User talk:Eucrm

This is Eucrm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collaboration Vouchers (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unreferenced – where is all this information coming from? The sources aren't enough to establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collaboration Vouchers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eucrm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Collaboration Vouchers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Collaboration Vouchers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/collaboration-vouchers-ben-heslop. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding your own commentary

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry what are you referring to exactly? Eucrm (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Australian Aboriginal identity, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Public employment service, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Eucrm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I suppose I will have to abandon my efforts or spend serious time doing the research. Eucrm (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR and WP:RS

If you are finding things difficult at this point - try getting a very good handle on WP:OR and WP:RS - before reacting to other editors in any way, or reverting their edits in any way. It is imperative for you to understand that unreferenced material is not acceptable, and that WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT are clearly understood. Thanks, take care... JarrahTree 10:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JarrahTree *sigh* I guess I'll need to do the work. Don't know how you justify policing people like me without being paid. Eucrm (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The psychic damage is permanent, and you need to wash your mouth out/rinse your keyboard in relation to renumeration, that's quite verbotten. Never identify yourself as anything on wiki - every edit is always easily found - the smaller your edit count the easier to find. My gaffes are multidunious if not numerous, hidden under sheer volume of edits. The work requires verifiable and accessible reliable sources. Allusions to anything without sources are usually zapped mercilessly, specially after warnings/information about wp:OR have been given.JarrahTree 11:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hi, you've disclosed a conflict of interest (COI) on your userpage, for Collaboration Vouchers / Collaboration vouchers. You shouldn't therefore have created that article directly in the main article space yourself, but should have gone through the AfC review process instead (like you did initially; I remember reviewing your draft a couple of months ago). I should really move it back to drafts now, but hesitate to do so as the article has been already reviewed and accepted by a fellow new page reviewer. Please bear this in mind going forward, though. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]