User talk:Elizabeth Musks

Welcome

Hello, Elizabeth Musks, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Elizabeth Musks, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you add copyright violation content, I'll ask that this account be blocked. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats

Please don't add "th" or "rd" to date ordinals. This is contrary to the manual of style for dates. Thanks Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mac transition to Apple Silicon, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. please stop modifying dates so that they are inconsistent with MOS:DATEFORMAT Velella ^{Velella Talk} 15:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nvidia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 17:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Stop adding "th" to dates. We don't do that--and it's certainly got nothing to do with grammar. Drmies (talk) 15:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS

You have been asked to not do this. The reason to not do it has been explained to you. Please do not start up again once your block expires. TBH, this is the most ridiculous set of WP:IDNHT I've had to block for. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elizabeth Musks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wikipedia, I’m new here and has been blocked from editing. I was intending of fixing grammar of Albert Einstein’s article. I don’t intend to sabotage any article in wikipedia, but I admit my careless mistake overlooking the protected article and I will be extra careful in the future. Hope Wikipedia could remove the block and allow me to keep editing. Elizabeth Musks (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edits like this are not useful. You were told that you shouldn't be doing that, but you simply continued. There is not other solution to this disruption but to block you. Please, do not continue that behavior when the block expires. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Wikipedia, I apologize for this wrongdoings. And I did overlook the warning issued by wikipedia till I came to the user talk page yesterday. Hope this would be a lesson for me and hope wikipedia would allow me to keep editing. Elizabeth Musks (talk) 00:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

This has nothing to do with Einstein. You have methodically made changes contrary o the WP:MOS after being asked not to. That is the issue you must address. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elizabeth Musks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Wikipedia, I wasn’t know I was being warned about adding th on the date a few times till I came to the user talk page and saw message from Wiki. But now I learnt that mistake. I’m sorry and promise won’t do the same again.

Decline reason:

These were not the only problems with your edits. Yamla (talk) 01:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.