User talk:Evangelos Giakoumatos

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anubis

I'm reverting you here for removing a reliable source and replacing it with one that doesn't meet our criteria at WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. Jenny Hill [1] is not a source we should be using. Dougweller (talk) 17:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Evangelos Giakoumatos. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 21:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dougweller (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dilophosaurus

Hello, Evangelos;

Thank you for stopping by! I will take a close look at Dilophosaurus over the weekend. Incidentally, User:Dinoguy2 (aka MMartyniuk) is the resident theropod expert, but I will certainly do what I can! J. Spencer (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made one pass, and I'll make a second pass tomorrow. I've mostly consolidated statements and added formatting, so far. J. Spencer (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that occasionally the added material might be a bit too close to the text of the original sources, so you might want to watch out for that. J. Spencer (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I will be more careful with paraphrasing from these sources. Thank you.Evangelos Giakoumatos (talk) 03:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==References== Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal suicide

Hi, just saw you discussion on Doc James page about the misconception of suicide increasing in winter. Coincidentally I just heard or read a report about how Greenland has one of the highest suicide rates. I assumed they would be higher in winter because of the practically continuous darkness. The article mentioned that suicides were highest in summer. My guess is that in the winter if someone is depressed they simply sleep or go into vegetative state and have less willpower to take the action of suicide. In the summer with hotter weather and constant light it is harder to escape the demons in one's mind and harder to sleep so already being agitated and away, it is a much smaller step to just put an end to it all. Another example of what I thought was common knowledge was backwards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sthubbar (talk • contribs) 00:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sthubbar, I have seen the same misconception repeated in movies and in the media. It follows that people that are estranged from their families experience the loss more vividly during holidays. I work with persons diagnosed with mental illness and some of the more brutal suicides I have seen over the years were close to the holidays and often involved rejection by parents and children, which served as an antecedent to the suicide. Despite this, the data is clear, even when examining smaller sample sets, that majority of suicides (i.e. suicide attempts that are fatal) do not occur during the winter holiday season and actually peak during spring and early summer. Thank you for your feedback. Your comments about winter and depression, hotter weather, and insomnia certainly make sense to me and are shared by other mental health professionals.Evangelos Giakoumatos (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dino star

		The Dinosaur Barnstar
		For all your recent work on expanding long-neglected articles about early theropods! Keep it up! FunkMonk (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're making good progress on the dinosaurs, I think it won't be long before you could nominate one of the longer articles for "Good Article". In that case, just remember that the intro should be a summary of the entire article, the intros are on the short side at present. FunkMonk (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dinosaur diagnosis

Hey Evangelos Giakoumatos, thank you for all your good work! I wonder if we should add complete diagnoses to every dinosaur article. When I write dinosaur articles, I only choose two or three examples for autapomorphies, and explain them, so that people can understand. There are several points: First, we write an encyclopedia. We invest much energy in the readability and comprehensibility of dinosaur articles while presenting a broad covering of important information. These diagnoses don't fit into the articles that contain only the very necessary technical terms. You need to be a paleontologist to fully understand what the single autapomorphies mean, and you have to be an expert of that certain group to find it interesting. Second, autapomorphies are very unstable. After a few years, much of the dedicated autapomorphies will have been described in other, related taxa, making them synapomorphies of much more inclusive groups. Autapomorphies age very fast. That is the reason why we have so many Nomina dubia. In your diagnoses sections, you list every autapomorphy that has been noted by distinct paleontologists (e.g., Herrerasaurus). Actually, most of these former autapomorphies are not autapomorphies of that taxon any longer, but synapomorphies of Herrerasauridae or something else. Third, autapomorphies are very interpretive. If two different paleontologists work on the same material, you will get three different diagnoses.

There are problems related to this kind of diagnoses sections. Even the Paleobiology Database, which contains much information about single genera, does not contain diagnoses. I would prefer to keep the articles as short, as pregnant, as comprehensive, and as readable as possible. What do you think? Sorry for this long text, but this is something I want to talk about. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 08:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, lets discuss. I will send you an e-mail Jens.

Griebeler et al.

Hi,

thanks for adding the new study. However, in the case of Plateosaurus, your edit misrepresented the full study by selecting only one out of many cases, a case that was NOT specifically selected by the authors as "best case". You should have either added the full range, or the two best cases. As is, your edit cannot be retained. If I find time I will add it back in, and amend it so it does full justice to the data my colleagues found.

Now I need to check the other articles, too. HMallison (talk) 09:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I mean that the table in G. et al. presents TWO most likely cases for Plateosaurus. These bracket a range. Citing only ONE but not saying that it is only one out of a bracketed range is what I didn't like. What you should do is give the full range of results, or you can use the text. That is, after all, what G. et al. decided to make of their data. :D All the rest of your edit was fine!

by the way, in the Plateosaurus article please note that the references are listed in the references section, i.e. the text is entered not in the main text. I can do that for you :) HMallison (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cryolophosaurus

Hi Evangelos. I couldn't help but notice that a little while ago you expanded the Paleoecology section in Cryolophosaurus. Do you happen to have the refs for the second section still, specifically the sentence about petrified wood? If you do could you please inform me or add it? Many thanks. Iainstein (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why

Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town

He sees you when you sleeping, he knows when you're awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for your life's sake

Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why

Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town

Merry Christmas, and watch out for the Christmas Velociraptor, IJReid (talk) 25 December 2014

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Evangelos Giakoumatos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Evangelos Giakoumatos/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Evangelos Giakoumatos, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not significant enough for notability, sources are not enough and will need all additional ones.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Evangelos Giakoumatos/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arcadia Handicap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Evangelos Giakoumatos/sandbox

Hello, Evangelos Giakoumatos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 02:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Evangelos Giakoumatos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Pasqual Handicap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sadler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Evangelos Giakoumatos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]