User talk:Eliyahu S

Archives

Archive 2 04/2007 - 04/2009
Archive 1 07/2006 - 04/2007

Yak! Yak! Yak!

Um... Oops? (maybe)

Yeah, I was using the Lupin/Anti-vandal tool, which shows recent edits with typo's and provides a quick option to fix them, and I saw that one and fixed it. I don't quite know if policy approves of this sort of thing in talk pages, but I've since filtered out talk pages from the tool, so this sort of thing doesn't happen again. Sorry. (Sort of...) TheSavage Norwegian 21:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cellogic

I just read your potential article, and it seems altogether sound. The only confusion I had was that the article name and image don't match up, leading some to believe that the article's name is Flyscreen. Perhaps you could find Cellogic's logo and use the Flyscreen image in a further down section.

TheSavage Norwegian 23:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...

You know what? I don't know of an alternative template, I would just suggest replacing the first picture.

Sorry I can't help more... :7(

TheSavage Norwegian 12:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I just realized my mistake, perhaps you could move the template down a few sections...

TheSavage Norwegian 12:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vote

A long time ago you helped me on List of Honorific titles page, Can you give your opinion on it on this page .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_honorific_titles_in_popular_music_(2nd_nomination) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelvin Martinez (talk • contribs) 10:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of American Eagle Manufacturing Company

An article that you have been involved in editing, American Eagle Manufacturing Company, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Eagle Manufacturing Company. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dbratland (talk) 03:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Twig (disambiguation)

The article Twig (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unneeded disambiguation page - of 3 articles linked, 2 are redlinks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 03:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a new message at my talk

Hands On Tzedakah

Hey, my plan is to work some more with that article in the next day or two -- offline stuff has kept me busy and the piece needs to be rewritten more than copy-edited. If, in the meantime, you have some burning urge to work on the article, let me know and I'll pull my tag. MindfulJen (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Davidka

Please visit the talk page of the Davidka mortar, and give me a detailed answer on the talk page for my question. Megaidler (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy in Israel

Done [1], is not that great, because the original quality is not that good... Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to PrestaShop may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carmelit

I left a post at Talk:Carmelit#Rail / other info?. Peter Horn User talk 03:11, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Attwell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Jamie Attwell|Jamie Wayne Attwell]]] (1982– ), English football player

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deeplink (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deeplink (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeplink (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vrac (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eliyahu S. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eliyahu S. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Elaine Herzberg#Requested move 6 April 2018

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elaine Herzberg#Requested move 6 April 2018. — IVORK _Discuss 00:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eliyahu S. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cip

That's interesting Unix history you mentioned on the PIC page. I'm trying to understand historical PIC (to better understand where modern https://pikchr.org/ fits in) so any PIC history you can contribute would be good.

Dan Shearer (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deeplink (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deeplink (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeplink (company) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HighKing⁺⁺ 17:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Gessner moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mark Gessner, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 21:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I put a stub tag on it. It's one of a half dozen pages I'm in the middle of. Eliyahu S ^Talk 21:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A stub tag does not automatically make a page exempt from WP:N or WP:RS. Besides, the page was inactive for a whole hour - at least place {{Under construction}} if you are planning to work on it for prolonged periods. Silikonz💬 21:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Gessner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Gessner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is an explanation of Notability on the Talk page. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 02:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Gessner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Gessner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gessner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:It Had to Be You (2016 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:It Had to Be You (2016 film). Thanks! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear to me that this "warning" should also be sent to editors writing on the Talk page. I thought that the whole point of the Talk page was so that we could discuss things openly and achieve consensus before making potentially contentious edits to Main space pages. Are we now also supposed to "self-police" our discussion on Talk pages?!! This is starting to look like Doublethink and I'm really starting to wonder about my continued activity here . . . which is exactly what I was saying on the Talk page. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 23:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This particular message is not a warning. As it says in the first paragraph of it, it doesn't imply that there are any issues with what you've contributed. The first time you edit any article that's subject to one or more restrictions, you are likely to get an alert.

As for it applying to talk pages, as the contentious topics procedure states they are typically considered to be broadly construed and as such they apply to all edits relating to the topic, on any page and in any namespace. That includes talk pages, and project pages. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: It Had to Be You (2016 film) has been accepted

It Had to Be You (2016 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kate Simses

Hello, Eliyahu S. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kate Simses, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kate Simses

Hello, Eliyahu S. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kate Simses".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you were advised at the Teahouse, talkpages aren't fora for speculation about living persons, or soapboxes fo your views on living persons. Acroterion (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking for 'consensus to change the wording of a sentence in the article which the passage of time has proven is a *wrong claim*. If that's not what a Talk page is for then there is no point in having them! It's incredible how some editors will use any excuse to defend their own partisan views even after it is clear that they were wrong. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 21:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Sky News Australia talkpage isn't a forum for you to air your views on anybody's mental health, and this talkpage isn't a forum for you to make attacks based on your assumptions about other editors who warn you about Wikipedia policy. Acroterion (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again. The article makes a claim that is now provably untrue. Is that or is that not in your view suitable for discussion on the Talk page of said article? --Eliyahu S ^Talk 21:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then prove it with references applicable to the Sky News article, not your personal medical opinion. Talkpages aren't fora for amateur medical and psychological analysis. Acroterion (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Acroterion (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deeplink (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deeplink (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeplink (company) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The company was quietly bought out, the IP was added to a very common mobile operating system, and key personnel employed by the very large purchaser. At that point I lost interest, since it became a very minor footnote in the history of mobile computing instead of a potential shooting star. Nowadays everyone expects that they will see alerts and updates on their lock screen and that they can transfer with a single click from those messages directly into the right app at the right place, or suddenly arrive at a page deep within a web hierarchy no matter how the host site's URLs are structured. Today no one cares who developed that technology a decade ago. --Eliyahu S ^Talk 20:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deeplink b-w logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deeplink b-w logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]