion that you contributed to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity

Image:VishniacBerlin.jpg

Question: What makes you so sure that Image:VishniacBerlin.jpg was published before 1922? It was taken in 1922, but I don't think it must be in the public domain... -- Rmrfstar 10:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) :That date is the date the image was taken; I don't know it was published that year. I think we should change it back to "fair use" to be safe. -- Rmrfstar 07:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Image:Tom Anderson.jpg

It has been so long ago since I got permission from Tom. Keep in mind that myspace was not nearly as popular then as it is now, both good and bad. But he did respond to me in a private message early on. I will have to search through over 2000 messages to find it if that is what is needed. -- Riffsyphon1024 13:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avril

I sent this e-mail to the webmaster of Alavigne.com. If I get permission in a response to this e-mail will it be suitable for replacement? I really liked your webpage on Avril Lavigne. I found it very informative and useful. I'd love to use it in a project I'm involved with called Wikipedia, so I'm seeking your permission. Wikipedia http://www.wikipedia.org is a free encyclopedia that is collaboratively edited by volunteers from around the world. I'd like to include your materials in this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avril Lavinge. To get a sense of the freedom of Wikipedia, you could even edit this right now, even without formally registering. We can only use your materials if you are willing to grant permission for this under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. This means that anyone will have the right to share and, where appropriate, to update your material. You can read this license in full at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GFDL (NB To keep things simple, we don't use Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, or Back-Cover Texts) The license expressly protects authors "from being considered responsible for modifications made by others" while ensuring that authors get credit for their work. There is more information on our copyright policy at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights If you agree, we will credit you for your work in the resulting article's references section by stating that it was based on your work and is used with your permission, and by providing a web link back to ALavigne.com Thank you for your time; I look forward to your response. --CyberGhostface 18:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Kennedymtvcap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kennedymtvcap.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 13:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cherish Pic

Maybe Ur Good with Images Maybe Your Not. I want you to visit Cherish. I believe that someone uploaded it and someone delted it. Just asking for help :). --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 02:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keys' middle name

Hi Fallout Boy, I edited the page on Alicia Keys a couple days ago, where did you find her middle name is J? I can't find any reputable source for this. Hesperides 00:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC) :Hi again, I clicked on those links, and neither of them had any info on "J." being her middle name.Hesperides 19:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC) :: Hmm, does the subscription-required Ancestry.com page say J.? Because the Ancestry page you linked to doesn't have any J. in her name, and I don't see why the non-subscription and subscription pages would have conflicting birth names. Hesperides 20:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images that have violated copyright

Hi, since you're concerned with images that violate copyright, you might want to clean-up Conan O'Brien's article since there are "free" and publicity photos on that one article. Thanks. --SunKing 17:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dogville 098-27c.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dogville 098-27c.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --85.160.8.42 10:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

14 Year Old Girls

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article 14 Year Old Girls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:14 Year Old Girls. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Erechtheus 19:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Barzee.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barzee.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: *Wikipedia:Image use policy *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:434-gotti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:434-gotti.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: *Wikipedia:Image use policy *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jiminy Jillikers!

I like the username. Will (Take me down to the Paradise City) 23:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AndersonCooper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AndersonCooper.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 16:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AndersonCooper.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AndersonCooper.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 16:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Wsmithhitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wsmithhitch.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ResurgamII 02:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dkeatonsggshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dkeatonsggshot.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 02:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Efren Ramirez

I noticed you were the one who corrected his birth date to 1973. Someone has since changed it to 1983, citing MSNBC (who no doubt made the usual mistake) as a source. Would you mind going to the page and changing the date back to 1973? I'd do it myself, but I'm just not in a mood to engage in potential debate/discussion with the person who changed it to 1983. Thanks, and cheers, Mad Jack 05:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:UNDEFINED-0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UNDEFINED-0.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: *Wikipedia:Image use policy *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Janefonda.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Janefonda.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Arniep 22:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC) -- Arniep 22:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war? What edit war?

