User talk:DrSpengler

Hey!

Where's your comics at?!--SexyKick 04:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some lunatic furry with a hardcore Fifi obsession named "Rkerekes13" started harassing me across two different e-mail accounts and my Facebook account, then started stealing my art and posting it on DA under his own name. I got DA to make him take it down, but he then started calling me "sinful" and a "sinner" (he's apparantly a very devote Christian) and I just decided I couldn't take all the harassment anymore, so I deleted all my pages and my DA account and stopped drawing. When the obsessive fanboys who think Fifi is real and are actually "in love" with her begin attacking me through my Facebook page, knowing my real name and my friends, that's when I decided it was time to walk away. --Spengs (talk) 22:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bummer...I really enjoyed your comics too. : (--SexyKick 00:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fifi La Fume article

I just thought you should be aware that they intend to delete the Fifi La Fume article, and since you've been a fair bit involved with it, I thought you should comment here. The deletion aka "merger" won't proceed with a clear consensus to keep.--SexyKick 02:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Rattled Rooster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DrSpengler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penelope Pussycat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penelope Pussycat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penelope Pussycat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]