User talk:Emperorbma

Archives:

Justification article

Hi,

I noticed that you appeared in the edit history of the justification (theology) article. I recently made major changes to the article in an effort to move it to NPOV. If you have any suggestions for improvement (style, content, whatever), please leave a comment on the talk page for that article. The goal is to get the article to the point that the POV and cleanup templates can be removed.

Thanks, --jrcagle 20:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can fix profiles of characters at Guadam

You can do research and add profiles. The link is http://www.gundamofficial.com/worlds/uc/msg/characters/

Copyright violation allegations: Tourism in Japan

Hi Emperorbma,

A user has put a copyright violation template on the article Tourism in Japan, to which you (and I) contributed. I think the copying is in reverse, that is, the external site copied the Wikipedia article. What do you think?

Fg2 20:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theology of glory page

Theology of Glory

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Theology of Glory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Theology of Glory. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Pastordavid 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That'd make sense to me. I have revised the theology of the cross page (no references tonight, I should get to that first thing in the morning). Since I put up the prod on the theology of glory page, someone else should merge it. Pastordavid 06:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted vandalism

I've reverted some apparent vandalism to your userpage by this anon IP, and warned the vandal. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Lutheranism

You are invited to participate in Lutheranism WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Lutheranism. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

-- Pastordavid 22:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheranism

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Please stop by and give your opinion on the two proposed barnstars for WikiProject Lutheranism. Pastor David ^† _(Review) 18:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Geologic timescale

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Geologic timescale seems to be inactive. The idea is to take it under the roof of the Geology Project. Would you mind joining it? Solarapex 23:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Edinburgh underground city

A reading of the opening paragraph of underground city is enough to know it doesn't really apply to Edinburgh. Today the term "Underground City" is mostly exploited by the tourist industry, but it's hardly warranted. I'll expand on it in the Edinburgh article and restore the wikilink somehow. Bendž|Ť 17:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for heads up

I renamed the userboxes page that you asked me about (it was inadvertently misnamed--first time I'd created such a page); and I archived our discussion a few hours later. (You can find it now in User talk:NYScholar/Archive 11.) Do you think that the old page needs to be deleted, or would requesting that deletion now delete the redirected page? Thanks. If you reply here, I will find see your reply. (Please see: User:NYScholar/Userboxes for the renamed/redirected page.) --NYScholar 19:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome and I'm glad my comment was helpful. :) Also, it probably would be a good idea to check everything in Special:Whatlinkshere/User:NYScholar/Userboxes to see if anything important (besides automated lists) links to it. I didn't see it in the Rules, but I think that usually the admins frown on user stuff in the main namespace because it might mess with search results, so it probably would be good to ask about deletion. -- EmperorBMA|話す 19:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I have asked for the earlier page to be deleted. --NYScholar 06:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Incurvatus in se

Hope you don't mind the secularisation, but I feel it is essential to WP:NPOV, as well as to establishing the individuals you cite as real people, philosophers and WP:RS? Though a committed atheist I have a lifelong affection for theology as a discipline and theologians as thinkers.

I am delighted to see a theological construct that is over a thousand years old that parallels EXACTLY the relatively modern (in spite of the classical connotations of it's name) concept of "Narcissism". Particularly if you look at Narcissism (psychology) and the way the psychoanalysts developed the concept. --Zeraeph 17:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for great ref, it is SO important to show that there is more to Narcissism as a concept than online pop psychology. Is it not curious how close Martin Luther (and very likely Augustine) were to the thinking of Freud and later others? --Zeraeph 16:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or course we tend to forget that these people were not special "biblical and historical" people, with especially limited "biblical and historical"minds and lives...truth is, I suppose the philosophers and priests often took the same role as the psychologists of today. --Zeraeph 18:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: Request for Speedy Delete (H-World)

A tag has been placed on H-World, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No assertion of importance of subject.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

AfD nomination of Wallaby (manga)

Wallaby (manga), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Wallaby (manga) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallaby (manga) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wallaby (manga) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Quasirandom 19:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VirtualDubMod

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article VirtualDubMod, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nanori

Hi! I saw you created Nanori in Wiktionary. I'm a Japanese and there is no meaning of the No.1 definition of Nanori in Japanese. I checked Kojien and other dictionaries but couldn't find the meaning. Other Japanese editor pointed out the same thing on the talk page too. Please correct the article. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Sorry it was illiterate of me. Please forget about it. Best regards. Oda Mari (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Virtues of Ultima

An editor has nominated Virtues of Ultima, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtues of Ultima and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Guardian (Ultima)

I have nominated Guardian (Ultima), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian (Ultima). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forfeiture listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Forfeiture. Since you had some involvement with the Forfeiture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). CobraGeek ^{CU owns USC jr.} 00:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up. I think the redirect to Asset Forfeiture from Forfeiture is a little limiting. --CobraGeek ^{CU owns USC jr.} 00:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Coalition for Freedom of Information

I have nominated Coalition for Freedom of Information, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coalition for Freedom of Information. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Liddo-kun's Big Adventure

I have nominated Liddo-kun's Big Adventure, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liddo-kun's Big Adventure. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dandy Sephy (talk) 04:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:InuYasha objects

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:InuYasha objects, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:InuYasha objects has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:InuYasha objects, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must have done something wrong

I attempted to add to your article on Martian Successor Nadesico and its been delited so either i didn't put it up right or something umm heres the sum of what i put up, if you wish to add it in properly that would be great.

