User talk:Energymeat
February 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm OnlyNano. I noticed that you recently removed content from AFM Gousal Azam Sarker without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You should not have removed that information, and it's source. I would take a look at editing policies before you continue editing, to make sure you don't continue to get warned. OnlyNano 17:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at AFM Gousal Azam Sarker, you may be blocked from editing. Again, this content should not be removed. Please stop editing the article and contact me on my talk page to discuss your edits. (My talk page) OnlyNano 17:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- There are competing sources of information on a conspiracy to discredit Ambassador AFM Gousal Azam Sarker which have been published in accusation against and in contradiction of. As a result, this would fall within the content policy of Wikipedia not to publish contentious information on living individuals where multiple sources cannot adequately verify the truth. Content should be redacted / negatively charged language softened / multiple competing sources kept in. The citations for the content and the citation for the reason of edit have been provided in summary log. Thanks. Energymeat (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there, so upon some further looking, I'll have some others look over this. It appears BDNEWS24 is the only source saying that AFM Gousal Azam Sarker was a victim of conspiracy. Furthermore, The Daily Star (a much more reputable source) conflicts that information, so I will have to keep going over this. As an editor of Wikipedia, you too have the power to look over things yourself. If you believe your edit is correct, keep digging, and let's end this with consensus. OnlyNano 18:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have created a query on The Teahouse to get some more input on this, and I will keep you posted. Again, please do not continue to make edits about the conspiracy, or you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, if you have a conflict of interest on this subject, please declare it on your user page. Thanks! OnlyNano 18:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey there, so upon some further looking, I'll have some others look over this. It appears BDNEWS24 is the only source saying that AFM Gousal Azam Sarker was a victim of conspiracy. Furthermore, The Daily Star (a much more reputable source) conflicts that information, so I will have to keep going over this. As an editor of Wikipedia, you too have the power to look over things yourself. If you believe your edit is correct, keep digging, and let's end this with consensus. OnlyNano 18:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at AFM Gousal Azam Sarker. This is your last warning. Please stop editing AFM Gousal Azam Sarker to introduce information that we are currently in dispute about. Please wait for us both to come to consensus before continuing to edit this page with the conspiracy article. Other minor edits, such as photos and such are fine, but you need to stop adding/removing information or sources about the suspected conspiracy, until we come to an agreement. Thank you. OnlyNano 18:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)