User talk:Estrva
|
A tag has been placed on SGPstore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 21:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Commission on International Trans-Regional Accreditation, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.citaschools.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I wanted to thank you for your contribution and also provide you a "welcome" notice above that includes some links you might find helpful. This particular article has been deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a copyright infringement of the external site and there is no evidence that its use is permitted here. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material without such evidence (see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials or Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for more.) You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases, except in the limited circumstances set out at our non-free content guidelines.
- If you do choose to create a new article on this subject, please consider reading over Wikipedia:Your first article, which has some helpful information about the kinds of material that Wikipedia can and cannot host. You might also want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Allied High Schools
[edit]I have nominated Allied High Schools, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied High Schools. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Neuro√Logic 21:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Aoi college
[edit]A tag has been placed on Aoi college, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Aoicollege
[edit]A tag has been placed on Aoicollege, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of AOI College
[edit]A tag has been placed on AOI College, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Terrillja talk 16:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Allied Business Schools
[edit]I have nominated Allied Business Schools, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Business Schools. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm about to remove your most recent changes to the Sabrina Kay article for a couple of reasons. Firstly, you have a habit of adding what we at Wikipedia call peacock words. Give that link a click. It talks about how your writing should be neutral, and should avoid overly-complementary language that does not impart real information. Using your most recent edit, "this dynamic entrepreneur" is a good example of what we're talking about here. Also, unsourced future plans for this individual isn't a great idea either, because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Thirdly, simply mentioning that she has been mentioned in major newspapers, without citing articles themselves does us no good, because verifiability is a key aspect of Wikipedia. I'd also like you to take a look at the conflict of interest guidelines. It is clear that you have a significant conflict of interest with the subjects of the articles you have been creating, and as you can see, writing while you have a conflict of interest regularly leads to articles that do not have a neutral point of view. Hope this message isn't too long, but I do hope you take the time to reflect on your style of editing as a means to improve the quality of your contributions to Wikipedia. Cheers, Steamroller Assault (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Estrva for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Steamroller Assault (talk) 20:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Two week block for socking
[edit] | It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Estrva, and you are therefore blocked for a period of two weeks. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 06:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC) |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mycaa, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.military.com/education/content/money-for-school/military-spouse-career-advancement-accounts-financial-aid.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mycaa
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mycaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 18:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Biker Biker (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)