Nadesico had a wide arrangement ships whether it be the High Mobile Battleships, U.E.A.F various ships, the Jovian ships or the Astevalis, or the various shuttles and standard fighters

Nergal Heavy industries High Mobile Battleships – These ships were designed as the first actual defense against the “Jovian Jovian’s” and their Phase transition driven ships, these ships came standard with their own phase transition engines as well as their primary armament the Gravity Blast cannon. A list of these ships follows. ND-001 Nadesico- the first battleship created by Nergal it later received a Y unit which gave it 4 phase transition engines instead of the standard 2 and gave it an added weapon called the PT cannon (Phase Transition cannon which imposed 2 folds of space over the same area thus obliterating all matter within the area. ND-002 Cosmos- The Nadesico’s sister ship and first ship to employ a multi barrel Gravity Blast Canon. Also this ship doubled as a space dock facility for all Nadesico class ships, it achieved this by altering its configuration by splitting the forward section and extending it, the one drawback appeared to be that neither the cosmos nor the ship docked in its bay could move during this procedure. ND-003 Shaku-yaku this ship an identical clone of the Nadesico unfortunately never launched it was crushed before it could be completed and its distortion fields raised, however this ship was a prototype using the Y unit to create the PT cannon as explained above. ND-004 kakitsubata The Chairman’s personal battleship, more agile than the ND-001 it also had no visible restrictions to the number of gravity blasts it could fire while in a planet’s atmosphere as opposed to the ND-001 which could only fire 1 gravity blast every 20 minutes Astevalis- a mecha combat frame which could be armed with various weapons and can be configured to different configurations, all Astevalis are powered by a Gravitron Wave Beam a form of directed energy from whatever Nergal ship they are launched from they also like the High Mobile Battleships have a distortion field that when used in an high velocity attack becomes a fairly devastating weapon. This mode of attack is only available to the air and space combat frames for obvious reasons. Their standard weapons are a machine gun type weapon as well as a knife capable of penetrating distortion fields however angle of attack is key there.

Ground combat frame – this Astevalis is the most basic version with a jump jet for short liftoffs, it carries the same armaments as all the other frames with the exception of the heavy weapons frame with one addition a so called Gekigen punch. This attack uses one of the robots fists and shoots it out, its connected to the Astevalis by some sort of high grade wire. Air combat unit - This unit is used for inter atmosphere and sub orbital combat as first seen in episode (3?) this unit has one additional feature that the fore mentioned models don’t, its cockpit and head peace are interchangeable while in flight, this operation is codenamed “cross crash” by Guy Digoji/jyro Yamata. Space Combat frame- this frame is for combat in space obviously, it’s a slimmer model than the land air or heavy weapons frame. The smaller size in combination with the 4 thrusters plus at least 8 other orientation thrusters provide for better than average mobility. Heavy weapons frame- This frame is truly just an ad on to almost any frame except for the space frame, its designed to take extreme punishment and deliver an incredible payload which includes standard rockets and a large gun capable of firing delayed explosive rounds or several other types not specified, not much is said about this model other than it is meant to blow a lot of things up.

U.E.A.F Not many specifics were given as to the types and numbers of the U.E.A.F Fleet however everything from traditional fighter jets to interstellar battleships were seen, their primary weapons until Nergal Heavy Industries contracted with them seemed to be some sort of laser, which proved utterly ineffective. Once however, the U.E.A.F contracted with Nergal presumably their fleet was updated relatively quickly,(the show suggests that nearly their entire lunar operations fleet.) was outfitted with Gravity Blast Cannons and Phase Transition Engines.

Jovian Lizards/The Jovian Superior Male Forces (To save time ill just refer to them as the Jovian’s.)

