User talk:Elinrubio6
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Elinrubio6! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
---|
|
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Flag of Mauritania, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Peaceray (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Ould Bilal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equity Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sûreté Nationale.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]Hi Elinrubio6! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I notice that every edit you have made has been marked as a minor edit. Please be aware that marking an edit as minor, when it is not, is considered poor etiquette. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Please stop
[edit]Please stop making cosmetic changes which do not improve articles. This includes updating the date on maintenance template, fixing re-directs that aren't broken, and adding italics to section headings. I may have missed a few. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with the manual of style. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Further to the above request, which you appear to have ignored since 19 October 2024. Please do not fix redirects that are NOT broken. I have reverted the two edits to the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic) for this reason. Additionally, please do not "correct" the spelling of wiki-linked article titles that are supported by sources. In this case "Malainine Sadik" appears to be the established English usage, while "Melainine Sadik" appears to be an alternative spelling more commonly used in other languages. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have also reverted your edit to Coat of arms of Western Sahara for similar reasons, as your changes were not an improvement to an article that was not broken. Additionally, please do not change the date on article maintenance clean-up tags unless you actually fix the problem. (See WP:MTR for more.) The date indicates how long a clean-up problem has existed in an article and can be used to prioritise the clean-up of older articles, first. Changing the date is potentially disruptive to the clean-up process. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 02:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I also undone your edits to articles about Sidi Ahmed, 2005 El Mreiti base attack, Sidi and Islam in Mauritania. In the article about Sufian Tayeh, your edit emphasised additional details about his death that I thought were better placed in the body of the article. Please see MOS:LEAD and WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY for an in-depth explanation of how the article lead section should be written. Your edits to the Saudi–Egypt Causeway article changed redirects that were NOTBROKEN and in the case of the Bridge of the Horns change a redirect link that took the reader to the appropriate sections in an article that discussed the bridge and substituted a less useful link to the lead of the article that was not relevant. Such changes are not WP:RF|helpful to readers]]. Which is one more reason why your changes are undesirable. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Misleading edit summaries
[edit]Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Jouleibib. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. I notice that since being warned in August 2024, you have continued to mark your edits as "Minor" and added the text "Wiki page updated." This edit summary does not assist other editors identify what you have changed and why you have done so. Furthermore, it suggests you are engaging in disruptive editing for no useful purpose. I am reverting the change you made to the article about Jouleibib for this reason. If you think I am wrong to do so, please feel free to reply here to this message. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
National varieties of English
[edit]Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. CMD (talk) 12:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)