User talk:Eaccess07

Regarding your edit to Coat of Eyes:

Your recent edit to Coat of Eyes (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 03:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Drowning clip.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:Drowning clip.ogg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Allan Bates

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Allan Bates, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.allanbates.com/breif_bio.htm. As a copyright violation, Allan Bates appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Allan Bates has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Allan Bates. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Allan Bates, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 12:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Coat of Eyes

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Coat of Eyes, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=81530128. As a copyright violation, Coat of Eyes appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Coat of Eyes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Coat of Eyes. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Coat of Eyes, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mr Stephen 12:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Eyes

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as you did to Coat of Eyes. We cannot accept copyrighted material for legal reasons, as it is not compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License. Your contributions must be in your own words. Thank you. Mr Stephen 11:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add copyrighted material to an article, as you did to Coat of Eyes, you will be blocked from editing. Daniel.Bryant 11:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Please sign your posts to talk pages with four tildes, ie ~~~~. Just to be clear; are you saying that you wrote the text at http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=81530128, you own the copyright in it, and you are willing to realease it under the GNU Free Documentation License? Mr Stephen 18:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The following text is (mostly) from here;

"If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, explain this on the article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL.

Note: Articles on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view and must be verifiable in reliable published sources; copyright issues aside, your text may not be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia."

Regards, Mr Stephen 23:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allan bates

The article Allan bates has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 00:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Eyes (again)

Hey, I'm a huge Pumpkins fan and I have no doubt about Coat of Eyes' existence or anything. It's just that they dont belong on wikipedia, according to wikipedia policy. Forums and website comment posts cannot be used as sources, even if they are recognized by you and I to be "knowledgeable" third party fans, or even the band members themselves. And besides, on principle, early projects of members of later, more memorable bands should not be getting their own articles. Even "The Marked" should probably just be a section under the Billy Corgan article, but there are a lot of sources and articles that discuss the Marked, unlike Coat of Eyes. How's this for a compromise? If Coat of Eyes is truly a precursor to The Marked, I would have no objections to putting a "Coat of Eyes" section on the Marked article. We'd still have to worry about the lack of sources, but it wouldnt need to be deleted. Just my two cents. Unfortunately, I stand by my interpretation that Coat of Eyes should not be its own article at this point. -Werideatdusk33 (talk) 04:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd be happy to integrate the Coat of Eyes article into the Marked article. We should still ahve some sources though. For them, and for the Marked. So feel free to add those you mentioned, and we'll leave it to the admin-bots to sort out whether they're valid. --Werideatdusk33 (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Bates (musician).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 17:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Caravelli

Hello, Eaccess07. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Paul Caravelli, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Paul Caravelli to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Caravelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Caravelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Caravelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 04:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Caravelli

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Paul Caravelli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Caravelli

Hi Eaccess07, I just wanted to tell you I've removed your draft article from Talk:Paul Caravelli because this is completely the wrong place for an article. The original article has already been speedily deleted because it was wholly inappropriate for Wikipedia.

If you want to rewrite and improve the article and attempt to get it accepted, can I suggest you do this via the Article Wizard and let Articles for Creation reviewers take a look at it first. If you want you can create it in your 'sandbox' first (see link at top of your screen).

From a quick look at the new draft, it wouldn't be accepted in its current form. You need to show Caravelli has been widely talked about in reliable news/book sources. The one news article you have at the moment is the same one that supported your deleted article (and only verified he was a reality TV contestant). Sionk (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Bates (musician) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Bates (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Bates (musician)

Hello Eaccess07. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Greg Bates (musician)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Bates (musician)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]