The Jovian’s employed shockingly few variations of their crafts, the grasshoppers and jiros (so named by the U.E.A.F.) The Small medium and large battleships that would make up the bulk of the lizard’s unmanned fleet, latter the Jovian’s introduced a multi sectioned ship which was never named except for its weaponry, this craft was the first and only craft to hold actual Jovian’s living humans, though they had been genetically enhanced to withstand the stress of bosun jumping through the chulips . This type of craft held 2 advantages over all others. The first was the Bosun or Leap cannon which jumped warheads to precise locations; its only downfall was its range limitation. It couldn’t jump a warhead passed the Nadesico’s standard range. The second was its cargo, the Daimajin or Dinjin for short, also called a Geki-Gengar and goliath type by Ruri Hoshino onboard the Nadesico

As you can see i tried to make a comprehensive list of all major ships and notable tech in the anime as i noticed it was lacking it, if you want me to change it or do something different just tell me and ill see what i can do, thanks Drop me a line at chapin.mahoney@gmail.com if you need anything

AfD nomination of GEICO

I have nominated GEICO, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEICO (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. South Bay (talk) 22:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

history of Oophorectomy

Since you are writer this Oophorectomy, you supposed to include history. Dr. Battery was Rome, Georgia's doctor who did first Oophorectomy in 1872. He was world's known medical history that had performed Oophorectomy! Cculber007 (talk) 10:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Bucer up for Featured Article Review

I just wanted to let you know that you can cast your vote of "support" or "oppose" to the Martin Bucer article as a potential featured article at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Martin_Bucer#Martin_Bucer. Thanks! --Epiphyllumlover--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Theme songs

Wikipedia:WikiProject Theme songs, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Theme songs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Theme songs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Coyame UFO incident

I have nominated Coyame UFO incident, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coyame UFO incident. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:InuYasha characters

I have nominated Category:InuYasha characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. G.A.S ^talk 15:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar (Ultima) article and others up for merge

You are listed as having the third most edits in the Avatar (Ultima) article, and have participated in, and even created, other Ultima articles. So this will certainly be of interest to you. It along with Lord British and The_Companions_of_the_Avatar are currently up for replacement by a redirect, with most of the content eliminated. . In addition, one Ultima topic is up for deletion at the AFD. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Worlds_of_Ultima. Please join in the discussions. Dream Focus 17:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD discussion on Sota Higurashi

In researching the Wikipedia history of Sota Higurashi for the current RfD discussion regarding Sota Higurashi, I noticed that you have previously commented on his notability. It would be very helpful to get have your thoughts added to the RfD discussion, which currently appears to be heading toward delete. Many thanks. —Zach425 ^talk/contribs 08:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Junko Sakurada

An article that you have been involved in editing, Junko Sakurada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junko Sakurada. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Northwestgnome (talk) 09:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikal (UK artist)

The article Mikal (UK artist) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yappy2bhere (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that this notification was probably unnecessary. You originally created the page as a redirect to Michael (archangel), which is unrelated to the article that was PROD-ed. I'm sorry to have smudged your talk page. Yappy2bhere (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 04:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Modern weapons for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Modern weapons, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern weapons until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 16:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of modern weapons for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of modern weapons, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modern weapons until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mio Saeki

The article Mio Saeki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited, and no evidence of notability found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yoshie Hayasaka

The article Yoshie Hayasaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of P-chicks

The article P-chicks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. No evidence of notability. Tagged for 21 months.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mio Saeki for deletion

The article Mio Saeki is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mio Saeki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VirtualDubMod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VirtualDubMod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VirtualDubMod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FuFoFuEd (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Category:Azumanga Daioh

Category:Azumanga Daioh, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kagura (Azumanga Daioh) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kagura (Azumanga Daioh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kagura (Azumanga Daioh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayumu Kasuga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayumu Kasuga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayumu Kasuga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chiyo Mihama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiyo Mihama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiyo Mihama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zeon

The article Zeon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article seems to fail WP:FICTION and WP:GNG quite clearly. Perhaps it could be transwikified to Gundam Wikia, but as written it doesn't belong on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coyame UFO incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coyame UFO incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coyame UFO incident (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Superweapon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superweapon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superweapon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kiyonori Matsuo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiyonori Matsuo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyonori Matsuo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3x+1@Home listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3x+1@Home. Since you had some involvement with the 3x+1@Home redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SST flyer 16:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mirmo! has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mirmo!, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 10:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tiberium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiberium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiberium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oekaki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oekaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oekaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 22:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Supergun

The article Supergun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citation given in article defines or uses the word 'supergun'. The main references are German works using the world 'Riesengeschütze' (literally, 'giant guns'.) No evidence that the term 'supergun' exists as an agreed definition of a type of armament.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerus (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Control-Alt-Backspace

The article Control-Alt-Backspace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

trivial keyboard shortcut. WP:NOTMANUAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dell Sanchez

The article Dell Sanchez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable BLP, does not pass WP:GNG, no secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MaterialWorks _(talk) 18:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Avatar (Ultima) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avatar (Ultima) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar (Ultima) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Angels in Neon Genesis Evangelion

Angels in Neon Genesis Evangelion has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]