I'm curious about why you put the Anne Coulter age controversy on the "lamest edit wars" page, back in August of 2005[1]. Granted, the controversy about her age was a bit lame, and her lying about it was even lamer, but I couldn't find any trace of a Wikipedia edit-war about it. As far as I could see, her birth-year was righted without fuss in May '05[2], and that edit stood, unchallenged, until (by odd coincidence) just yesterday. Did I overlook something? I was hoping to see some dandy fireworks. (By the way, I set the date right again, and included the reference. I hope that doesn't begin and edit-war.) -- Lonewolf BC 07:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batman Begins

Some time ago, you voted against the nomination of Batman Begins as a Featured Article. The article has come a long way since, and I was wondering if you could take the time to share any suggestions you might have, either on my user talk page or the film article's own talk page. I do not believe that the article is yet ready for another FA nomination as I have improvements in mind. I hope that you will be able to share any insights you might have to help improve the article. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 01:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:GWHS LOGO.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 15:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Dd2 01.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dd2 01.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{Non-free fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 20:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dannii Minogue article

Hello. I enjoyed readings your FA articles on Uma Thurman and Diane Keaton and was wondering if you could look over the article on Australian singer-actress Dannii Minogue for me. I've had a few editors read it over once or twice before, but the more eyes the better. Thank you so much. -- Underneath-it-All 21:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jaymamaysredeye.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jaymamaysredeye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yokwsinglecover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yokwsinglecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DoTheRightThingRosie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DoTheRightThingRosie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Grahamg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grahamg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vaya 14:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MayaAngelou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MayaAngelou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: * Wikipedia:Image use policy * Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Movie_star_trek_valleris.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Movie_star_trek_valleris.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Zodiac3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zodiac3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 20:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Eochoa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eochoa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Graduatecap.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Graduatecap.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: * Wikipedia:Image use policy * Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uma Thurman FAR

Uma Thurman has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 19:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cleo6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cleo6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: * Wikipedia:Image use policy * Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ur name 'fallout boy'

Note: I am not a fan of the band Fall Out Boy. I had no idea there was a popular band of the same name when I picked my username. To be honest, I saw one of their music videos and I think they're really crappy, and I despise the fact my username associates them with me. To [mis]quote the film Office Space: "Why should I have to change my name? They're the ones who suck." R u outside of the UK/or US? U say u hadnt heard of fallout boy when u chose the name. Lilkunta 01:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jayma Mays

...jayma likes long division and multiplying fractions... Do u have any more info on her? I'm reading the same "fact" her & on imdb...but it reads 2 me like some 1 is joking. Lilkunta 01:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birthratechart.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Birthratechart.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Phearstmug1.jpg marked as replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Phearstmug1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1F11ConanOBrien.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1F11ConanOBrien.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 15:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:200px-Hirogen.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Hirogen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Comicgenlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Comicgenlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bonniehunt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bonniehunt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 20:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Phearstmug1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phearstmug1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:B0002XVKIG.03.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:B0002XVKIG.03.LZZZZZZZ.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ashesanddaimonds.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashesanddaimonds.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Debbieharry1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbieharry1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 06:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Condivshilary.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Condivshilary.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fetten jahre sind vorbei.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fetten jahre sind vorbei.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Georgepbush.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Georgepbush.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Natalisecover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Natalisecover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nakedcoverc11418.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nakedcoverc11418.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Meandyouposter.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Meandyouposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hatmalibustacy.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hatmalibustacy.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Talentofus One sheet.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Talentofus One sheet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Romy and michele s high school reunion.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Romy and michele s high school reunion.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sjsulogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sjsulogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:SIMPSONS SEASON6 DISC3-3.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SIMPSONS SEASON6 DISC3-3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:B000002I7896876.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:B000002I7896876.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:9482f.jpg

I have tagged Image:9482f.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:ARobinsonlarrycotton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ARobinsonlarrycotton.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wherethebuffaloroam.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wherethebuffaloroam.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:As03-martha updat.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:As03-martha updat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Silvermanjesusmagic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Silvermanjesusmagic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gabemann.jpg

I have tagged Image:Gabemann.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 16:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tinoalbumcover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tinoalbumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Babyboomdvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Babyboomdvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:STARTREK6 D1-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:STARTREK6 D1-1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 00:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craven_large.jpg

I have tagged Image:Craven_large.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sam_bond1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sam_bond1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 04:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DIRTY_HARRY-4.jpg

I have tagged Image:DIRTY_HARRY-4.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sam_bond1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sam_bond1.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews Interview with John Vanderslice

