User talk:Engines On

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to English people appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Gscshoyru 21:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add the Sykes reference to the opening paragraphs. It is an interesting and useful addition, but it belongs in the section on the genetics, not in the introduction. Sykes is not the most important geneticist in the world, he is one of many and should not be treated with favoritism. Cop 663 02:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michael Konik. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 03:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English people

Hi, if you want to discuss the settlement of Great Britain and Ireland then there is a specific article where you can do this. See Settlement of Great Britain and Ireland. This article is specifically for discussing genetics and origins and is not about ethnicity. Remember ethnicity is a social-cultural construct and is about collective beliefs in origins and not necessarily origins themselves. Having a specific and different article about the actual genetic and biological relationships between the peoples who occupy the islands surrounding Great Britain and Ireland makes sense from this perspective don't you think? All the best, and consider contributing to the settlement article, it could do with a lot of work, tidying up and copy editing etc. if you are interested in contributing and have the time. All the best. Alun 07:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacoby Ellsbury

Hello. The family info you are providing on the Jacoby Ellsbury page is not notable, nor is what a high school play-by-play announcer thinks. Ellsbury is also still a prospect and is not a star of any magnitude until he has spent time proving his talent in more than 20% of 1 MLB season. Please do not clog the article with non-notable information. Thank you AZrooter (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Epeefleche. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Jews in sports, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Needs a ref to a reliable source. Please re-add if you find one. Many thanks. Epeefleche (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Atlas

Hi,

I see you have used this reference http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0002_0_01559.html to put that David Atlas is Jewish. Although it is from the Jewish Virtual Library, it never says that Dr. Atlas is actually a Jew and one cannot assume this. Could you provide a better reference?

Pierre cb (talk) 23:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pierre,

In answer to your question, the source of the Jewish Virtual Library is the Encyclopaedia Judaica which contains biographies of renowned Jews (among them is David Atlas). Engines On (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then it would be better to cite that source, with the exact pages (the one in Jewish Virtual Library could be as a Resume). Pierre cb (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Engines On. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Engines On. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Engines On. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jim and Mary McCartney; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ——SerialNumber54129 17:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have to come back, but this was blatant WP:CANVASSING. Do it once more and it'll be The Long And Winding Road That Leads to AN/I. Cheers! ——SerialNumber54129 15:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will cease and desist from canvassing. I regret that my attempt, at recruiting agreeable opinions to my own, was perceived as subterfuge. It wasn't my intention to violate the Wikipedia rules of conduct. Engines On (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]