User talk:Edurant

Welcome!

Hello, Edurant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! And welcome to WikiProject Wisconsin! Royalbroil 05:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milwaukee School of Engineering football

Say, do you know anything about the history of MSOE's football program. I have it from an inside source in the Student Life department that MSOE is officially undefeated against Notre Dame in football, which would be distinct as the only team in the coutry to do so. Can you possibly verify that during the course of your work-day? Cheers, PaddyM 04:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, both of my alma maters haven't lost a single game to Notre Dame this season, although Michigan's streak isn't as long. Perhaps I should take a picture of the corresponding MSOE football T-shirt and add it to the main article. That would be great encyclopedic content. Best Regards, Edurant 04:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm reading your response incorrectly, but I mean that MSOE is undefeated in the history of their program, not metaphorically since they do not currently have a team. Does that make sense? Anyway, I can't find the proper citation anywhere for it, unless maybe a book at the MSOE bookstore might have some insights. Cheers, PaddyM 18:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although I think there was a football team at one point, very long ago, I would say it is not of note for Wikipedia. The "undefeated in football since 1903" is a common joke in the MSOE community and I thought you were alluding to that joke. Edurant 22:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two FYI's

Just noticed a couple of editing things in a recent edit you made. One is that you don't have to use |'s to "uncapitalize" links. For instance, Volt and volt both work. One of the few places the wiki-links makes any sense IMHO. Also a style note, generally you only link to the first instance of a word, at least in a small area. So basically if one sentence has volt and it's linked, you don't do it in the next couple of paras. It reduces the sea of blue effect. Anyway, enjoy! Maury 21:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Starkey and red links

If you think the red links to Starkey Laboratories and Starkey Hearing Foundation will encourage their creation, feel free to put them back in. I didn't find much on them in WP the first time I looked. Now I see Starkey Labs (not Laboratories) in the Eden Prairie article. If that were properly red-linked, it would deter some of the careful disambig-page cleaners from ripping out that entry. The fact (if it's a fact) that it's the world's largest mfr of hearing aids probably qualifies it for an article. Consider adding a stub for it. You might be surprised how many people will add info to a stub, but find it hard to actually start an article. Your assumptions about my reasons for their removal are just about right, and your thinking on having a red link if only to reassure readers that their search was correct is also well founded, I think. Dab cleaners have to decide between adspam and truly notable companies that deserve articles; I like to think I get most of them right. If I mess one up here and there, the article will probably get written before long and then added to the dab page anyway, I hope. If you would like to discuss any other aspects of this, please feel free. I have met some of my best Wikipedian friends and collaborators by stepping on toes while trying to do some good. If you want me to fix up any of this, just ask. If you have all you need, happy editing! Chris the speller 00:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thought: as WP is not an index, the matter of whether either of these is frequently called simply "Starkey" comes into play on a dab page. If they are never called by just the one name, some editors may want to remove them, as the natural title for their articles is something longer than "Starkey". Some editors will glance at the article to see if the name is actually used that way, e.g. "Starkey is the largest manufacturer ...", in which case the entry should be in the top part of the dab page. "Starkey College", if there were one, might be taken off the dab page because readers would be expected to type both words and hit the "Go" button. Although a dab page is meant only to differentiate articles that could have the same natural title, I would put Starkey Laboratories under the "See also" section as a courtesy to the reader who is not sure if it is Starkey Company, Starkey Manufacturing or Starkey Corporation. Hope this sheds plenty of light. Chris the speller 00:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I might nominate your Starkey Laboratories stub for "Featured Stub" status. ;-) It looks good. Chris the speller 04:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MSOELogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:MSOELogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Edurant! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Richard Felder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Edurant! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities

Category:Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MSOERoscoeRaider.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MSOERoscoeRaider.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]