You edited the John Vanderslice article. Wikinews is schedule to do an interview with Vanderslice this Wednesday, September 26. If you have any questions you'd like to ask John or know about John, please leave them on my Talk page. Thanks. --David Shankbone 15:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:052594837601ZZZZ.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:052594837601ZZZZ.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Natalisecover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Natalisecover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Elizabeth kostova.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Elizabeth kostova.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: # Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 21:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Danny Aiello.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Danny Aiello.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Imagestart 03:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Danny Aiello.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danny Aiello.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Imagestart 03:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Leggero

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Natasha Leggero, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B0000778887.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:B0000778887.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sincityfinishedfilmcomparis.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sincityfinishedfilmcomparis.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 09:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SIN CITY-1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SIN CITY-1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SIN CITY-2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SIN CITY-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SIN CITY-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SIN CITY-3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Thatsmybush.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Thatsmybush.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr If you've written a quality article... 17:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thatsmybush.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thatsmybush.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr If you've written a quality article... 17:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thrillerscreenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrillerscreenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cocainemagcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cocainemagcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Historiancover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Historiancover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Main leggero.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Main leggero.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dariatitle.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dariatitle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Kuehlsheila.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuehlsheila.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: # Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Great dictator 1024.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Great dictator 1024.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thirdship (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LookingforMrGoodbar.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:LookingforMrGoodbar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lelandorseralien.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lelandorseralien.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr If you've written a quality article... 20:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Selena.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Selena.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: # Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Polly (Parrot) 19:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SIN CITY-3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SIN CITY-3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cocainemagcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cocainemagcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:STARTREK6 D1-0.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:STARTREK6 D1-0.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Greed (1925 movie)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Greed (1925 movie), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Greed (1925 movie) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Greed (1925 movie), please affix the template {{Template:hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Thirdman1-9950.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thirdman1-9950.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dvdplr (talk) 19:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HangingUp2000.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:HangingUp2000.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dkeatongodfather.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dkeatongodfather.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freeuseorpd.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Freeuseorpd.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rufus Wainwright invitation

You are invited to join WikiProject Rufus Wainwright, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to Rufus Wainwright. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to Wainwright. The Rufus Wainwright WikiProject group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

This brand new project is looking for members to help improve articles related to Wainwright. Feel free to join! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joey Yale

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joey Yale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: :Entirely unsourced negative biography All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. decltype (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Playgirlatkinscover.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Playgirlatkinscover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. APK that's not my name 18:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC) APK that's not my name 18:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fallout boy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 8 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: # Leland Orser - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Condoleezza Rice

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Condoleezza Rice/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Grable1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grable1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: # Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jessegillan (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNDEFINED-1.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:UNDEFINED-1.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Treehouse of Horror

Please weigh in on Template talk:Treehouse of Horror#Inclusion of episode segments, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eggs benedict, December 12, 2005.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Eggs benedict, December 12, 2005.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 18:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC) Could you tell me on which films did Quetin Tarrantino, Martin Scorsese, the Coen Brothers and Ridley Scott have Final Cut Privilege????????????/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.113.159.74 (talk) 11:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC) Could you tell me on which films did Quetin Tarrantino, Martin Scorsese, the Coen Brothers and Ridley Scott have Final Cut Privilege????????????/[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Non-free mugshot

Template:Non-free mugshot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ExtraordinaryCvr.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ExtraordinaryCvr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 23:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thirdman1-9950.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thirdman1-9950.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HangingUp2000.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:HangingUp2000.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The love that dare not speak its name for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The love that dare not speak its name is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The love that dare not speak its name until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diane Keaton FAR

Seeing as a FAR must notify interested parties, I want to let you know that I have nominated Diane Keaton for a featured article review. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smile lines listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smile lines. Since you had some involvement with the Smile lines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nakedcoverc11418.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nakedcoverc11418.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Battle royale pochette.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Battle royale pochette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain text

It appears that you added the text "use this work for any purpose, without any conditions" to the public domain templates on Wikipedia back in 2005. Where did you get the specific wording from? Sbp (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mug shots has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mug shots, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 18:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising cliches listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Advertising cliches. Since you had some involvement with the Advertising cliches redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of the best movie sequels listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of the best movie sequels. Since you had some involvement with the List of the best movie sequels redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:True crime films has been nominated for discussion

Category:True crime films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dariatitle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dariatitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dkeatongodfather.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dkeatongodfather.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]