User talk:Duckbill
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Duckbill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- GraemeL (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
I answered your question at the help desk and noticed that you hadn't received a welcome message. you've been around for a while, but the links might still be useful. --GraemeL (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Spell checking
[edit]Thanks for the correction, for some reason I seem to keep misspelling wikipedia! MartinRe 23:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Kutztown
[edit]Thanks a lot for that... I just started using wikipedia, so i'm still learning as much as possible. Do you live in Kutztown? 10141011 02:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Transparency
[edit]Hello duckbill,
i reversed your edits on transparency. Quatemala is transparency (humanities) optics is material
Regards Mion 00:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Lets have a discussion about it first on this page or my page
Regards Mion 01:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
hoi Duckbill there is an update on the talkpage Transparency . reg Mion 05:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
(Thanks for the seperate editing).
Transparent editing
[edit]I'd like to invite you to have a short chat at Talk:Transparency. ;) -- Ravn 11:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
I've disambiguated "Reading" in favour of Reading, Berkshire. In case you were wondering, I'm not a fan; I just noticed his name on the 'Year of birth missing' category and thought I'd have a go! Matve 17:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Transparent
[edit]Hoi duckbill,
I.m off for holiday, back around 20-3, so the mediation gets more time. Reg. Mion 12:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
iPod
[edit]The edit before the revert showed up as a giberish edit on the vandalism watch program. It was infact correct. This is how it looked before the revert. nano is 0.27 inches (6.9 mm) thick, weighs 1.5 ounces (42 g), and is 62% smaller by volume than its predecessor, available in 1 GB (introduced on February 7, 2006), 2 GB, and 4 GB models. It has a 65,536 color display that can show photographs, and connects to a computer via USB 2.0. The head
Notice the repeating ? Although it might not be vandalism, it does qualify for a revert. As I and others on the vandalism watch are fighting with vandals all the time, we do not have the time to post a reason every time; we use templates which say what we are reverting it to. So as you may not see how it is justifide, too bad, it was to us. --OrbitOne 22:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
I suppose your computer hid this, but when put together with out spaces, & n b s p ; showed up all over your edit. That is why your edit was reverted. --OrbitOne 22:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Redding
[edit]Hello Duckbill. I see you've done some editing on the Redding page, so maybe you could answer my question. Currently on the disambiguation page, there are links to several pages with the word 'Redding' in them (i.e. Noel Redding). I'm simply trying to create a page for the band called Redding, but the link isn't working. It seems that the reason is that the page called Redding is already the link to the disambiguation page itself. Do you know of a way I can create a page called Redding? Thanks! Reddingmusic
Thank you very much for your comments. They were incredibly helpful. I'm new to using Wikipedia, but I think I've got a good handle on things now. The example of the "Oasis (band)" page was great. That seems to be just what I'm looking to do. I intend to create a history and biography for the band Redding on the "Redding (band)" page you created for me. Once again, thank you. Have a great weekend. Reddingmusic 19:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
"Avoid redirect" counter to WP:D
[edit]Sorry - I didn't know about that. CarolGray 16:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
RE: Reading, Berkshire
[edit]Hello there. The disambiguation is indeed appropriate. I apologize for not checking on that. Those articles were driving me insane and I got sloppy. James084 18:24, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the ambiguity Duckbill, I have made it point at the right Reading now. adamsan 17:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
mdash
[edit]You can add literal em dashes: — instead of HTML entities: — to avoid cluttering up the markup. — Omegatron 14:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Certainly dertainly I am happy with the UTF-8 creaminess. Up until now I have concentrated on getting the content nice. I suppose just entering the HTML entity, then doing "preview" and then pasting from the representation ought to do it nicely. Duckbill 21:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- :-) There is a box right below the edit box that lets you click and insert them: –—…[][[]]~|°§→#≈±−×¹²³‘“’” Also see WP:MOSDASH#Dashes_on_keyboards — Omegatron 22:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Your mediation request
[edit]Hi there! It seems your Mediation Request from February 14 has managed to slip under the radar. I was wondering if this case still needed mediation. If so, I will update the case and add it back to the bottom of the list with today's date so it can be looked at once more. If not, I will close the case to help clean up the backlog in the case list. Feel free to reply here or on my talk page. Thanks. Cowman109Talk 19:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Bits and bytes
[edit]Thanks for all your edits to these articles. I've seen them go by on my watchlist, and they all look good and helpful. — Omegatron 21:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment from Kickin' Da Speaker
[edit]Thank you for your message. I did not know about that aricle, and now understand the reason behind the use of nbsp; (sorry about my edit!).
However, for the units... I don't think it would make sense to have the whole article spell out the units everytime they reoccur. I believe it would be fine to have it like I first edited the article: in the first occurence of the unit, spell it out and give its abbreviation in parenthesis, then use the abbreviation. What do you think? I will not re-edit the SATA article for now. I'd like to have your opinion first. Thanks! Kickin' Da Speaker 22:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
{{Ambiguous link}}
[edit]The Template Barnstar | ||
For a great[disambiguation needed] idea that will help us all at WP:DAB. Dekimasu 01:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
- I think this is a brilliant idea. I've been working on the links to Fort William, and I've used your template to mark some American Fort Williams that, being British, I don't know enough about. Thank you. CarolGray 20:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've just checked back on these, and three out of four have been fixed. Great! CarolGray 16:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tao-logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Tao-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of G Whizz
[edit]A tag has been placed on G Whizz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The-Pope (talk) 05:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sharan (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
[edit]Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:SIM card sizes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 17:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
[edit]I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Majorat, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Duckbill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duckbill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duckbill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duckbill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"G-Whizz" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect G-Whizz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § G-Whizz until a consensus is reached. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)