User talk:Edggjhh

Welcome

Hello, Edggjhh, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - ^theWOLFchild 09:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2016

Hello, I'm Laser brain. Your recent edit to the page Superman in film appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Superman in film, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My mistake. Edggjhh (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Simpsons home video releases with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed innacurate information. That is not disruptive editing. Edggjhh (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Doctor Who home video releases

Re your edits to List of Doctor Who home video releases - I suggest that you look at the link http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/releases/Doctor-Volume-Release/5566 that you provided. Under "Features:", twelfth bullet, it says "Marco Polo (dur. 31' 24") - a condensed version of the fourth Doctor Who story". --Redrose64 (talk) 07:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That site's list does not include features. See http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/shows/Doctor/4939. Edggjhh (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does. If you visit the link that I gave above - which I copied unchanged from your edit summary here - you will see the following headings: "Release Information:", "Audio/Video Information:", "Buying Information:", "Description:", "Features:". Under the last of these, there are fourteen features listed, and Marco Polo is the twelfth. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't read this list: http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/shows/Doctor/4939, did you? Edggjhh (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do with it? It's not a direct source for "The Beginning" box set. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have justified my edits. You may not agree with them, but that is not reason enough to call them "disruptive". Edggjhh (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have not justified them. Continuing to make edits like this without discussion is disruptive. You need to make your case at the article's talk page. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Finding Dory, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 15:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ... richi (hello) 21:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. It's a shame that the standard uw template message sequence brings us to this point, but I see other editors have issues several prior warnings in the last few months. My reverts were mainly about WP:MOSNUM—e.g., changing "23rd" to "twenty-third". Practically every style guide, including WP:MOS says not to spell out numbers greater than 9 or 10. Hope that helps. ... richi (hello) 08:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Edggjhh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

This account has been blocked temporarily from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Alex Shih ^Talk 05:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Edggjhh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't see any evidence. You are just assuming and deciding. See all my contributions. All have been constructive. Edggjhh (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Two words: FUCK YOU.

Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]