User talk:Ed.Valdez

Welcome!

Hello, Ed.Valdez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Edward Bass (director), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Frank | talk 19:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Herguan University

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Herguan University. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was fixing grammar, making it a smoother read. It was not my intention to remove any credible material.--Edgar Valdezzz (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Herguan University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.jfeise (talk) 08:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Herguan University shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. jfeise (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Herguan University, you may be blocked from editing. jfeise (talk) 09:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Herguan University, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Note that misleading edit summaries designed to cover up the nature of your changes, such as the one you provided in your most recent edit, do not endear you to other contributors. --Orlady (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Herguan University. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ^Bongo_matic 08:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for slow moving edit warring at MonaVie. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 17:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that admins also look at User_talk:AndyTheGrump#April_2012 - I was blocked at the same time, for supposedly contributing to the same 'edit-war'. Multiple contributors have agreed that the block was unwarrented, and I have been unblocked AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you following the discussion here. However, looking at your contributions it is fairly obvious that you have a conflict of interest with regards to Herguan University and MonaVie. It is highly suspicious that you are only interested in removing criticism about a dimploma mill and a controversial multi-level marketing scheme. Copy and pasting press releases into articles only makes this more obvious. I am tempted to indefinitely block you as a promotional only account but for now I will give you the benefit of the doubt. If the same pattern of editing persists then I will. Please let me know if you are unsure about what I mean. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has or may be used abusively.
This account has been blocked permanently to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee.[1]

Checkuser confirms you and YorbaLindaOCMan are sockuppets, and therefore both accounts have been blocked indefinitely. Courcelles 01:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]