User talk:Fabregado

Welcome!

Hello, Fabregado, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Godwin ezeemo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yeryry (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Godwin ezeemo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Godwin ezeemo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://godwinezeemo1.blogspot.com/2017/02/anambra-can-be-better-all-you-need-to.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yeryry (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ezeemo Godwin Chukwunaenye

The article Ezeemo Godwin Chukwunaenye has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ezeemo Godwin Chukwunaenye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ezeemo Godwin Chukwunaenye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, would you agree that Godwin Ezeemo looks better? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's better. I am still not sure that it establishes biographical notability to survive an AFD, but that is a different test than A7. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Godwin Ezeemo, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma, from its old location at User:Fabregado/Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 19:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Draft:Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sailor 07:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Draft:Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Sam Sailor 07:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Above {{uw-autobiography}} superseded by {{uw-paid1}} posted below, cf. disclosure on my talk page now at Special:Permalink/859423673#I want to have my article published. Sam Sailor 17:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma

Hi, I'm Rosguill. Fabregado, thanks for creating Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Some claims are attached to citations that do not support those claims: in particular, the citation attached to "Film maker of the year 2018" does not support that claim.

Additionally, the article could use some copy-editing for grammar and for WP:TONE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

_signed,Rosguill^talk 21:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected all the concerns raised. What is the next step to take?

I have duly corrected all the errors raised above, I would like to know if there are other concern that i haven't corrected . Fabregado (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello Fabregado. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Obinna Onyebuchi Muoma, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fabregado. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fabregado|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Sailor 17:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

<<<<My response>>>> Hello Sam,it's good to have you back after a long time of silence. I'm disappointed with the allegations on my person. I'm yet to know where all these allegations are coming from. However, I have stated clearly in my last argument, that the young man in question has done tremendous work in our movie industry. He has done great things for himself and for people around him. A little research could have given you much insight than what you alleged. I'm very proud of what the young man has done, and that is the only reason why I deemed it fit to upload his details here. This platform was established to have important people,event,location etc recorded. We all have a responsibility to ensure that the integrity of this platform is not questioned. Unless you are telling me that the platform is reserved for certain people from certain places. I dare opine that nobody in Hollywood who has achieved half of what this young man has achieved would be questioned the way and manner he is being question.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ifeanyi Momah (politician) has been accepted

Ifeanyi Momah (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer T·C 04:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scooptrend

Hi, I've noticed you frequently use the website, "Scooptrend" as a source. Could you please kindly refrain from using it, although some its content is most likely correct, it is a low-class source and fails as a reliable source. The content they provide can easily be found on another reliable sources/websites. I've also noticed you add Scooptrend citations to articles where there's already citations, meaning you're overlinking so I'm not sure if you have a personal connection the site, but if so, it is highly inappropriate to cite it, as it constitutes conflict of interest. AshMusique (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response on Scooptrend

Hi, I must admit that your observation is quite correct and your concern is highly appreciated. However, all my content are 100 percent correct, well researched and informative.

I am yet to reach the level of big platform, but we are registered and authentic and have many exclusive information than those big platforms. The addition to some of the articles has always been enriching the content to expand the scope.

However, i have taken note of this, and will surely make proper adjustment.

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeriq tha hussla

Hello, Fabregado

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeriq tha hussla for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeriq moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jeriq, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No amount of editing can confer notability on this person. You will only be wasting your own time if you persist with this. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeriq (December 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Celestina007 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A biographical article for a musician must satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Furthermore please our general notability criteria, what Wikipedia is WP:NOT, WP:COI & WP:PAID

Celestina007 (talk) 03:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabregado! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Celestina007 (talk) 03:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Fabregado! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My article was unjustly rejected and i am protesting against this decision., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeriq

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeriq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello Fabregado. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fabregado. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fabregado|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This allegation is really sad to hear, I always get this type of treatment each time I try to contribute to Wikipedia. I come from a place where most well-known individuals are hardly represented online, and being someone that has little knowledge of Wikipedia I try to make a meaningful contribution to those well-known individuals on Wikipedia. I have never received a dime from this, I am interested in having them represented online. if you notice, they are mostly from a particular region. So I implore you to look at this with an open mind to make the right decision.

Can you please explain how this is your own work or how you became the copyright holder? also how is this your own work? Praxidicae (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the nature of my job, I have met a couple of popular individuals. The [[1]] picture can not be found online as it was sent from the studio straight to me, then the [[2]] picture was gottent from his social media handle, which i did not use anyway.

Concern regarding Draft:Jeriq

Hello, Fabregado. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeriq, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jeriq.jpg

The file File:Jeriq.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for previous version of Draft:Jeriq. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeriq moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jeriq, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to support assertions that are currently unreferenced, while parts, particularly the final section needs, rewriting in a more encyclopedic tone. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 07:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Paul W, but I have done the correction, I would appreciate it if you take a closer look at it. I have been writing about this topic, Jeriq for months and have received only deletion and rejection. Fabregado (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my earlier, more detailed response to the note you added on my Talk page - here. Best wishes. Paul W (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeriq has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeriq. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have made corrections, please kindly check and help me. Fabregado (talk) 00:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Fabregado! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do i get this article Draft:Jeriq published?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeriq (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, see WP:TOOSOON. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeriq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 10:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeriq (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no meaningful changes since last decline

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeriq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jeriq

Hello, Fabregado. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeriq".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]