User talk:Eumat114/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eumat114. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your thread has been archived
Hi The Lord of Math! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Guilin North railway station has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Nanning East railway station has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Signature Test Place
Lord of Math (Prove me wrong) 02:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
數神, the Lord of Math (Prove me wrong; My contributions to the world in numbers) 06:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message; contribs) (Report false positive) 16:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Reporter: User:79.65.214.46
- Article: '
- Rationale:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:79.65.214.46
I would be curious to know what the problem is! I simplified two bits of poor English, and corrected the age of one of the victims (a male foetus, 16 weeks into pregnancy)
- Thanks. I realized my mistake, and I must have overlooked the rest of the passage. Thanks, and welcome! tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 13:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
About my edits on football (title added by me)
Because The players from Denmark as known as a “football” is actually Soccer ball, because in Denmark and in many other places they a very big difference with and between football-the American football and The Soccer ball and that is actually about Soccer ball and many person’s and people’s are playing soccer ball here in Denmark, but this is not about American football and the word footballer it’s not the right word here, and The DBU is The Danish National Soccer ball union here in Denmark, but not a football union/American football, but now you know it ;) :) and PS I hope you can use it and use this instead of football/American football/footballer, but in this case is the Soccer ball the right word because of the soccer ball team here in Denmark, and we have not so much American football teams in Denmark, but now you also know that :) ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.115.127.242 (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Meizhou West railway station has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Joanna Tse has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)- Thanks for this interesting and relevant article. When you translate an article from another wiki, please note this in the edit summary or use an attribution template on the talk page like I did here [1], per Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects. :) SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 02:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Romanov's theorem has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you restored a bunch of inappropriate external links to FEDOR (robot). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Could you explain why you think my edits "did not appear constructive" and why you think these links should be added to the page? 153.204.42.250 (talk) 10:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I literally swore at myself just now. How have I not checked what these were? If I have done more checks (and bothered to look at the edit summary box) I wouldn't have done this! Thanks ~ tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 10:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi The Lord of Math! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
~Swarm~ {sting} 23:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Technical issue
@DragonAnimators and Laurine Verweijen: and the 5 other IPs: I'm sorry, but I had a technical problem with SWViewer, and accidentally mass reverted your edits. I've reverted myself. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 12:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
So what does this mean? Sorry, I'm new but does this mean all of my edits were erased? Oh, and it's okay. Everybody makes mistakes. DragonAnimators (Message) 13:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @DragonAnimators: Oh, everything's okay now. That issue accidentally undid 7 edits, of which one of them were made by you. I fixed that bug, and now all 7 edits - including yours - were restored. Thanks! tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 13:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Lord of Math: OK. Thanks for the quick reply! DragonAnimators (Message) 13:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Garissone Innocent (March 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garissone Innocent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Garissone Innocent, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Garissone Innocent has a new comment
Your thread has been archived
Hi The Lord of Math! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi The Lord of Math! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | ||
Congratulations, The Lord of Math You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hello! The Lord of Math,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 02:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kolpak ruling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolpak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Oi (Scooter song) (March 22)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oi (Scooter song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oi (Scooter song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Oh - not yours - the AFCH tool does this automatically as you added your self as the submitter. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I'm sure this and User:The Lord of Maff/sandbox is some test edit or something you're working out that I missed the memo on, just making sure you were aware of it and it wasn't created by accident. Cheers Sulfurboy (talk) 05:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sulfurboy, exactly. If you check on WP:AFC, I am experimenting some changes to the standard templates. It appears to be working. Thanks for the reminder! TLOM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 05:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Templates
Here is another question about what is probably an experiment. Some of the AFC reviewers use a category, Category:AfC submissions with the same name as existing articles, which identifies drafts that have the same names as pages in article space. They may be duplicate drafts of topics on which we already have an article, or they may be people with the same name, or they may be redirects, such as a redirect of a song to the album. You have created two new templates, Template:New AFC submission/submit, and Template:New AFC submission/pending, and they are showing up in the category. They probably indicate that there is something odd about the way that the category works, in particular with titles that have slashes in them. Could you take a quick check and let me know whether I should just ignore the listing of your templates in the category?
Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, yes. You may ignore the listings. It appeared that I am trying to make slight modifications to the existing templates (those without the "New" in it) but neglected to suppress the categories, and that is the reason why you're seeing this in Template:New AFC submission/submit but not in, say, Template:AFC submission/submit. Thanks for your attention, TLOM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 05:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)